2.1. Convergence Theory [02AX]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2.1. Convergence Theory
This subsection is a rapid summary of many formidable results. We will not attempt to give detailed references, but refer to the surveys [4] [5]and the references therein.
Recall that if are two compact metric spaces then the Gromov-Hausdorff distance is the infimum of numbers such that there is a metric on extending the given metrics on the components and such that each of is -dense. The starting point of the theory is Gromov’s Theorem that a sequence of compact -dimensional Riemannian manifolds with bounded diameter and with Ricci curvature bounded below has a Gromov-Hausforff convergent subsequence with some limit , which is a compact metric space. In our situation, with a sequence in the diameter bound follows from the non-collapsing condition (1.2). Passing to this subsequence, we can fix metrics on the disjoint unions such that are dense, where .
Now suppose that, as in our situation, the Ricci tensors of satisfy fixed upper and lower bounds. Suppose also that a non-collapsing condition (1.2) holds and the volumes are bounded below. Then there is a connected, open, dense subset which is an -dimensional -manifold and has a Riemannian metric (for all Hölder exponents .) This is compatible with the metric space structure in the following sense. For any compact we can find a number such that if are points of with then is the infimum of the length of paths in between . Moreover the convergence on this subset is , in the following sense. Given any number and compact subset we can find for large enough open embeddings of an open neighbourhood of into such that:
- (1)
The pull-backs by the of the converge in over to .
- (2)
for all .
The second item here refers to the chosen metric on .
The volume form of the Riemannian metric on the dense set defines a measure on and the volume of is the limit of the volumes of the . The Hausdorff dimension of the singular set does not exceed .
There is a variant of the theory in which one considers spaces with base points and convergence over bounded distance from the base points. In particular we can take a point and any sequence and then consider the sequence of based metric spaces given by scaling by a factor . The compactness theorem implies that, passing to a subsequence, we get convergence and a fundamental result is that, under our hypotheses, the limit of such is a metric cone —a tangent cone of at . Here is a metric space which contains a dense open subset which is a smooth -dimensional Einstein manifold, with Ricci curvature equal to , and the metric and Riemannian structures on are related in a similar way to that above. Likewise for the natural measure on . The singular set has Hausdorff dimension at most . The cone has a smooth Ricci-flat metric outside the singular set (where is the vertex of the cone) and the convergence of the rescaled metrics is in the same sense as before. An important numerical invariant of this situation is the volume ratio
| (2.1) |
The Bishop inequality implies that and if a noncollapsing bound like (1.2) holds for the original manifolds we have .
All of the preceding discussion is in the general Riemannian context. Suppose now that our manifolds are and we have additional structures as in Section 1. We define a polarised limit space to be a metric limit as above, together with extra data as follows
- •
A complex structure on the regular set with respect to which the metric is Kähler with -form .
- •
A line bundle over the regular set;
- •
A connection on with curvature .
(Notice that the integrability theorem for complex structures extends to the situation [16]. Thus in fact we could say that and have smooth structures while the convergence is in . But this is largely irrelevant for our purposes.)
We define convergence of a sequence to such a polarised limit by requiring that for compact we have maps as before but in addition so that the pulled back complex structures converge to (in ) and we have bundle isomorphisms with respect to which the connections converge to in . It is straightforward to extend the compactness theorem to this polarised situation, using the fact that is a covariant-constant tensor with respect to the Levi-Civita connection of .
Likewise, the regular part of a tangent cone at a point in has a smooth, Ricci-flat, Kähler metric which is induced from a Sasaki-Einstein structure on . In particular the Kähler form on the smooth part can be written as , where denotes the distance to the vertex of the cone.
A significant difference in the Kähler case is that the singular sets (both in and in ) are known to have Hausdorff codimension at least . (This is conjectured but not established in the real case.) In particular, which will be crucial for us, the codimension is strictly greater than .
In the case of primary interest—Kähler-Einstein metrics–we obtain convergence on compact subsets of the regular sets. (This is also part of the standard literature.) In addition, if we consider the “Fano case”, when is the anticanonical bundle of , then the limit line bundle is just the anticanonical bundle of the regular set in . The reader may well prefer to restrict to this case. More generally, if we just assume (in addition to (1.1), (1.2)) that the metrics have constant scalar curvature, then one can still establish this convergence, for example using the results of Chen and Weber [6].