ScalingStacks

3 Large complex structure limit

The SYZ paper does not make precise the notion of large complex structure limit, and several non-equivalent interpretations are available in the current literature. We shall place the large complex structure limit in the framework of polarized degenerations. Intuitively, a polarized degeneration is when we fix the symplectic structure inside an integral class, and vary the complex structure in an algebraic one-parameter family so that it becomes singular in the limit. The large complex structure limit is the additional requirement that the degeneration is ‘as severe as possible’.

We work over ℂ\mathbb{C}. To set the scene,

  • •

    Let SS be a smooth affine algebraic curve, with a point 0∈S0\in S. An algebraic degeneration family is given by a submersive projective morphism π:X→S∖{0}\pi:X\to S\setminus\{0\} with smooth connected nn-dimensional fibres XtX_{t} for t∈S∖{0}t\in S\setminus\{0\}. This is in contrast with the formal setting over the punctured formal disc Spec​(K)\text{Spec}(K) with K=ℂ⁡((t))K=\mathbb{C}(\!(t)\!). An algebraic degeneration induces a formal degeneration by base change.

  • •

    A polarisation is given by an ample line bundle LL over XX. This specifies the Kähler class, up to rescaling conventions.

  • •

    We say π\pi is a degeneration family of Calabi-Yau manifolds if there is a trivialising section Ω\Omega of the canonical bundle KXK_{X}. Over a small disc 𝔻t\mathbb{D}_{t} around 0∈S0\in S, this induces holomorphic volume forms Ωt\Omega_{t} on XtX_{t} via Ω=d​t∧Ωt\Omega=dt\wedge\Omega_{t}. The normalised Calabi-Yau measure on XtX_{t} is the probability measure

    d​μt=Ωt∧Ω¯t∫XtΩt∧Ω¯t.d\mu_{t}=\frac{\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}}{\int_{X_{t}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}}. (5)

    The Calabi-Yau metrics ωC​Y,t\omega_{CY,t} on XtX_{t} are the unique Kähler metrics in the class 1|log⁡|t||​c1​(L)\frac{1}{|\log|t||}c_{1}(L) such that

    ωC​Y,tn∫XtωC​Y,tn=d​μt.\frac{\omega_{CY,t}^{n}}{\int_{X_{t}}\omega_{CY,t}^{n}}=d\mu_{t}. (6)
  • •

    We say π:X→S∖{0}\pi:X\to S\setminus\{0\} is a large complex structure limit of Calabi-Yau manifolds if the essential skeleton has the maximal dimension nn (to be explained below), and the degeneration family admits a semistable snc model over SS.

002J

Remark 2. Filling in the central fibre at 0∈S0\in S would involve the choice of a model of π:X→S\pi:X\to S, namely a normal flat projective SS-scheme 𝒳\mathcal{X} together with an isomorphism with XX over the punctured curve S∖{0}S\setminus\{0\}. It is called an snc model if 𝒳\mathcal{X} is smooth, and the central fibre over 0∈S0\in S is a simple normal crossing divisor in 𝒳\mathcal{X}, such that the intersections of divisors are irreducible or empty. If furthermore the central fibre is reduced, it is called a semistable snc model. Models can be analogously defined over the formal disc. The existence of snc models is a consequence of Hironaka’s resolution theorem. They are highly nonunique. By the semistable reduction theorem [44, chapter 2], after finite base change to another smooth algebraic curve S′S^{\prime}, we can always find some semistable snc model for the degeneration family X×S(S′∖{0})X\times_{S}(S^{\prime}\setminus\{0\}), so the existence of a semistable snc model is not a substantial assumption. Everything here is quasi-projective. The choice of a model is very useful, but not intrinsic to the degenerating CY metrics.

002K

Example 3.1. A typical example of large complex structure limit is the Fermat family of Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces

Xt={Z0Z1…Zn+1+t∑0n+1Zin+2=0}⊂ℂℙn+1.X_{t}=\{Z_{0}Z_{1}\ldots Z_{n+1}+t\sum_{0}^{n+1}Z_{i}^{n+2}=0\}\subset\mathbb{CP}^{n+1}.

As t→0t\to 0, the algebraic limit is the union of n+2n+2 projective planes. Intuitively, the central fibre is highly reducible, and the degeneration is very severe.

002L

Example 3.2. Consider a family of quartic K3 surfaces degenerating to a nodal K3 surface. This is a typical example of a polarized degeneration which is not a large complex structure limit. In fact, the central fibre is irreducible, and the nodal singularity is mild (Kawamata log terminal in the birational geometry terminology).

3.1 Volume asymptote and essential skeleton

Consider an algebraic Calabi-Yau degeneration family X→S∖{0}X\to S\setminus\{0\} as above. We follow [3] to consider the asymptote of ∫XtΩt∧Ω¯t\int_{X_{t}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t} as t→0t\to 0. Along the way, we will introduce the concept of dual intersection complexes and essential skeletons, which are simplicial complexes encoding the intersection patterns of divisors on the central fibre. An important lesson is that the measure theoretic limit of the Calabi-Yau manifolds is closer to simplicial complexes than algebraic varieties, indicating that the metric limit must be significantly different from Fubini-Study metrics associated to projective embeddings of bounded degree.

A very useful tool is to fill in the central fibre by choosing an snc model (cf. Remark 2) 𝒳\mathcal{X} over SS. The central fibre 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0} is an snc divisor with components EiE_{i} for i∈Ii\in I, and we write 𝒳0=∑i∈Ibi​Ei\mathcal{X}_{0}=\sum_{i\in I}b_{i}E_{i}. In the special case of semistable snc models bi=1b_{i}=1 for i∈Ii\in I; this can always be achieved after finite base change. The canonical divisor K𝒳K_{\mathcal{X}} is supported on 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0} as KXK_{X} has a trivialising section Ω\Omega. We may write K𝒳=∑i(ai+bi−1)​EiK_{\mathcal{X}}=\sum_{i}(a_{i}+b_{i}-1)E_{i}, so that the relative log canonical divisor

K𝒳/Sl​o​g:=K𝒳−KS+𝒳0,r​e​d−𝒳0=∑ai​Ei.K^{log}_{\mathcal{X}/S}:=K_{\mathcal{X}}-K_{S}+\mathcal{X}_{0,red}-\mathcal{X}_{0}=\sum a_{i}E_{i}.

Shifting all aia_{i} by a constant κ\kappa is equivalent to multiplying Ω\Omega by tκt^{\kappa}, which gives an elementary factor |t|2​κ|t|^{2\kappa} to ∫XtΩt∧Ω¯t\int_{X_{t}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}. Thus we shall always assume min⁡ai=0\min a_{i}=0.

It is useful to introduce a quantitative stratification on XtX_{t} according to the intersection pattern of EiE_{i}. Let EJ=∩i∈JEiE_{J}=\cap_{i\in J}E_{i} for J⊂IJ\subset I, which is irreducible if nonempty. Using the distance function of a fixed smooth background Kähler metric on 𝒳\mathcal{X}, we can write

EJ0={q∈Xt|d(q,EJ)≪1}∖{q∈Xt|d(q,EJ′)≪1,some J′⊋J}.E_{J}^{0}=\{q\in X_{t}|d(q,E_{J})\ll 1\}\setminus\{q\in X_{t}|d(q,E_{J^{\prime}})\ll 1,\quad\text{some }J^{\prime}\supsetneq J\}.

Around ∅≠EJ⊂𝒳\emptyset\neq E_{J}\subset\mathcal{X}, we denote p=|J|−1p=|J|-1, and introduce local coordinates z0,…​znz_{0},\ldots z_{n} on 𝒳\mathcal{X}, such that z0,z1,…,zpz_{0},z_{1},\ldots,z_{p} are the defining equations of EiE_{i} for i∈Ji\in J. The conditions on the divisors mean that away from deeper strata we may arrange t=∏0pzibit=\prod_{0}^{p}z_{i}^{b_{i}}, and

Ω=uJ​∏0pziai+bi​d​log⁡zi∧∏p+1nd​zj\Omega=u_{J}\prod_{0}^{p}z_{i}^{a_{i}+b_{i}}d\log z_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}dz_{j}

for some local nowhere vanishing holomorphic function uJu_{J}. By definition Ω=d​t∧Ωt\Omega=dt\wedge\Omega_{t} along XtX_{t}, so on EJ0E_{J}^{0}

Ωt=b0−1​uJ​z0a0​…​zpap​∏1pd​log⁡zi∧∏p+1nd​zj,\Omega_{t}=b_{0}^{-1}u_{J}z_{0}^{a_{0}}\ldots z_{p}^{a_{p}}\prod_{1}^{p}d\log z_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}dz_{j},
−1n2​Ωt∧Ω¯t=|b0|−2​|uJ|2​|z0|2​a0​…​|zp|2​ap​∏1p−1​d​log⁡zi∧d​log⁡z¯i∧∏p+1n−1​d​zj∧d​z¯j.\sqrt{-1}^{n^{2}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}=|b_{0}|^{-2}|u_{J}|^{2}|z_{0}|^{2a_{0}}\ldots|z_{p}|^{2a_{p}}\prod_{1}^{p}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\log\bar{z}_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{j}\wedge d\bar{z}_{j}.

Notice also that the local equation t=∏0pzibit=\prod_{0}^{p}z_{i}^{b_{i}} has bJ=gcdi∈J⁡bib_{J}=\gcd_{i\in J}b_{i} sheets of solutions. Using the polar coordinates by zi=exi​log⁡|t|+−1​θiz_{i}=e^{x_{i}\log|t|+\sqrt{-1}\theta_{i}} for i∈Ji\in J, ones sees that the magnitude of ∫EJ0−1n2​Ωt∧Ω¯t\int_{E_{J}^{0}}\sqrt{-1}^{n^{2}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t} is O⁡(|log⁡|t||l)O(|\log|t||^{l}) for l=|{j∈J:aj=0}|−1l=|\{j\in J:a_{j}=0\}|-1.

The local logarithmic variables xi=log⁡|zi|log⁡|t|x_{i}=\frac{\log|z_{i}|}{\log|t|} lie on the simplex

ΔJ={∑0pbixi=1,0≤xi≤1}.\Delta_{J}=\{\sum_{0}^{p}b_{i}x_{i}=1,\quad 0\leq x_{i}\leq 1\}.

These depend on the choice of ziz_{i}, but since the local defining equation of divisors differ by a nowhere vanishing holomorphic function, the ambiguity of xix_{i} is only O⁡(1|log⁡|t||)O(\frac{1}{|\log|t||}) for 0<|t|≪10<|t|\ll 1. Taking a more global viewpoint, the combinatorial pattern of how these simplices fit together exactly reflects the intersection pattern of the divisors EiE_{i}. Formally, this information is encoded in the dual intersection complex Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} for the snc model 𝒳\mathcal{X}: this is the polyhedral complex whose vertices viv_{i} correspond to EiE_{i}, and we assign a simplex ΔJ\Delta_{J} with vertices viv_{i} for i∈Ji\in J if and only if EJ≠0E_{J}\neq 0. The coodinates xjx_{j} then define a piecewise integral affine structure on Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. Up to the above O⁡(1|log⁡|t||)O(\frac{1}{|\log|t||}) ambiguity, we now have a logarithm map Log𝒳:Xt→Δ𝒳\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}:X_{t}\to\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}, locally described by xi=log⁡|zi|log⁡|t|x_{i}=\frac{\log|z_{i}|}{\log|t|}. Consequently, the ‘hybrid’ space X⊔Δ𝒳X\sqcup\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} is equipped with a natural topology, so that a sequence of points zk∈Xtz_{k}\in X_{t} converges to x∈Δ𝒳x\in\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} iff t→0t\to 0 and Log𝒳​(zk)→x\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}(z_{k})\to x. The name ‘hybrid’ refers to the mixture of algebraic varieties with simplicial objects, which is better suited for measure theoretic limits, than the algebraic family 𝒳\mathcal{X}.

The measure also singles out a distinguished subcomplex S​k​(𝒳)Sk(\mathcal{X}), called the essential skeleton, consisting of the simplices in Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} whose vertices correspond to EiE_{i} with ai=0a_{i}=0. This is where the limit of the normalised CY measure is supported. The dimension of S​k​(𝒳)Sk(\mathcal{X}) is a measurement of how transcendental the degeneration XX is; it is reflected by the growth order of ∫XtΩt∧Ω¯t\int_{X_{t}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}. The largest possible value for the dimension is nn.

In the case of a large complex structure limit, dimℝS​k​(𝒳)=n\dim_{\mathbb{R}}Sk(\mathcal{X})=n. Let us analyze the CY measure more explicitly, in a semistable snc model. For EJE_{J} corresponding to an nn-dimensional simplex in S​k​(𝒳)Sk(\mathcal{X}), on EJ0E_{J}^{0}

−1n2​Ωt∧Ω¯t=|uJ|2​∏1n−1​d​log⁡zi∧d​log⁡z¯i.\sqrt{-1}^{n^{2}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}=|u_{J}|^{2}\prod_{1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\log\bar{z}_{i}. (7)

Here uJu_{J} limits to its value uJ​(EJ)u_{J}(E_{J}) at the point stratum EJE_{J}, which is called the Poincaré residue of Ω\Omega, and is easily seen to be independent of the choice of coordinates ziz_{i}. It is a consequence of the residue theorem on Riemann surfaces that |uJ​(EJ)|2|u_{J}(E_{J})|^{2} is independent of such JJ [3, Thm. 7.1]. Thus the pushforward to Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} of the normalised CY measure (5) converges smoothly in the interior of ΔJ\Delta_{J} to a constant multiple of the Lebesgue measure:

Log𝒳∗dμt=Log𝒳∗Ωt∧Ω¯t∫XtΩt∧Ω¯t→t→0dμ0:=Const⋅dx1…dxn.\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}*}d\mu_{t}=\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}*}\frac{\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}}{\int_{X_{t}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}}\xrightarrow{t\to 0}d\mu_{0}:=\text{Const}\cdot dx_{1}\ldots dx_{n}. (8)

Notice d​x1​…​d​xndx_{1}\ldots dx_{n} is canonically defined due to the presence of an integral affine structure on ΔJ\Delta_{J}. Viewed as a measure on Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}, the limit d​μ0d\mu_{0} has null measure on the complement of the nn-dimensional faces of S​k​(𝒳)Sk(\mathcal{X}), as the integral of d​μtd\mu_{t} in the corresponding region is O⁡(1|log⁡|t||)O(\frac{1}{|\log|t||}). The constant in (8) is independent of JJ and its sole purpose is to make d​μ0d\mu_{0} a probability measure.

3.2 The effect of blow up

A major caveat is that snc models are highly non-unique, because one can always blow up a given snc model along some locus inside the central fibre. The intrinsic information concerning polarized degenerations, such as the limiting behaviour of metrics and volume measures, are independent of particular snc models.

The effect of blow up on the dual intersection complex and essential skeleton is well understood (cf. [49, A.4]). The intuitive picture is as follows:

  • •

    If we blow up an snc model 𝒳\mathcal{X} along a smooth irreducible subvariety properly contained inside EJ=∩j∈JEjE_{J}=\cap_{j\in J}E_{j}, but not contained in any smaller intersection stratum, then the new dual intersection complex contains Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}, while introducing a new vertex, and some new wings over certain faces of Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. The essential skeleton remains intact.

  • •

    If we blow up an snc model 𝒳\mathcal{X} along some EJ=∩j∈JEjE_{J}=\cap_{j\in J}E_{j}, then the new dual intersection complex is a subdivision of Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. If the simplex ΔJ\Delta_{J} corresponding to EJE_{J} is a face of the essential skeleton S​k​(𝒳)Sk(\mathcal{X}), then there is an induced subdivision on S​k​(𝒳)Sk(\mathcal{X}), and otherwise the essential skeleton remains intact.

While Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} generally becomes larger under blow ups, the essential skeleton S​k​(𝒳)Sk(\mathcal{X}) is only subdivided, and its piecewise affine structure (in particular its homeomorphism type) is a birational invariant, denoted as S​k​(X)Sk(X). The birational invariance is not surprising: the essential skeleton is the measure theoretic limit of XtX_{t}, a property independent of the choice of models.

3.3 Kontsevich-Soibelman conjecture

In an attempt to extract limiting information from the SYZ picture, Kontsevich and Soibelman [48][49] proposed the following picture. Let XtX_{t} be a polarized degeneration of Calabi-Yau manifolds near the large complex structure limit, then

  • •

    (Kähler class normalization) The rescaled metrics ωC​Y,t∈1|log⁡|t||​c1​(𝒪⁡(1))\omega_{CY,t}\in\frac{1}{|\log|t||}c_{1}(\mathcal{O}(1)) have nontrivial finite diameter Gromov Hausdorff subsequential limits.

  • •

    There is an affine structure on the essential skeleton S​k​(X)Sk(X) away from a Hausdorff codimension two singular subset. On the smooth locus, there is a Riemannian metric obtained as the Hessian of local solutions to the real Monge-Ampère equation. This metric agrees with the Gromov-Hausdorff limit, which is conjecturally independent of the subsequence.

  • •

    (Topology) Under the strict Calabi-Yau condition hp,0​(Xt)=0h^{p,0}(X_{t})=0 for p<np<n, the essential skeleton is homeomorphic to SnS^{n}.

The heuristic idea is that the essential skeleton should be the base of the hypothetical SYZ fibration, and the SYZ fibration is approximated by logarithm maps, at least in the generic region. We briefly comment on the status of the Kontsevich-Soibelman conjecture (cf. also [53, section 4.5]):

  • •

    The uniform diameter estimate independent of small tt

    C−1≤diam​(X,ωC​Y,t)≤C,C^{-1}\leq\text{diam}(X,\omega_{CY,t})\leq C,

    is recently established in joint work with Tosatti [56], using primarily Riemannian geometric methods. This together with Gromov compactness proves the Kähler class normalization prediction.

  • •

    The prediction about the existence of a metrically preferred affine structure away from codimension two on the base, is part of the general lore of the SYZ conjecture (cf. section 2.4), even though there is insufficient evidence. Generally speaking, the simplicial complex structure on S​k​(X)Sk(X) induces a piecewise affine structure, and improving it to an affine structure away from codimension two, would require highly nontrivial choices. The author is not aware of a completely satisfactory answer to the following elementary question:

    002M

    Question 5. Given a one-parameter family of quartic K3 surfaces near the large complex structure limit, without special symmetry, how can we determine the location of singular points on S​k​(X)Sk(X)? How can we write down the affine structure on the regular locus explicitly?

  • •

    The topology of the essential skeleton is an active research topic in birational geometry. The homeomorphism between S​k​(X)Sk(X) with SnS^{n} is verified for many examples. In general, it is known [62][63] that S​k​(X)Sk(X) is a ‘pseudomanifold’, its rational homology groups agree with SnS^{n}, and its fundamental group has trivial profinite completion, but the actual homeomorphism type is still elusive, and supposedly requires appealing to the Poincaré conjecture.

002N

Remark 3. Gromov-Hausdorff convergence is a standard way to make sense of weak limits, but alternative weak notions are possible. Kontsevich and Soibelman [49][48] aim to establish non-archimedean geometry as a suitable framework for studying limits of Calabi-Yau manifolds and the consequences for mirror symmetry. Kontsevich and Tscinkel [50] initiated the attempt to build up non-archimedean pluripotential theory by imitating Kähler geometry, a task taken much further by Boucksom et al. [4][3][6][5] (cf. section 5). Kontsevich and Soibelman may have anticipated long before any rigorous definitions, that the Calabi-Yau metrics should converge in some potential theoretic sense to a non-archimedean object, and the limiting information should be read off purely in terms of data on the essential skeleton.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.