3 More on the ODE reduction [022T]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
3 More on the ODE reduction
The aim of this section is to study further the ODE reduction (7) from the special case of the NA MA equation. It turns out the ODE can be solved exactly, and the solution is related to the hypergeometric function.
3.1 Reformulations of the ODE
First reformulation of the ODE
The ODE (7) can be somewhat further simplified:
Lemma 3.1.
Under the substitution , the ODE (7) is equivalent to
| (10) |
Proof.
Remark 3.2.
The Kähler condition (cf. Remark 2.5) translates into
Remark 3.3.
In terms of the substitution , the boundary condition at becomes
| (11) |
In the normalization of the ODE
| (12) |
we would have
Notice determines , which means this boundary condition at comes in a 1-parameter family, instead of the generic 2-parameter family for second order ODEs. The end has a closely related boundary condition via the ODE symmetry (cf. Remark 3.3), which also arises in a 1-parameter family, so one expects the global solutions to the ODE to be isolated.
Second reformulation of the ODE
3.2 First integral of the ODE
Proof.
We differentiate
Now the result follows by observing that, from the initial conditions we have
∎
This first integral can be solved explicitly. Rewriting the first integral in terms of the rescaled variables and , the ODE simplifies to the form
We introduce the function
then
| (18) |
Inverting solves as a function of . It is clear that
The ODE (14) then implies , namely the Kähler condition is satisfied. We remark that can be expressed in terms of the hypergeometric functions, cf. the Appendix.
We then check the initial conditions and the analyticity of the solution near .
Corollary 3.5.
The function is a power series in near . To leading orders
| (19) |
3.3 Global matching problem
We have solved the ODE with the prescribed initial condition, on the interval . For the application to the generalized Calabi ansatz, we need solutions over , and for this purpose the ODE (14) is inadequate. From the ODE (12), it is however a priori clear that is not a singularity.
Lemma 3.6.
For any given , the solution to the ODE (12) exists smoothly on for some .
Proof.
The ODE (12) can be smoothly extended as long as remains bounded positively below and remains bounded (which imply boundedness of , and in particular the boundedness of ). Notice
so is monotone increasing, and in particular positive. By
we see will be bounded as long as is bounded positively below.
The convexity of is ensured whenever the solution is smooth. Thus for some small ,
For small , we have and , so , whence has an a priori lower bound slightly beyond . ∎
Recall the ODE has a symmetry under (cf. Remark 3.3). Our strategy to achieve both the and the boundary conditions, is to look for symmetric solutions:
This is a functional equation on , and it amounts to a matching condition at :
This is equivalent to
| (20) |
The problem is then to look for to solve (20). The key is to extract from the asymptote of as , namely . The starting point is the identity
| (21) |
which means the value of is related to the Legendre transform of .
3.4 Legendre transform
The Legendre transform of the convex function is given by
In particular, we have
We are now going to rewrite the first integral (17) in terms of . First, since we see from (17) that
and so the Legendre transform is defined on this interval. Furthermore, since we have , and by the properties of the Legendre transform. Now from the involution property of the Legendre transform,
The first integral (17) is rewritten as
namely
To simplify matters we can rescale. Define
Then the ODE is recast on the interval as
| (22) |
subject to the initial conditions
This can be integrated explicitly:
Lemma 3.7.
Proof.
First note that if solves the equation, then so does for any constant . Thus, we may reduce to the initial condition below. The initial condition specifies a sign choice of the square root, whence
and the Lemma is reduced to Prop. 5.3. ∎
We can implement the matching condition as follows. From (21) and the definition of the Legendre transform,
On the other hand, we have
but from the first integral we have as , while . Thus we get
All together, the matching amounts to solving the equation
Or equivalently
which yields
| (23) |
which tends to as . For our purpose the important fact is that for , which means we have found the initial condition that ensures matching.
Remark 3.8.
If , then , so , and . The matching condition has no positive solution. Correspondingly, our generalization of the Calabi ansatz only yield nontrivial examples in dimension at least three.