ScalingStacks

Proof. [0241]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

In the gluing region x1∼C~​x2x_{1}\sim\tilde{C}x_{2}, namely x1,x2x_{1},x_{2} and x~1\tilde{x}_{1} are comparably large, the deviation between ϕD1(2)\phi_{D_{1}}^{(2)} and uu comes from the O⁡(e−c​x21/2)O(e^{-cx_{2}^{1/2}}) small deviation between the Tian-Yau potential and the Calabi ansatz, and the correction term x~1n+2n−2​nn−1​U\tilde{x}_{1}^{\frac{n+2}{n}-\frac{2n}{n-1}}U. Ignoring the exponentially small effects, the only important term is x~1n+2n−2​nn−1​x21n−1\tilde{x}_{1}^{\frac{n+2}{n}-\frac{2n}{n-1}}x_{2}^{\frac{1}{n-1}}. We compute from Lemma 4.7

‖d​dc​(η​x~1n+2n−2​nn−1​x21n−1)‖k,α,l​o​c=O⁡(x1n+2n−2​nn−1+1n−1−2+n−2n)=O⁡(x1−2​n−1n−1).\left\lVert dd^{c}(\eta\tilde{x}_{1}^{\frac{n+2}{n}-\frac{2n}{n-1}}x_{2}^{\frac{1}{n-1}})\right\rVert_{k,\alpha,loc}=O(x_{1}^{\frac{n+2}{n}-\frac{2n}{n-1}+\frac{1}{n-1}-2+\frac{n-2}{n}})=O(x_{1}^{-\frac{2n-1}{n-1}}).

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.