ScalingStacks

6.1 Reduction to potential estimates

The common part of the strategy is to reduce the existence question of special Lagrangians to C0C^{0}-estimate on the potential.

Given a fixed snc model 𝒳→S\mathcal{X}\to S, there is a logarithm map Log𝒳:Xt→Δ𝒳\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}:X_{t}\to\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} defined up to O⁑(1|log⁑|t||)O(\frac{1}{|\log|t||}) coordinate ambiguity. Given an nn-dimensional face Ξ”J\Delta_{J} of S​k​(X)βŠ‚Ξ”π’³Sk(X)\subset\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}, we consider the preimage UJ,tβŠ‚XtU_{J,t}\subset X_{t} under the logarithm map, of a slightly shrinked version of the interior of Ξ”J\Delta_{J}. We will take the liberty of shrinking UJ,tU_{J,t} several times, as long as the deleted sets have negligible Calabi-Yau measure in the tβ†’0t\to 0 limit. Since UJ,tU_{J,t} can be regarded as a torus invariant subset of (β„‚βˆ—)n(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}, we can make sense of Cl​o​ckC^{k}_{loc} norms uniformly in tt, by passing to the universal cover with the coordinates log⁑zilog⁑|t|\frac{\log z_{i}}{\log|t|}.

The first main step is to improve C0C^{0}-estimate to C∞C^{\infty}-estimate.

003G

Proposition 6.3. (cf. [53, section 4.5]) Let Ο•0\phi_{0} be an Alexandrov solution of the real MA equation (17) on the interior of Ξ”J\Delta_{J}. Suppose the Calabi-Yau metrics on UJ,tU_{J,t} admit local potential functions Ο•C​Y,J,t\phi_{CY,J,t} such that Ο‰C​Y,t=d​dc​ϕC​Y,J,t\omega_{CY,t}=dd^{c}\phi_{CY,J,t}, and β€–Ο•C​Y,J,tβˆ’Ο•0∘Log𝒳‖C0β†’0\left\lVert\phi_{CY,J,t}-\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\to 0 as tβ†’0t\to 0. Then after slightly shrinking UJ,tU_{J,t}, we have the C∞C^{\infty}-asymptote β€–Ο•C​Y,J,tβˆ’Ο•0∘Log𝒳‖Cl​o​ckβ†’0.\left\lVert\phi_{CY,J,t}-\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}\right\rVert_{C^{k}_{loc}}\to 0.

003H

Proof. (Sketch)

  • β€’

    The first ingredient is that by the regularity theory of real MA equation (cf. section 4.5), after deleting a subset of Int​(Ξ”J)\text{Int}(\Delta_{J}) of Hausdorff (nβˆ’1)(n-1)-measure zero, then Ο•0\phi_{0} is smooth. After a slight shrinking of the remaining open set, then Ο•0\phi_{0} has CkC^{k} bounds.

  • β€’

    The second ingredient is Savin’s small perturbation theorem (cf. section 4.8). After passing to the local universal cover, both Ο•C​Y,J,t\phi_{CY,J,t} and Ο•0∘Log𝒳\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}} solve a complex Monge-AmpΓ¨re equation. The difference in their RHS vanishes in the tβ†’0t\to 0 limit in arbitrarily high CkC^{k} norm, as a consequence of the volume form asymptote in section 3.1. Savin’s result then improves the C0C^{0} closeness of Ο•C​Y,J,t\phi_{CY,J,t} and Ο•0∘Log𝒳\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}} to Cl​o​c∞C^{\infty}_{loc} closeness, after small shrinking of UJ,tU_{J,t}.

∎

Prop. 6.3 implies the semiflat metric asymptote on the slightly shrinked UJ,tU_{J,t}, with C∞C^{\infty} small error in the tβ†’0t\to 0 limit:

Ο‰C​Y,t∼d​dc​(Ο•0∘Log𝒳)=βˆ’14​π​|log⁑|t||2β€‹βˆ‘i,jβˆ‚2Ο•0βˆ‚xiβ€‹βˆ‚xj​d​log⁑zi∧d​log⁑zjΒ―.\omega_{CY,t}\sim dd^{c}(\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}})=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4\pi|\log|t||^{2}}\sum_{i,j}\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{j}}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\overline{\log z_{j}}. (19)

In terms of the Riemannian metric tensors,

gC​Y,t∼12​π​|log⁑|t||2​Re​{βˆ‘1≀i,j≀nβˆ‚2Ο•0βˆ‚xiβ€‹βˆ‚xj​d​log⁑ziβŠ—d​log⁑zΒ―j}.g_{CY,t}\sim\frac{1}{2\pi|\log|t||^{2}}\text{Re}\{\sum_{1\leq i,j\leq n}\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{j}}d\log z_{i}\otimes d\log\bar{z}_{j}\}. (20)

In particular the Riemannian curvature stays uniformly bounded in UJ,tU_{J,t}. By the perturbation theory of special Lagrangians reviewed in section 4.6, the TnT^{n} fibres of the logarithm map can be made into a special Lagrangian fibration by a C∞C^{\infty} small perturbation, on a slightly shrinked subset.

Suppose the assumption of Prop. 6.3 holds on all the nn-dimensional faces of S​k​(X)Sk(X), then the union of all UJ,tU_{J,t} cover almost all the CY measure on XtX_{t}, and the measure lost in the domain shrinking process is negligible. The weak metric version of the SYZ conjecture then follows.

003I

Remark 14. A subtlety is that the local regularity theory of real Monge-AmpΓ¨re equation allows for Hausdorff codimension 1+Ο΅1+\epsilon singularities. This means the codimension two singularity prediction in the Kontsevich-Soibelman conjecture cannot follow simply from the above argument. One must find a more global argument on S​k​(X)Sk(X), not just on the interior of its nn-dimensional faces.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.