Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
Note that by the Cheng-Yau gradient estimate, we have
|
|
|
(7.17) |
Now using Theorem 1.3 we know for each that
|
|
|
(7.18) |
In particular, let us consider the sets
|
|
|
(7.19) |
where . For the set ,
we have the cover . We can choose a finite subcovering such that the balls are mutually disjoint.
Using (7.18) we have
|
|
|
(7.20) |
On each ball we can use standard elliptic estimates along with the
gradient bound to get the scale-invariant estimate
|
|
|
(7.21) |
for any . In particular, if we choose and pick , then we have
|
|
|
(7.22) |
Combining this with (7.18) gives us
|
|
|
(7.23) |
Finally, by summing over we get the estimate
|
|
|
(7.24) |
as claimed.
∎