Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
With this lengthy discussion involving the tangent cone in place, we return to the limit space . Recall that we have a sequence of scalings . We consider embeddings
.
Given such a we write for the pull-back of the complex structure on and for the pull-back of times the metric.
Proposition 3.12.
There is a so that we can find an embedding as above, such that
•
•
This follows easily from the general assertions in Section 2.1 about convergence. We now fix this and define
and . We write .
Let be a sequence converging to . We fix distance functions on .
We consider embeddings . Given such maps we write for the pull backs of the metric and complex structure, for the pull-back of and for the pulled back connection.
Proposition 3.13.
For large enough we can choose with the following two properties.
•
•
.
Again this follows from our general discussion of convergence.
Fix large enough, as in Proposition 3.13.
We apply Proposition 3.11 to find a such that the pull-back by of the data has Property (H) over . Now write so . We apply Proposition 2.4 to construct a holomorphic section of , with a fixed bound on the norm and with at points with . Here we are writing for the scaled metric, so in terms of the original metric the condition is .
To finish, suppose has . By construction . Note also that if we set . then
This means that which is less than by our choice of .