ScalingStacks

Proof. [01YF]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

As in Lemma 4.1, choose a lower triangular matrix A∈G​L​(n−2)A\in GL(n-2) such that

u′=A∘u:B2​r​(x)→ℝn−2\displaystyle u^{\prime}=A\circ u:B_{2r}(x)\to\mathds{R}^{n-2} (4.18)

is an ϵ\epsilon-splitting and define the measure μ′\mu^{\prime} as in Lemma 4.1. Then as in (4.5), μ′=det(A)​μ\mu^{\prime}=\det(A)\mu.

Since u′u^{\prime} is an ϵ\epsilon-splitting, we have the estimates

⨏B2​r​(x)||ω′|−1|≤C⁡(n)​ϵ,\displaystyle\fint_{B_{2r}(x)}||\omega^{\prime}|-1|\leq C(n)\epsilon\,,
u′​(Br​(x))⊆B2​r​(u′​(x)).\displaystyle u^{\prime}(B_{r}(x))\subseteq B_{2r}(u^{\prime}(x))\,. (4.19)

By the first estimate above,

μ′​(Br​(x))\displaystyle\mu^{\prime}(B_{r}(x)) =(∫B2​(p)|ω|)−1​∫Br​(x)|ω′|,\displaystyle=\Big(\int_{B_{2}(p)}|\omega|\Big)^{-1}\int_{B_{r}(x)}|\omega^{\prime}|\,,
≥(1−C⁡(n)​ϵ)​Vol​(Br​(x))Vol​(B2​(p))​⨏Br​(x)|ω′|\displaystyle\geq(1-C(n)\epsilon)\frac{{\rm Vol}(B_{r}(x))}{{\rm Vol}(B_{2}(p))}\fint_{B_{r}(x)}|\omega^{\prime}|
≥(1−C​ϵ)​Vol​(Br​(x))Vol​(B3​(x))≥C⁡(n)​rn,\displaystyle\geq(1-C\epsilon)\frac{{\rm Vol}(B_{r}(x))}{{\rm Vol}(B_{3}(x))}\geq C(n)r^{n}\,, (4.20)

where in the last step we have used volume monotonicity for the Riemannian measure. On the other hand, by the second estimate of (4.19),

|u′​(Br​(x))|≤C⁡(n)​rn−2.\displaystyle|u^{\prime}(B_{r}(x))|\leq C(n)r^{n-2}\,. (4.21)

Combining these gives the estimate

|u′​(Br​(x))|≤C⁡(n)​r−2​μ′​(Br​(x)).\displaystyle|u^{\prime}(B_{r}(x))|\leq C(n)r^{-2}\mu^{\prime}(B_{r}(x))\,. (4.22)

To relate these back to the original function uu, we observe that

|u′​(Br​(x))|\displaystyle|u^{\prime}(B_{r}(x))| =det(A)​|u⁡(Br​(x))|,\displaystyle=\det(A)|u(B_{r}(x))|\,,
μ′​(Br​(x))\displaystyle\mu^{\prime}(B_{r}(x)) =det(A)​|μ⁡(Br​(x))|,\displaystyle=\det(A)|\mu(B_{r}(x))|\,, (4.23)

which immediately gives

|u⁡(Br​(x))|≤C⁡(n)​r−2​μ​(Br​(x)).\displaystyle|u(B_{r}(x))|\leq C(n)r^{-2}\mu(B_{r}(x))\,. (4.24)

This completes the proof. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.