ScalingStacks

Notations and organization of the paper [02D6]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Notations and organization of the paper

In the whole paper, XX will denote a compact Kähler manifold of dimension nn, ω\omega a smooth closed form of bidegree (1,1)(1,1) which is non-negative and big, i.e. the smooth measure ωn\omega^{n} is not identical to zero. For convenience we normalize ω\omega so that

V​o​lω​(X):=∫Xωn=1.Vol_{\omega}(X):=\int_{X}\omega^{n}=1.

VV will denote a normal complex space. A resolution of VV will be a projective bimeromorphic holomorphic morphism π:X→V\pi:X\to V, XX being smooth, such that π:π−1​(Vr​e​g)→Vr​e​g\pi:\pi^{-1}(V^{reg})\to V^{reg} is an isomorphism. A resolution π\pi is a log-resolution iff π−1​(Vs​i​n​g)\pi^{-1}(V^{sing}) is a divisor with simple normal crossings. Assume we have a coherent ideal sheaf ℐ⊂𝒪V\mathcal{I}\subset\mathcal{O}_{V}. A log resolution of (V,ℐ)(V,\mathcal{I}) is a projective bimeromorphic holomorphic morphism π:X→V\pi:X\to V XX being smooth, such that OPENπ:π−1​(V−Z⁡(ℐ))r​e​g)→(V−Z⁡(ℐ))r​e​g\pi:\pi^{-1}(V-Z(\mathcal{I}))^{reg})\to(V-Z(\mathcal{I}))^{reg} is an isomorphism with the additional property that the ideal sheaf π−1​ℐ.𝒪X\pi^{-1}\mathcal{I}.\mathcal{O}_{X} 22 2 π−1​ℐ.𝒪X\pi^{-1}\mathcal{I}.\mathcal{O}_{X} is locallly the ideal sheaf of 𝒪X\mathcal{O}_{X} generated by the family of holomorphic functions (π∗​fI)I(\pi^{*}f_{I})_{I}, where (fI)I(f_{I})_{I} are local generators of ℐ\mathcal{I}. The set Z⁡(ℐ)Z(\mathcal{I}) is the analytic subvariety defined by ℐ\mathcal{I}. satisfies π−1ℐ.𝒪X=𝒪X(−∑γEE)⊂𝒪X\pi^{-1}\mathcal{I}.\mathcal{O}_{X}=\mathcal{O}_{X}(-\sum\gamma_{E}E)\subset\mathcal{O}_{X} where γE∈ℕ\gamma_{E}\in\mathbb{N} is a positive integer attached to any exceptional divisor EE of π\pi.

A pair is a pair (V,Δ)(V,\Delta) with VV a normal complex space and Δ\Delta a ℚ\mathbb{Q}-Weil divisor Δ=∑idi​Ei\Delta=\sum_{i}d_{i}E_{i} where 0≤di≤10\leq d_{i}\leq 1 are rational numbers and (Ei)i(E_{i})_{i} is a finite family of pairwise distinct irreducible codimension 1 subvarieties of VV. A log resolution of a pair is a log resolution of the ideal ℐN​Δ\mathcal{I}_{N\Delta} where NN is an integer such that N​di∈ℕNd_{i}\in\mathbb{N}. 33 3 The MMP is conjectured to work for pairs. This seemingly technical extension of the MMP is known as log-MMP. log-MMP works in dimension ≤3\leq 3. The philosophy of the log-MMP is to define the canonical divisor of a pair to be K(V,Δ):=KV+ΔK_{(V,\Delta)}:=K_{V}+\Delta and to try and prove the same theorems for pairs and for varieties.

All these flavors of log-resolutions exist by [Hi] if the variety (resp. pair) under consideration is open in (resp. a restriction to an open subset of) a compact variety (pair).

The paper is organized as follows. In section 1 we define, following [GZ 2], the set ℰ1​(X,ω){\mathcal{E}}^{1}(X,\omega) of ω\omega-psh functions with finite self-energy, and produce weak solutions to complex Monge-Ampère equations (ω+d​dc​φ)n=μ(\omega+dd^{c}\varphi)^{n}=\mu in the class ℰ1​(X,ω){\mathcal{E}}^{1}(X,\omega) (see proposition 1.4). This is our first basic observation: weak solutions are easy to produce in ℰ1​(X,ω){\mathcal{E}}^{1}(X,\omega).

The continuity of the solutions is established in section 2 (see Theorem 2.1), by using ideas from [K 1,2,3] and [GZ 1]. This, together with propositions 3.1 and 3.3, yields Theorem A. We actually expect the solutions to be Hölder-continuous, as Theorem 3.5 indicates. We indeed establish further regularity results in section 3, especially Theorem 3.6, by using ideas of [Y],[Ts]. This yields Theorem B.

In section 4 we solve Monge-Ampère equations of the type (ω+d​dc​φ)n=et​φ​μ(\omega+dd^{c}\varphi)^{n}=e^{t\varphi}\mu, t>0t>0 (see Theorems 4.1, 4.4) by a fixed point method. Here again the use of class ℰ1​(X,ω){\mathcal{E}}^{1}(X,\omega) makes life easier, and allows us to reduce our analysis to previously studied Monge-Ampère equations (ω+d​dc​φ)n=μ′(\omega+dd^{c}\varphi)^{n}=\mu^{\prime}.

In section 5 we recall some basic facts on some of the singularities encountered in the MMP, and in section 6 we explain what sort of measures μ\mu we need to consider in order to produce Kähler-Einstein metrics. An important observation is lemma 6.4, which shows that it is necessary to restrict to the case of log terminal singularities (see definition 5.3).

Finally in section 7 we show how our results from sections 2,3,4 allow us to produce singular Kähler-Einstein metrics (see Theorems 7.5, 7.8, 7.12). This is where we prove Theorem C.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.