ScalingStacks

Proof. [01Z2]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Note that by the Cheng-Yau gradient estimate, we have

supB3/2​(p)|∇u|≤C⁡(n).\displaystyle\sup_{B_{3/2}(p)}|\nabla u|\leq C(n)\,. (7.17)

Now using Theorem 1.3 we know for each ϵ>0\epsilon>0 that

Vol⁡(Tr​({x∈B1​(p):rh​(x)≤r}))≤Cϵ​(n,v,ϵ)​r4−ϵ.\displaystyle{\rm Vol}(T_{r}(\{x\in B_{1}(p):r_{h}(x)\leq r\}))\leq C_{\epsilon}(n,{\rm v},\epsilon)r^{4-\epsilon}\,. (7.18)

In particular, let us consider the sets

𝒞α≡{x∈B1​(p):rα≤rh​(x)≤rα−1},\displaystyle\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}\equiv\{x\in B_{1}(p):r_{\alpha}\leq r_{h}(x)\leq r_{\alpha-1}\}\,, (7.19)

where rα≡2−αr_{\alpha}\equiv 2^{-\alpha}. For the set 𝒞α\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}, we have the cover {Brα​(x)}x∈𝒞α\{B_{r_{\alpha}}(x)\}_{x\in\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}}. We can choose a finite subcovering {Brα/2​(xi)}1Nα\{B_{r_{\alpha}/2}(x_{i})\}_{1}^{N_{\alpha}} such that the balls Brα/8​(xi)B_{r_{\alpha}/8}(x_{i}) are mutually disjoint. Using (7.18) we have

Nα≤Cϵ​rα4−n−ϵ.\displaystyle N_{\alpha}\leq C_{\epsilon}r_{\alpha}^{4-n-\epsilon}\,. (7.20)

On each ball Brα/2​(xj)B_{r_{\alpha}/2}(x_{j}) we can use standard elliptic estimates along with the gradient bound |∇u|≤C⁡(n)|\nabla u|\leq C(n) to get the scale-invariant estimate

rαq​⨏Brα/2​(xj)|∇2u|q≤C⁡(n,v,q),\displaystyle r_{\alpha}^{q}\fint_{B_{r_{\alpha}/2}(x_{j})}|\nabla^{2}u|^{q}\leq C(n,{\rm v},q)\,, (7.21)

for any q<∞q<\infty. In particular, if we choose q<4q<4 and pick ϵ=4−q2\epsilon=\frac{4-q}{2}, then we have

∫Brα/2​(xj)|∇2u|q≤C⁡(n,v)​rαn−4+2​ϵ.\displaystyle\int_{B_{r_{\alpha}/2}(x_{j})}|\nabla^{2}u|^{q}\leq C(n,{\rm v})\,r_{\alpha}^{n-4+2\epsilon}\,. (7.22)

Combining this with (7.18) gives us

∫𝒞α|∇2u|q≤C⁡(n,v)​rαn−4+2​ϵ⋅Nα≤C⁡(n,v,q)​rαϵ.\displaystyle\int_{\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}}|\nabla^{2}u|^{q}\leq C(n,{\rm v})\,r_{\alpha}^{n-4+2\epsilon}\cdot N_{\alpha}\leq C(n,{\rm v},q)\,r_{\alpha}^{\epsilon}\,. (7.23)

Finally, by summing over 𝒞α\mathcal{C}_{\alpha} we get the estimate

∫B1​(p)|∇2u|q≤C⁡(n,v,p)​λq​∑αrαϵ=C​∑2−ϵ​α=C⁡(n,v,q),\displaystyle\int_{B_{1}(p)}|\nabla^{2}u|^{q}\leq C(n,{\rm v},p)\lambda^{q}\,\sum_{\alpha}r_{\alpha}^{\epsilon}=C\,\sum 2^{-\epsilon\alpha}=C(n,{\rm v},q)\,, (7.24)

as claimed. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.