Proof. [02C8]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
The argument in the previous subsection implies that maps the smooth set in to the regular set in . So we need to show that if is a smooth point of , then the limit metric on is also smooth at . Denote by the Kähler-Einstein metric on , and the induced Fubini-Study metric. Then we have with . By our main Theorem 1.1 and Proposition 2.1 there is a constant such that for all . Also by arguments similar to the proof of Lemma 4.3 we see that there is a constant such that for all we have , and . Now write , where is , or . So with suitable normalization of we have the equation
| (4.1) |
Then it is not hard to see that for some constant . Now for any in , we choose a small neighborhood . Then there are corresponding points , such that converges smoothly to in . By standard elliptic estimate we see that is uniformly bounded. Then by (4.1) there is a such that in . Thus . Then in with respect to the metric , the right hand side of (4.1) has a uniform bound. Therefore we can apply the Evans-Krylov theory(see for example [3]) to conclude that has a uniform bound in . Then standard arguments show that all covariant derivatives of (with respect to ) are uniformly bounded, so the Kähler-Einstein metrics converge smoothly in a neighborhood of .
∎