ScalingStacks

Proof. [04V5]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context ยท Original author HTML

Proof.

A closely related result is proven in [Th07, 3.26]. We will explain how our statement can be deduced from that result. Following the notation in [Th07], we denote by ๐’ณโ„ถ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} the kk-analytic space associated to the toroidal embedding Xโ†ช๐’ณX\hookrightarrow\mathscr{X}, where kk is endowed with the trivial absolute value. By definition, ๐’ณโ„ถ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} is the generic fiber of the formal tt-adic completion ๐’ณ^\widehat{\mathscr{X}} of ๐’ณ\mathscr{X}, viewed as a special formal kk-scheme by forgetting the kโก[[t]]k[\negthinspace[t]\negthinspace]-structure [Be96, ยง1].

The relation between ๐’ณโ„ถ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} and XKanX_{K}^{\mathrm{an}} is explained in detail at the beginning of Section 4 in [Ni11]; let us recall the main idea. Considering the morphism of special formal kk-schemes ๐’ณ^โ†’Spfโ€‹kโ€‹[[t]]\widehat{\mathscr{X}}\to\mathrm{Spf}\,k[\negthinspace[t]\negthinspace] and passing to the generic fibers, we obtain a morphism of kk-analytic spaces from ๐’ณโ„ถ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} to the open unit disc DD over kk. We can identify the underlying topological space of DD with [0,1[[0,1[ by means of the homeomorphism

Dโ†’[0,1[:xโ†ฆ|t(x)|.D\to[0,1[\,:x\mapsto|t(x)|.

The residue field of DD at the point 1/e1/e in [0,1[[0,1[ is KK with our chosen tt-adic absolute value |โ‹…|K|\cdot|_{K}, and the KK-analytic space XKanX_{K}^{\mathrm{an}} is canonically isomorphic to the fiber of ๐’ณโ„ถ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} over 1/e1/e. Thus we can view XKanX_{K}^{\mathrm{an}} as the subspace of ๐’ณโ„ถ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} consisting of the points xx such that |tโก(x)|=1/e|t(x)|=1/e.

In [Th07, 3.13], Thuillier constructs a retraction p๐’ณp_{\mathscr{X}} of ๐’ณโ„ถ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} onto a certain subspace ๐’ฎโก(๐’ณ)\mathcal{S}(\mathscr{X}), the skeleton of the toroidal embedding. Moreover, in [Th07, 3.26], he shows that p๐’ณp_{\mathscr{X}} can be extended to a strong deformation retraction HH of ๐’ณโ„ถ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} onto ๐’ฎโก(๐’ณ)\mathcal{S}(\mathscr{X}). Going through the definitions, one observes that p๐’ณp_{\mathscr{X}} and HH commute with the morphism ๐’ณโ„ถโ†’D\mathscr{X}^{\beth}\to D and that the restriction of

p๐’ณ:๐’ณโ„ถโ†’๐’ฎโก(๐’ณ)p_{\mathscr{X}}:\mathscr{X}^{\beth}\to\mathcal{S}(\mathscr{X})

over the point 1/e1/e of DD is precisely the retraction

ฯ๐’ณ:XKanโ†’Skโก(๐’ณ).\rho_{\mathscr{X}}:X_{K}^{\mathrm{an}}\to\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}).

Thus by restricting HH over 1/eโˆˆD1/e\in D, we obtain a map that satisfies all the properties in the statement. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.