ScalingStacks

3.2 First integral of the ODE [0231]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

3.2 First integral of the ODE

Lemma 3.4.

If 𝔴\mathfrak{w} solves the ODE (14) with the initial condition (16), then

nβˆ’1n​(d​𝔴d​s)n+12​𝔴2=12​w02.\frac{n-1}{n}(\frac{d\mathfrak{w}}{ds})^{n}+\frac{1}{2\mathfrak{w}^{2}}=\frac{1}{2w_{0}^{2}}. (17)
Proof.

We differentiate

dd​s​((nβˆ’1)n​(d​𝔴d​s)n+12​𝔴2)\displaystyle\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{(n-1)}{n}\left(\frac{d\mathfrak{w}}{ds}\right)^{n}+\frac{1}{2\mathfrak{w}^{2}}\right) =(nβˆ’1)​(d​𝔴d​s)nβˆ’1​(d2​𝔴d​s2)βˆ’π”΄βˆ’3​d​𝔴d​s\displaystyle=(n-1)\left(\frac{d\mathfrak{w}}{ds}\right)^{n-1}\left(\frac{d^{2}\mathfrak{w}}{ds^{2}}\right)-\mathfrak{w}^{-3}\frac{d\mathfrak{w}}{ds}
=(d​𝔴d​s)​(dd​s​(d​𝔴d​s)nβˆ’1βˆ’π”΄βˆ’3)\displaystyle=\left(\frac{d\mathfrak{w}}{ds}\right)\left(\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{d\mathfrak{w}}{ds}\right)^{n-1}-\mathfrak{w}^{-3}\right)
=0\displaystyle=0

Now the result follows by observing that, from the initial conditions we have

((nβˆ’1)n​(d​𝔴d​s)n+12​𝔴2)|s=1=12​w02.\left(\frac{(n-1)}{n}\left(\frac{d\mathfrak{w}}{ds}\right)^{n}+\frac{1}{2\mathfrak{w}^{2}}\right)\bigg|_{s=1}=\frac{1}{2w_{0}^{2}}.

∎

This first integral can be solved explicitly. Rewriting the first integral in terms of the rescaled variables 𝔴w0\frac{\mathfrak{w}}{w_{0}} and (2​(nβˆ’1)nw0n+2)βˆ’1/ns\left(\frac{2(n-1)}{n}w_{0}^{n+2}\right)^{-1/n}s, the ODE simplifies to the form

fβ€²n=1βˆ’fβˆ’2.f^{\prime n}=1-f^{-2}.

We introduce the function

F(x)=∫1x(1βˆ’yβˆ’2)βˆ’1/ndy,F(x)=\int_{1}^{x}(1-y^{-2})^{-1/n}dy,

then

F(𝔴w0)=(2​(nβˆ’1)nw0n+2)βˆ’1/n(sβˆ’1).F(\frac{\mathfrak{w}}{w_{0}})=\left(\frac{2(n-1)}{n}w_{0}^{n+2}\right)^{-1/n}(s-1). (18)

Inverting FF solves 𝔴\mathfrak{w} as a function of ss. It is clear that

𝔴>0,d​𝔴d​s>0.\mathfrak{w}>0,\quad\frac{d\mathfrak{w}}{ds}>0.

The ODE (14) then implies d2​𝔴d​s2>0\frac{d^{2}\mathfrak{w}}{ds^{2}}>0, namely the KΓ€hler condition is satisfied. We remark that FF can be expressed in terms of the hypergeometric functions, cf. the Appendix.

We then check the initial conditions and the analyticity of the solution near s=1s=1.

Corollary 3.5.

The function 𝔴⁑(s)\mathfrak{w}(s) is a power series in (sβˆ’1)n/(nβˆ’1)(s-1)^{n/(n-1)} near s=1s=1. To leading orders

𝔴=w0+nβˆ’1n​w0βˆ’3nβˆ’1​(sβˆ’1)nnβˆ’1+O⁑((sβˆ’1)2​nnβˆ’1).\mathfrak{w}=w_{0}+\frac{n-1}{n}w_{0}^{-\frac{3}{n-1}}(s-1)^{\frac{n}{n-1}}+O((s-1)^{\frac{2n}{n-1}}). (19)
Proof.

Notice near y=1y=1, the function

(1βˆ’yβˆ’2)βˆ’1/n=(yβˆ’1)βˆ’1/nΓ—Taylor series inΒ yβˆ’1Β with constant termΒ 2βˆ’1/n.(1-y^{-2})^{-1/n}=(y-1)^{-1/n}\times\text{Taylor series in $y-1$ with constant term $2^{-1/n}$}.

Upon integration,

F⁑(x)=(xβˆ’1)(nβˆ’1)/nΓ—Taylor series inΒ xβˆ’1Β with constant termΒ 2βˆ’1/nnnβˆ’1.F(x)=(x-1)^{(n-1)/n}\times\text{Taylor series in $x-1$ with constant term $2^{-1/n}\frac{n}{n-1}$}.

Raising (18) to the power n/(nβˆ’1)n/(n-1), we see

w0βˆ’n+2nβˆ’1​(sβˆ’1)n/(nβˆ’1)=Taylor series in 𝔴w0βˆ’1Β with first coefficientΒ nnβˆ’1.w_{0}^{-\frac{n+2}{n-1}}(s-1)^{n/(n-1)}=\text{Taylor series in $\frac{\mathfrak{w}}{w_{0}}-1$ with first coefficient $\frac{n}{n-1}$}.

Inverting the function, 𝔴w0βˆ’1\frac{\mathfrak{w}}{w_{0}}-1 is a power series of (sβˆ’1)n/(nβˆ’1)(s-1)^{n/(n-1)} near s=1s=1. To leading order,

𝔴w0βˆ’1=nβˆ’1n​w0βˆ’n+2nβˆ’1​(sβˆ’1)nnβˆ’1​(1+O⁑((sβˆ’1)n2​nβˆ’1)),\frac{\mathfrak{w}}{w_{0}}-1=\frac{n-1}{n}w_{0}^{-\frac{n+2}{n-1}}(s-1)^{\frac{n}{n-1}}\left(1+O((s-1)^{\frac{n}{2n-1}})\right),
d​𝔴d​sβ‰ˆw0βˆ’3nβˆ’1​(sβˆ’1)1/(nβˆ’1)=b1​(sβˆ’1)1/(nβˆ’1),\frac{d\mathfrak{w}}{ds}\approx w_{0}^{-\frac{3}{n-1}}(s-1)^{1/(n-1)}=b_{1}(s-1)^{1/(n-1)},

which agrees with the initial condition (16). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.