ScalingStacks

2.2.3 Algebraic construction [02A0]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.2.3 Algebraic construction

Here we suppose that the Delzant polytope PP is integral. We consider all the multiples k​P¯k\overline{P} for integers k≥0k\geq 0 and let BkB_{k} be the set of lattice points

Bk=k​P¯∩𝐙n.B_{k}=k\overline{P}\cap{\bf Z}^{n}.

Let the number of points in BkB_{k} be Nk+1N_{k}+1. We can put all these sets together by considering the cone over PP

cone(P)={(x¯,y)∈𝐑n+1:y≥0,x¯∈yP¯}.cone(P)=\{(\underline{x},y)\in{\bf R}^{n+1}:y\geq 0,\underline{x}\in y\overline{P}\}.

The disjoint union of the sets BkB_{k} can be identified with the set B=c​o​n​e​(P)∩𝐙n+1B=cone(P)\cap{\bf Z}^{n+1}. Now BB is an abelian semi-group under addition and we have a corresponding ring RR over 𝐂{\bf C} with one generator sbs_{b} for each point of b∈Bb\in B and relations sb​sb′=sb+b′s_{b}s_{b^{\prime}}=s_{b+b^{\prime}}. This is a graded ring, R=⨁RkR=\bigoplus R_{k}, where RkR_{k} has a basis sνs_{\nu} corresponding to the points ν\nu of BkB_{k}. Further, there is an obvious action of the torus TcnT_{c}^{n} on RR.

All of these definitions make sense for any convex set PP. The crucial fact is that when the PP is an integral polytope the ring is finitely generated. Thus there is a corresponding projective variety Xalg=Proj⁡(R)X_{{\rm alg}}={\rm Proj}(R), and the group action on RR defines an action on XalgX_{{\rm alg}}. Second, if PP is Delzant, then XalgX_{{\rm alg}} is smooth and of course this recovers the same complex manifold Xcx.X_{{\rm cx.}}. The vector spaces RkR_{k} are the sections

Rk=H0​(Xcx.,Lk)R_{k}=H^{0}(X_{{\rm cx.}},L^{k})

and it is not hard to see that for any k≥1k\geq 1 the sections give an embedding Xcx.→𝐏⁡(Rk∗)X_{{\rm cx.}}\rightarrow{\bf P}(R_{k}^{*}). From this algebro-geometric point of view the integer λr​(ν)−cr\lambda_{r}(\nu)-c_{r}, for lattice points ν∈P¯\nu\in\overline{P}, is the order of vanishing of the section sνs_{\nu} along the corresponding divisor in Xcx.X_{{\rm cx.}}.

Example Let PP be the square (0,1)2⊂𝐑2(0,1)^{2}\subset{\bf R}^{2}. The corresponding manifold is the product S2×S2S^{2}\times S^{2}. The points in B1B_{1} are the four vertices p0=(0,0),p1=(0,1),p2=(1,0),p3=(1,1)p_{0}=(0,0),p_{1}=(0,1),p_{2}=(1,0),p_{3}=(1,1) so R1R_{1} has a corresponding basis s0​s1,s2,s3s_{0}s_{1},s_{2},s_{3} say. The equation p0+p3=p1+p2p_{0}+p_{3}=p_{1}+p_{2} goes over to the relation s0​s3=s1​s2s_{0}s_{3}=s_{1}s_{2}. The embedding of Xcx.X_{{\rm cx.}} in 𝐏3{\bf P}^{3} has image the quadric hypersurface cut out by the equation Z0​Z1−Z2​Z3=0Z_{0}Z_{1}-Z_{2}Z_{3}=0.

When the polytope PP is integral but not Delzant the variety XalgX_{{\rm alg}} we construct is singular. If each vertex lies on exactly nn codimension-1 faces then XalgX_{{\rm alg}} is an orbifold. Much of the theory, including the differential-geometric constructions, extends easily to this case.

To sum up we have three ways—complex, symplectic and algebraic— of constructing a compact manifold associated to an integral Delzant polytope. From now on we will just denote this by XX.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.