ScalingStacks

Proof. [04WK]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

Let 𝒳\mathscr{X} be a proper s​n​csnc-model of XX over RR. By a standard argument based on spreading out and Greenberg Approximation (as explained in [MN13, 5.1.2], for instance) we can find a connected smooth kk-curve π’ž\mathscr{C}, a kk-rational point ss on π’ž\mathscr{C}, a uniformizer tt in π’ͺπ’ž,s\mathcal{O}_{\mathscr{C},s} and a smooth and proper π’ž\mathscr{C}-scheme 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime} with geometrically connected fibers such that there exists an isomorphism

𝒳×RR/(t2)β†’π’³β€²Γ—π’žSpec​π’ͺπ’ž,s/(t2)\mathscr{X}\times_{R}R/(t^{2})\to\mathscr{X}^{\prime}\times_{\mathscr{C}}\mathrm{Spec}\,\mathcal{O}_{\mathscr{C},s}/(t^{2})

over R/(t2)β‰…Oπ’ž,s/(t2)R/(t^{2})\cong{O}_{\mathscr{C},s}/(t^{2}). Inspecting the proof of [MN13, 5.1.2], we see that we can also assume that the relative canonical sheaf of 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime} is trivial over C=π’žβˆ–{s}C=\mathscr{C}\setminus\{s\} (if the generic fiber of a smooth and proper family over an integral scheme has trivial canonical sheaf, then this holds for all fibers over some dense open subscheme of the base).

By (3.1) we know that Sk⁑(𝒳)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}) is a strong deformation retract of XKanX_{K}^{\mathrm{an}}. Thus by Proposition 4.2.3, it suffices to prove assertions (1)–(3) for π’³β€²Γ—π’žSpec​K\mathscr{X}^{\prime}\times_{\mathscr{C}}\mathrm{Spec}\,K instead of XX. In this case, they follow from Corollary 3.3.6 and Theorems 3.2.8, 3.3.4, 4.1.4 and 4.1.7.

It remains to prove (4). Invoking the Lefschetz Principle, we may assume that k=β„‚k=\mathbb{C}. Taking for 𝒳\mathscr{X} a projective s​n​csnc-model over RR, we can arrange that 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime} is projective over π’ž\mathscr{C}. By Proposition 4.2.2 and the theory of logarithmic nearby cycles [Na98, 3.3] the action of Οƒ\sigma on

He´​tn​(XΓ—KKa,β„šβ„“)H^{n}_{\mathrm{\acute{e}t}}(X\times_{K}K^{a},\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})

has a Jordan block of size n+1n+1 if and only if the corresponding statement holds for 𝒳Kβ€²\mathscr{X}^{\prime}_{K}. By Deligne’s comparison theorem for Γ©tale and complex analytic nearby cycles in [SGA7b, Exp.XIV], it is also equivalent to the property that the monodromy action on the degree nn singular cohomology of a general fiber of 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime} has a Jordan block of size n+1n+1. If hi,0​(X)=0h^{i,0}(X)=0 for 0<i<n0<i<n, then we can assume that this also holds for a general fiber of 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime}, by the proof of [MN13, 5.1.2] (if this property is satisfied by the generic fiber of a smooth and proper family over an integral scheme, then it holds for all fibers over a dense open subscheme of the base, by semi-continuity). Thus the assertion (4) follows from Theorem 4.1.10. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.