ScalingStacks

3.2.1. Cut-offs [02BB]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3.2.1. Cut-offs

To begin we fix some sequence kν→∞k_{\nu}\rightarrow\infty so that the scalings of the based space (X∞,p)(X_{\infty},p) by kν\sqrt{k_{\nu}} converge to a tangent cone C⁡(Y)C(Y). For a while we focus attention on this cone. Write |z||z| for the distance from the vertex. Let ΣY⊂Y\Sigma_{Y}\subset Y be the singular set and Yreg=Y∖ΣY^{{\rm reg}}=Y\setminus\Sigma.

The only information about the singular set which we need is contained in the following proposition. This is very likely a standard fact but the proof is quite short so we include it.

Proposition 3.5.

For any η>0\eta>0 there is a function gg on YY, smooth on YregY^{{\rm reg}}, supported in the η\eta-neighbourhood of ΣY\Sigma_{Y}, equal to 11 on some neighbourhood of ΣY\Sigma_{Y} and with

‖∇g‖L2≤η.\|\nabla g\|_{L^{2}}\leq\eta.

Recall that YY has dimension 2​n−12n-1. For clarity in this proof we write N=2​n−1N=2n-1. A simple argument using the noncollapsing condition (1.2) and the Bishop inequality in the original manifolds shows that there are fixed numbers c¯,c¯>0\overline{c},\underline{c}>0 such that for r≤1r\leq 1 and any metric ball BrB_{r} in YY we have

(3.1) c¯​rN≤Vol​(Br)≤c¯​rN.\underline{c}r^{N}\leq\text{Vol}(B_{r})\leq\overline{c}r^{N}.

We know that ΣY\Sigma_{Y} is a compact set of Hausdorff dimension strictly less than N−2N-2. By the definition of Hausdorff dimension we can find a number λ∈(0,N−2)\lambda\in(0,N-2) with the following property. For any ϵ>0\epsilon>0 there is a cover of ΣY\Sigma_{Y} by a finite number of balls Bri/2​(pi)B_{r_{i}/2}(p_{i}) such that

(3.2) ∑riN−2−λ<ϵ.\sum r_{i}^{N-2-\lambda}<\epsilon.

We write Bi=Bri​(pi)B_{i}=B_{r_{i}}(p_{i}) so, in an obvious notation, the cover is by the balls 12​Bi\frac{1}{2}B_{i}. By the Vitali argument we can suppose that the balls 110​Bi\frac{1}{10}B_{i} are disjoint. We take ϵ<1\epsilon<1 so for each ii we obviously have ri≤ϵ1/(N−2−λ)<1r_{i}\leq\epsilon^{1/(N-2-\lambda)}<1.

Let ϕ⁡(t)\phi(t) be a standard cut-off function, vanishing for t≥2t\geq 2, equal to 11 when t≤1t\leq 1 and with derivative bounded by 22. Define

fi​(y)=ϕ⁡(ri−1​d​(y,pi)).f_{i}(y)=\phi(r_{i}^{-1}d(y,p_{i})).

Thus fif_{i} is supported in BiB_{i} and equal to 11 in 12​Bi\frac{1}{2}B_{i}. This function need not be smooth but it is Lipschitz and differentiable almost everywhere, with |∇fi|≤2​ri−1|\nabla f_{i}|\leq 2r_{i}^{-1}. Set f=∑fif=\sum f_{i}. Let Ψ⁡(t)\Psi(t) be a cut-off function, equal to 11 when t≥9/10t\geq 9/10, with Ψ⁡(0)=0\Psi(0)=0 and with derivative bounded by 22. Put g0=Ψ∘fg_{0}=\Psi\circ f. Then g0g_{0} is equal to 11 on a neighbourhood of ΣY\Sigma_{Y} and is supported in the 2​ϵ1/N−2−λ2\epsilon^{1/N-2-\lambda}-neighbourhood of ΣY\Sigma_{Y}. Also we have

‖∇g0‖L2≤2​‖∇f‖L2.\|\nabla g_{0}\|_{L^{2}}\leq 2\|\nabla f\|_{L^{2}}.

We claim that ‖∇f‖L22≤C5​ϵ\|\nabla f\|^{2}_{L^{2}}\leq C_{5}\epsilon for some fixed C5C_{5}, depending only on c¯,c¯\underline{c},\overline{c}. Given this claim we can make ‖∇g0‖L2\|\nabla g_{0}\|_{L^{2}} as small as we please and then finally approximate g0g_{0} by a smooth function gg to achieve our result. (Note that this approximation only involves working over a compact subset of YregY^{{\rm reg}}. )

To establish the claim, divide the index set into subsets

Iα={i:2−α−1≤ri<2−α},I_{\alpha}=\{i:2^{-\alpha-1}\leq r_{i}<2^{-\alpha}\},

for α≥0\alpha\geq 0. A simple packing argument, using the fact that the balls 110​Bi\frac{1}{10}B_{i} are disjoint, shows that there is a fixed number C6C_{6} with the following property. If j∈Iαj\in I_{\alpha} then for each fixed β≤α\beta\leq\alpha there are at most C6C_{6} balls BiB_{i} with i∈Iβi\in I_{\beta} which intersect BjB_{j}. Now we have

‖∇f‖L22≤∑i,j∫|∇fi||∇fj|.\|\nabla f\|^{2}_{L^{2}}\leq\sum_{i,j}\int|\nabla f_{i}|\ \ |\nabla f_{j}|.

Thus

∥∇f∥2L2≤2∑i,j:rj≤ri∫|∇fi||∇fj|.\|\nabla f\|^{2}_{L^{2}}\leq 2\sum_{i,j:r_{j}\leq r_{i}}\int|\nabla f_{i}|\ |\nabla f_{j}|.

For fixed jj there are at most C6​(1+log2⁡(rj−1))C_{6}(1+\log_{2}(r_{j}^{-1})) terms which contribute to this last sum. For each term |∇fi|≤2​ri−1≤2​rj−1|\nabla f_{i}|\leq 2r_{i}^{-1}\leq 2r_{j}^{-1} and the integrand is supported on the ball BjB_{j} of radius 2​rj2r_{j}. So for fixed jj the contribution to the sum is bounded by

8​C6​(1+log2⁡(rj−1))​rj−2​c¯​(2​rj)N.8C_{6}(1+\log_{2}(r_{j}^{-1}))r_{j}^{-2}\overline{c}(2r_{j})^{N}.

Hence, summing over jj,

‖∇f‖L22≤2N+3​C6​c¯​∑rjN−2​(log2⁡(rj−1)+1).\|\nabla f\|^{2}_{L^{2}}\leq 2^{N+3}C_{6}\overline{c}\sum r_{j}^{N-2}(\log_{2}(r_{j}^{-1})+1).

We can find a number C7C_{7} such that for t≥1t\geq 1 we have 1+log⁡t≤C7​tλ1+\log t\leq C_{7}t^{\lambda}. Thus

‖∇f‖L22≤2N+3​C6​C7​c¯​∑rjN−2−λ≤2N+3​C6​C7​c¯​ϵ.\|\nabla f\|^{2}_{L^{2}}\leq 2^{N+3}C_{6}C_{7}\overline{c}\sum r_{j}^{N-2-\lambda}\leq 2^{N+3}C_{6}C_{7}\overline{c}\epsilon.

We pick some base point y0y_{0} in YregY^{{\rm reg}}. We will need 4 parameters ρ,ϵ,δ,R\rho,\epsilon,\delta,R in our basic construction, where ρ,ϵ,δ\rho,\epsilon,\delta will be “small” and RR “large”. In particular δ<<ρ<<1<<R\delta<<\rho<<1<<R.

First we fix ρ\rho so that exp(−ρ2/4)≥3/4\exp(-\rho^{2}/4)\geq 3/4 and ρ≤(16​K1)−1\rho\leq(16K_{1})^{-1} where K1K_{1} is the constant in our first derivative estimate. We take u∗=ρ​y0∈C⁡(Y)u_{*}=\rho y_{0}\in C(Y), with the obvious notation. Fix any neighbourhood DD of u∗u_{*} whose closure does not meet the singular set in C⁡(Y)C(Y). For any ϵ\epsilon let YϵY_{\epsilon} be the set of points of distance greater than ϵ\epsilon from Σ\Sigma. Let Uϵ,δ,RU_{\epsilon,\delta,R} be the set of points zz in C⁡(Yϵ)C(Y_{\epsilon}) such that δ<|z|<R\delta<|z|<R. We choose the parameters so that Uϵ,δ,RU_{\epsilon,\delta,R} contains the closure of DD. We consider a smooth compactly supported cut-off function β\beta on Uϵ,δ,RU_{\epsilon,\delta,R}. For such a function we set

Eβ=∫e−|z|2/2|∇β|2.E_{\beta}=\int e^{-|z|^{2}/2}|\nabla\beta|^{2}.
Lemma 3.6.

For any given ζ>0\zeta>0 we can choose ϵ,δ,R\epsilon,\delta,R and a compactly supported function β\beta as above such that

  • •

    β=1\beta=1 on DD;

  • •

    Eβ≤ζE_{\beta}\leq\zeta.

To see this we take β=βδ​βR​βϵ\beta=\beta_{\delta}\beta_{R}\beta_{\epsilon} where

  • •

    βδ\beta_{\delta} is a standard cut-off function of |z||z| equal to 11 for |z|>2​δ|z|>2\delta.

  • •

    βR\beta_{R} is likewise a standard cut-off function of |z||z|, equal to 11 for |z|<R/2|z|<R/2.

  • •

    βϵ=1−(g∘ϖ)\beta_{\epsilon}=1-(g\circ\varpi) where gg is a function on C⁡(Y)C(Y) of the kind constructed in Proposition (3.5) and ϖ\varpi is the radial projection from the cone minus the vertex to YY.

Then the lemma follows from elementary calculations.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.