Notations and organization of the paper [02D6]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Notations and organization of the paper
In the whole paper, will denote a compact Kähler manifold of dimension , a smooth closed form of bidegree which is non-negative and big, i.e. the smooth measure is not identical to zero. For convenience we normalize so that
will denote a normal complex space. A resolution of will be a projective bimeromorphic holomorphic morphism , being smooth, such that is an isomorphism. A resolution is a log-resolution iff is a divisor with simple normal crossings. Assume we have a coherent ideal sheaf . A log resolution of is a projective bimeromorphic holomorphic morphism being smooth, such that is an isomorphism with the additional property that the ideal sheaf 22 2 is locallly the ideal sheaf of generated by the family of holomorphic functions , where are local generators of . The set is the analytic subvariety defined by . satisfies where is a positive integer attached to any exceptional divisor of .
A pair is a pair with a normal complex space and a -Weil divisor where are rational numbers and is a finite family of pairwise distinct irreducible codimension 1 subvarieties of . A log resolution of a pair is a log resolution of the ideal where is an integer such that . 33 3 The MMP is conjectured to work for pairs. This seemingly technical extension of the MMP is known as log-MMP. log-MMP works in dimension . The philosophy of the log-MMP is to define the canonical divisor of a pair to be and to try and prove the same theorems for pairs and for varieties.
All these flavors of log-resolutions exist by [Hi] if the variety (resp. pair) under consideration is open in (resp. a restriction to an open subset of) a compact variety (pair).
The paper is organized as follows. In section 1 we define, following [GZ 2], the set of -psh functions with finite self-energy, and produce weak solutions to complex Monge-Ampère equations in the class (see proposition 1.4). This is our first basic observation: weak solutions are easy to produce in .
The continuity of the solutions is established in section 2 (see Theorem 2.1), by using ideas from [K 1,2,3] and [GZ 1]. This, together with propositions 3.1 and 3.3, yields Theorem A. We actually expect the solutions to be Hölder-continuous, as Theorem 3.5 indicates. We indeed establish further regularity results in section 3, especially Theorem 3.6, by using ideas of [Y],[Ts]. This yields Theorem B.
In section 4 we solve Monge-Ampère equations of the type , (see Theorems 4.1, 4.4) by a fixed point method. Here again the use of class makes life easier, and allows us to reduce our analysis to previously studied Monge-Ampère equations .
In section 5 we recall some basic facts on some of the singularities encountered in the MMP, and in section 6 we explain what sort of measures we need to consider in order to produce Kähler-Einstein metrics. An important observation is lemma 6.4, which shows that it is necessary to restrict to the case of log terminal singularities (see definition 5.3).
Finally in section 7 we show how our results from sections 2,3,4 allow us to produce singular Kähler-Einstein metrics (see Theorems 7.5, 7.8, 7.12). This is where we prove Theorem C.