ScalingStacks

2.2.2 Symplectic construction [029Z]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.2.2 Symplectic construction

Here we start with the product P×TnP\times T^{n} with standard co-ordinates xa,θax^{a},\theta_{a} as before, except of course that now the θa\theta_{a} are taken to be “angular” co-ordinates with period 4​π4\pi. This is a noncompact symplectic manifold with the standard symplectic form Ω=∑d​xa​d​θa\Omega=\sum dx^{a}d\theta_{a} and with Hamiltionian TnT^{n} action whose moment map is the projection to PP. The essential point is that this can be compactified to a compact symplectic manifold XsympX_{{\rm symp}} and the moment map extends to a map with image the closure P¯\overline{P}. This works in a similar fashion to the complex picture. For example, consider the neighbourhood of a vertex of PP which as usual we can take to be the origin, with PP locally modelled on {xi>0}\{x^{i}>0\}. Then Ω\Omega is the pull-back of the standard form on 𝐂n{\bf C}^{n} under the map

(xa,θa)↦(|xa|1/2​ei​θa),(x^{a},\theta_{a})\mapsto(|x_{a}|^{1/2}e^{i\theta_{a}}),

We adjoin a neighbourhood of 00 in 𝐂n{\bf C}^{n} to P×TnP\times T^{n} using this map and repeat the construction, modified in the obvious way, for all other boundary points of PP.

Now of course this symplectic construction describes the same object as the complex construction in the previous section. We return to the discussion of the local differential geometry taking now Q=PQ=P. We can start with an admissible Kahler potential ϕ\phi on 𝐑n=V∗{\bf R}^{n}=V^{*}. Then its Legendre transform is a function on PP. Around a vertex, as above, this has the form

u=∑xi​log⁡xi+v,u=\sum x^{i}\log x^{i}+v,

where vv is a smooth function (on the manifold with corners). We say that a symplectic potential uu is admissible if it is the Legendre transform of an admissible Kahler potential ϕ\phi. Stated explicitly in terms of uu this the requirement of “Guillemin boundary conditions”, which are

  1. 1.

    uu is a continuous function on P¯\overline{P}, smooth in the interior.

  2. 2.

    The restriction of uu to each face is smooth and strictly convex.

  3. 3.

    Let qq a boundary point which lies on a codimension rr face of PP, so without loss of generality q=0q=0 and PP is locally defined by equations x1>0,…​xr>0x^{1}>0,\dots x^{r}>0. Then near qq

    u=∑i=1rxi​log⁡xi+vu=\sum_{i=1}^{r}x_{i}\log x_{i}+v

    where vv is smooth.

It is easy to see that such functions exist. For example we can take the Guillemin function

u=∑r(λr−cr)​log⁡(λr−cr).u=\sum_{r}(\lambda_{r}-c_{r})\log(\lambda_{r}-c_{r}).

Either way, we get a map from the complex manifold Xcx.X_{{\rm cx.}} to the symplectic manifold XsympX_{{\rm symp}} which matches up the structures involved.

Example The round metric on S2S^{2}, of area 2​π2\pi, is defined by the symplectic potential, on the interval [0,1][0,1],

u⁡(x)=(x​log⁡x+(1−x)​log⁡(1−x)).u(x)=\left(x\log x+(1-x)\log(1-x)\right).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.