ScalingStacks

4.4. Further results [02C6]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

4.4. Further results

We will now restrict attention to the case when X∞X_{\infty} is the limit of Kähler-Einstein manifolds Xi∈𝒦⁡(n,c,V)X_{i}\in{\mathcal{K}}(n,c,V) with Ricci curvature +1, -1/2 or 0. We suppose that L=KX−1L=K_{X}^{-1} or KX2K_{X}^{2} in the first and second situations and in the third situation we suppose that the manifolds are Calabi-Yau, so we have fixed holomorphic nn forms Θi\Theta_{i} over XiX_{i} with Θi∧Θ¯i\Theta_{i}\wedge\overline{\Theta}_{i} the volume form. For brevity we just call this “the Kähler-Einstein case”.

Proposition 4.14.

In the Kähler-Einstein case the map T:X∞→WT:X_{\infty}\rightarrow W takes the differential geometric limit singular set to the algebro-geometric singular set.

Proof.

The argument in the previous subsection implies that TT maps the smooth set in X∞X_{\infty} to the regular set in WW. So we need to show that if T⁡(p)T(p) is a smooth point of WW, then the limit metric on X∞X_{\infty} is also smooth at pp. Denote by ωi\omega_{i} the Kähler-Einstein metric on XiX_{i}, and ωi′\omega_{i}^{\prime} the induced Fubini-Study metric. Then we have ωi′=ωi+−1​∂∂¯​ϕi\omega_{i}^{\prime}=\omega_{i}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\phi_{i} with ϕi=k−1​log⁡ρk​(ωi)\phi_{i}=k^{-1}\log\rho_{k}(\omega_{i}). By our main Theorem 1.1 and Proposition 2.1 there is a constant C1>0C_{1}>0 such that |ϕi|L∞≤C1|\phi_{i}|_{L^{\infty}}\leq C_{1} for all ii. Also by arguments similar to the proof of Lemma 4.3 we see that there is a constant C2>0C_{2}>0 such that for all ii we have |∇ωiϕi|L∞≤C2|\nabla_{\omega_{i}}\phi_{i}|_{L^{\infty}}\leq C_{2}, and ωi′≤C2​ωi\omega_{i}^{\prime}\leq C_{2}\omega_{i}. Now write R​i​c​(ωi′)=λ​ωi′+−1​∂∂¯​hiRic(\omega_{i}^{\prime})=\lambda\omega_{i}^{\prime}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}h_{i}, where λ\lambda is 11, −12-\frac{1}{2} or 00. So with suitable normalization of hih_{i} we have the equation

(4.1) ωin=ehi+λ​ϕi​ωi′n.\omega_{i}^{n}=e^{h_{i}+\lambda\phi_{i}}\omega_{i}^{\prime n}.

Then it is not hard to see that ∫Xihi2​ωi′n≤C3\int_{X_{i}}h_{i}^{2}\omega_{i}^{\prime n}\leq C_{3} for some constant C3>0C_{3}>0. Now for any pp in Wr​e​gW^{reg}, we choose a small neighborhood B⁡(p,δ)⊂Wr​e​gB(p,\delta)\subset W^{reg}. Then there are corresponding points pi∈Xip_{i}\in X_{i}, such that B⁡(pi,δ)B(p_{i},\delta) converges smoothly to B⁡(p,δ)B(p,\delta) in ℂ​ℙNk\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{N_{k}}. By standard elliptic estimate we see that |hi|C1​(B⁡(pi,δ/2),ωi′)|h_{i}|_{C^{1}(B(p_{i},\delta/2),\omega_{i}^{\prime})} is uniformly bounded. Then by (4.1) there is a C4>0C_{4}>0 such that C4−1​ωi≤ωi′≤C4​ωiC_{4}^{-1}\omega_{i}\leq\omega_{i}^{\prime}\leq C_{4}\omega_{i} in B⁡(pi,δ/2)B(p_{i},\delta/2). Thus |∇ωi′ϕi|L∞​(B⁡(pi,δ/2))≤C4​|∇ωiϕi|L∞​(B⁡(pi,δ/2))≤C4​C2|\nabla_{\omega_{i}^{\prime}}\phi_{i}|_{L^{\infty}(B(p_{i},\delta/2))}\leq C_{4}|\nabla_{\omega_{i}}\phi_{i}|_{L^{\infty}(B(p_{i},\delta/2))}\leq C_{4}C_{2}. Then in B⁡(pi,δ/2)B(p_{i},\delta/2) with respect to the metric ωi′\omega_{i}^{\prime}, the right hand side of (4.1) has a uniform C1C^{1} bound. Therefore we can apply the Evans-Krylov theory(see for example [3]) to conclude that |ϕi||\phi_{i}| has a uniform C2,αC^{2,\alpha} bound in B⁡(pi,δ/4)B(p_{i},\delta/4). Then standard arguments show that all covariant derivatives of ϕi\phi_{i}(with respect to ωi′\omega_{i}^{\prime}) are uniformly bounded, so the Kähler-Einstein metrics ωi\omega_{i} converge smoothly in a neighborhood of pp.

∎

Proposition 4.15.

In the Kähler-Einstein case, the algebro-geometric limit WW has log-terminal singularities.

Proof.

By general theory, what the statement really means is that for any singular point xx in WW, there is a neighborhood UU, and a nowhere zero holomorphic nn form Θ\Theta on Wr​e​g∩UW^{reg}\cap U with ∫Wr​e​g∩UΘ∧Θ¯<∞\int_{W^{reg}\cap U}\Theta\wedge\overline{\Theta}<\infty. We first consider the cases L=KX2L=K_{X}^{2} and KX−1K_{X}^{-1}. Previous discussion has shown that for any xx, there is a neighborhood UU of xx, an integer k>0k>0, a constant C>0C>0, and a section ss of LkL^{k} over X∞∖Σ=Wr​e​gX_{\infty}\setminus\Sigma=W^{reg} with C−1≤‖s⁡(x)‖2≤CC^{-1}\leq\|s(x)\|^{2}\leq C for x∈Wr​e​g∩Ux\in W^{reg}\cap U. Here the norm is taken with respect to the Kähler-Einstein metric. When L=KX2L=K_{X}^{2}, we define Θ=(s⊗s¯)12​k\Theta=(s\otimes\overline{s})^{\frac{1}{2k}}, then

∫Wr​e​g∩UΘ∧Θ¯=∫Wr​e​g∩U‖s‖1k​𝑑v​o​l≤C12​k​V​o​l​(W).\int_{W^{reg}\cap U}\Theta\wedge\overline{\Theta}=\int_{W^{reg}\cap U}\|s\|^{\frac{1}{k}}dvol\leq C^{\frac{1}{2k}}Vol(W).

When L=−KXL=-K_{X}, we define Θ=(s∗⊗s∗¯)1k\Theta=(s^{*}\otimes\overline{s^{*}})^{\frac{1}{k}}, where s∗s^{*} is the dual section of ss. So ‖s∗‖=‖s‖−1\|s^{*}\|=\|s\|^{-1}. Then

∫Wr​e​g∩UΘ∧Θ¯=∫Wr​e​g∩U‖s∗‖2k​𝑑v​o​l≤C−1k​V​o​l​(W).\int_{W^{reg}\cap U}\Theta\wedge\overline{\Theta}=\int_{W^{reg}\cap U}\|s^{*}\|^{\frac{2}{k}}dvol\leq C^{-\frac{1}{k}}Vol(W).

In the Calabi-Yau case, since Θi\Theta_{i} has norm one, we easily see that there is a limit holomorphic volume form Θ\Theta on X∞∖Σ=Wr​e​gX_{\infty}\setminus\Sigma=W^{reg} with norm one. Then ∫Wr​e​gΘ∧Θ¯=V​o​l​(W).\int_{W^{reg}}\Theta\wedge\overline{\Theta}=Vol(W). ∎

Remark 4.16.

From the uniform bound of the Kähler potentials ϕi\phi_{i}, it is not hard to see that the Kähler forms ωi\omega_{i} converge to a singular Kähler-Einstein metric ω∞\omega_{\infty} on WW in the sense of [12].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.