5.4 NA Monge-Ampère measure
The NA Monge-Ampère measure [11] is defined through intersection theory in a somewhat counterintuitive manner. As a motivation, we consider the complex analytic setting of an snc model over an algebraic curve, equipped with a Hermitian line bundle with curvature form in the class . Then defines a family of -forms on , such that equals the intersection number . The question is to describe the limit of these -forms, when we view as converging to the dual intersection complex (cf. section 3.1).
We write .
Recall that the regions on corresponding to the faces in the dual intersection complex are from the algebraic perspective only small neighbourhoods of . Thus the limit of can only be supported at the vertices of , which correspond to the components . The amount of delta masses concentrated at the vertices are
|
|
|
where appears due to the multiplicity of the sheets. Reassuringly,
|
|
|
gives the correct total mass.
Back to the NA setting,
given a model -line bundle for , we write , and denote the divisorial points associated to as . We
can then define the NA Monge-Ampère measure for the model metric as the following signed atomic measure supported at :
|
|
|
This definition is compatible with pullback of line bundles by the projection formula, and ensures the total mass is the intersection number . If is furthermore semipositive, then the intersection numbers are non-negative, so is a measure.
The theory of NA MA measures bears strong resemblance to the complex MA measures [4][5]:
- β’
In the complex analytic world, one first define the complex MA for smooth potentials. A general continuous semipositive potential in a KΓ€hler class is the uniform limit of smooth potentials, and its complex MA measure is then determined by the weak continuity under -convergence.
- β’
In the NA world, one first define the NA MA measure for the model metrics. A general continuous semipositive metric on is the uniform limit of a sequence of continuous semipositive model metrics [6, Cor. 8.8], and its NA MA measure can be defined as the unique limiting Radon measure of the NA MA measures for the sequence [4, Cor. 3.5].
Their main difference lies in the highly nonlocal appearance of the NA MA measure. The recent result of Vilsmeier [76] offers a more concrete perspective:
0038
Proposition 5.4. (NA MA-real MA comparison) Let be a semistable snc model of , and be an -dimensional open face of . Recall the retraction map . Let be the potential of a semipositive metric , and suppose on , then on the pushforward of the NA MA measure
|
|
|
equals the real MA measure of the convex function up to a factor .
The rigorous proof of this comparison uses intersection theory, and the following is a heuristic explanation. Consider an snc model over an algbebraic curve as in the motivation, and assume furthermore that it is semistable. Recall our heuristic dictionary that a metric on should encode a family of Hermitian metrics on , such that in the hybrid topology, and the NA MA measure of should be the limit of the measures associated to the curvature forms of . We now focus on the neighbourhood of an -dimensional open face , where we have local coordinates with , and . In the local picture we identify metrics with potentials, so , and after ignoring -fluctuation effects .
Imposing more smoothness assumptions, the curvature form of is approximately
|
|
|
The NA MA measure should agree with the limiting pushforward measure
|
|
|
which equals the real MA measure up to the factor .