ScalingStacks

5.3. Proof of Hausdorff Estimates of Theorem 1.1 [01YQ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

5.3. Proof of Hausdorff Estimates of Theorem 1.1

With Theorem 5.3 in hand, the proof of Theorem 1.1 becomes standard, and follows the same lines as the proof of Corollary 5.2. Thus, consider a sequence

(Mjn,dj,pj)→(X,d,p)\displaystyle(M^{n}_{j},d_{j},p_{j})\to(X,d,p) (5.11)

of Riemannian manifolds satisfying |RicMjn|≤n−1|{\rm Ric}_{M^{n}_{j}}|\leq n-1 and Vol⁡(B1​(pj))>v>0{\rm Vol}(B_{1}(p_{j}))>{\rm v}>0, which Gromov-Hausdorff converge to some XX. Recall again the standard stratification of XX, which is reviewed in Section 2.1. More specifically let us consider the closed stratum 𝒮n−4​(X)⊆X\mathcal{S}^{n-4}(X)\subseteq X. On the one hand, we have from [ChCo1]

dim𝒮n−4≤n−4.\displaystyle\dim\mathcal{S}^{n-4}\leq n-4\,. (5.12)

On the other hand, we have that for every point x∉𝒮n−4x\not\in\mathcal{S}^{n-4}, there exists some tangent cone at xx which is isometric to ℝn−3×C⁡(Y)\mathds{R}^{n-3}\times C(Y). That is, for some sequence ra→0r_{a}\to 0 we have

(X,ra−1​d,x)→ℝn−3×C⁡(Y).\displaystyle(X,r_{a}^{-1}d,x)\to\mathds{R}^{n-3}\times C(Y)\,. (5.13)

However, by Theorem 5.3, we have that YY is isometric to the unit 22-sphere, and hence,

(X,ra−1​d,x)→ℝn.\displaystyle(X,r_{a}^{-1}d,x)\to\mathds{R}^{n}\,. (5.14)

Then for a∈ℕa\in\mathds{N} sufficiently large, we can apply the standard ϵ\epsilon-regularity theorem, Theorem 2.3, to see that rh​(x)>0r_{h}(x)>0, and hence that a neighborhood of xx is a C1,αC^{1,\alpha} Riemannian manifold, which proves the theorem.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.