4 Two simple SL fibrations of
We now describe two very elementary examples of (smooth) special
Lagrangian fibrations of , which we will build on later.
The results of this section are not new, and can mostly be found
in Harvey and Lawson [9, §III.3] and the author
[10, §3]. The proofs are easy and will generally be
omitted. Here is our first family of SL 3-folds in .
Theorem 4.1
Let , and define a subset
in by
|
|
|
(8) |
Then is a special Lagrangian -fold in .
If are not both zero, then is a nonsingular
embedded submanifold diffeomorphic to .
Also is the union of the two special Lagrangian
-planes
|
|
|
(9) |
which intersect in the real line .
It is singular as an embedded submanifold, but nonsingular as
an immersed submanifold.
Clearly is invariant under the group acting
on by
|
|
|
(10) |
and using the methods of [11] one can show that any connected
SL 3-fold in invariant under this group is a subset of some
. From the theorem we immediately deduce:
Corollary 4.2
The map defined by
|
|
|
(11) |
is a smooth special Lagrangian fibration of .
This fibration is the local model for the most generic kind of
singularity in smooth SL fibrations of Calabi–Yau 3-folds, as studied
by Gross [5, 6], for instance. Note that the set of singular
fibres in is , of codimension
two, and each singular fibre has a one-dimensional singular
set . Also, the set of all singular
points of singular fibres is , a
complex line in .
Here is our second family of SL 3-folds in , due originally to
Harvey and Lawson [9, §III.3.A].
Theorem 4.3
Let , and define a subset
in by
|
|
|
(12) |
Then is a special Lagrangian -fold in . Moreover
- (i)
has one singular point at .
- (ii)
If then has singular set
.
- (iii)
If then has singular set
.
- (iv)
If then has singular set
.
All other are nonsingular embedded submanifolds
diffeomorphic to .
Again, these 3-folds have a two-dimensional symmetry
group, this time
|
|
|
(13) |
which acts on as a subgroup of by
|
|
|
(14) |
Any connected SL 3-fold in invariant under this group is a
subset of some . The theorem immediately yields
Corollary 4.4
The map defined by
|
|
|
(15) |
is a smooth special Lagrangian fibration of .
This is the local model for another, nongeneric kind of singularity
in smooth SL fibrations of Calabi–Yau 3-folds. The set of singular
fibres in is
|
|
|
which is three half-lines meeting at a point, and is again of
codimension two in . Generic singular fibres have singular
fibre a circle, which is one-dimensional. Note that in a small
neighbourhood of a singular point of a generic singular fibre,
the fibration is a smooth deformation of the fibration of
Corollary 4.2. The set of all singular
points of singular fibres is
|
|
|
a singular complex curve in .
In the rest of the section we explore the structure of the
singular fibres in cases (i)–(iv) of Theorem 4.3,
following [10, §3].
Case (i). Define subsets in by
|
|
|
(16) |
Then are both special Lagrangian cones on , which
intersect only at 0, their common singular point. But . Thus in this case splits into two pieces .
Harvey and Lawson remark [9, p. 97] that are not real
analytic.
Case (ii). Let , write
, and
define maps by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now are smooth, injective maps
, whose first derivatives have full rank at
every point. Therefore the images of are
nonsingular submanifolds of , which are embedded and closed.
So define . An
equivalent definition is
|
|
|
(17) |
Then and are both nonsingular, embedded
3-submanifolds of diffeomorphic to . Comparing
(12) and (17) we see that . Since is an SL 3-fold we deduce that
are also SL 3-folds in , which is easy to verify
directly.
Observe that , which is the singular set of
given in Theorem 4.3. Thus is the union of
two nonsingular special Lagrangian 3-folds and ,
and the singularities of occur at their intersection.
Note that we could consider to be a nonsingular,
immersed submanifold.
Cases (iii) and (iv). We can treat these exactly
like case (ii), but with a cyclic permutation of and
. In particular, if for we define
|
|
|
(18) |
|
|
|
(19) |
then and are all nonsingular SL 3-folds
diffeomorphic to , with and .
It is not difficult to show that is asymptotic to the
-cone at infinity for . Thus the
for are three different families of asymptotically
conical SL 3-folds asymptotic to the same singular cone .
We may interpret them as three different ways to ‘resolve’ the
same SL 3-fold singularity . This point of view was taken
in [10, §3–§5]. Similarly, is asymptotic
to at infinity for .
For , define a holomorphic disc in by
|
|
|
(20) |
Then is the intersection of and .
Therefore is a holomorphic disc with boundary in both of
the nonsingular SL 3-folds . In the same way, there are
holomorphic discs and with boundaries in
and . This will be significant later,
when we discuss holomorphic discs in Calabi–Yau 3-folds with boundary
in special Lagrangian 3-folds.