9.2 Modification of this picture for generic ACY 3-folds [03ML]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
9.2 Modification of this picture for generic ACY 3-folds
We are now ready to say something about what special Lagrangian fibrations of generic almost Calabi–Yau 3-folds might look like. Suppose we start with a smooth Gross–Ruan fibration , either of a nongeneric almost Calabi–Yau 3-fold or of the degenerate large complex structure limit, and make a small perturbation to a generic almost Calabi–Yau 3-fold. What happens to the fibration?
Near a nonsingular fibre of , the fibration should remain nonsingular, and the local geometry unchanged. The interesting question is what happens to the singular fibres of . The following is the author’s best guess, on the assumption that special Lagrangian fibrations are well-behaved in the generic case. We preface it with some remarks on monodromy and coordinates on the moduli space.
Let be an SL fibration with generic fibre . By Theorem 2.9, near a nonsingular fibre the moduli space of deformations of is isomorphic to . But this moduli space is , and so near any point in we have natural affine coordinates modelled on .
However, near a singular fibre the situation is more complicated because of the monodromy action. Let be a nonsingular fibre near . Let be the set of monodromies of loops in based at and staying in a small neighbourhood of . Then is a group acting on and . Roughly speaking, near we can regard as a kind of quotient of by , so that is a kind of orbifold, with the topology of a 3-manifold, but not the smooth structure.
In what follows, as long as we make use of only -invariant objects, we can think of as being locally like and mostly ignore the monodromy action. We shall represent elements of by column vectors, and elements of by row vectors, upon which the monodromy matrices of equations (68)–(70) act by left and right multiplication respectively.
Here is how generic fibrations might work near the perturbation of the Gross–Ruan singular fibres described in parts (a)–(c) of §9.1.
- (a)
The author conjectures that under small deformations, the ‘edges’ in the Gross–Ruan picture will thicken out into thin ‘ribbons’ of the kind described in §8. They are closed subsets of hyperplanes in defined locally by , where is the relative de Rham cohomology class in and a relative homology class in depending on the edge, which we expect to be represented by one or more holomorphic discs for some , as we discussed in §7.3.
The situation described in §8, in which the generic fibre has two singular points, is only the simplest possibility. In general we expect the generic singular fibres to contain an even number of singular points, divided equally into two kinds. In codimension one on the ribbon these singular points can appear or disappear in pairs of different kinds, and the edge of the ribbon is where the last two singular points disappear.
We can give local models for such fibrations by modifying Assumption 8.1, replacing the function in parts (iii) and (iv) by a more general smooth function with period and nondegenerate stationary points, modifying part (v) to refer to the stationary points of , and dropping part (vi) entirely.
- (b)
For positive vertices in the Gross–Ruan picture, the monodromy matrices of (69) all fix the vectors
in and the direction in .
In a generic perturbation of a Gross–Ruan fibration near a positive vertex, the three edges in should thicken out into ‘ribbons’ lying in the three hyperplanes
which are the hyperplanes dual to , and intersect in the line . The ribbons intersect in a bounded subinterval of this line, as sketched in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Discriminant locus near a perturbation of a positive vertex There are two obvious ways for this to happen, in which either is part of the boundary of each , or the ribbons extend a little way beyond their intersection . The author thinks that the latter option is what actually happens, as in Figure 4.
For generic points in the intersection the singularities of the fibres are just finitely many points modelled locally on the -cones of (16). These are divided into three kinds, corresponding to the ribbons , according to the homology class of the in that collapses to a point.
However, at certain special points in there will be a new kind of codimension three singularity, when two or three of these singular points of different kinds come together. The author does not have a local model for this singularity, but topologically it may involve a cone on a genus 2 surface. There must be at least one such singular fibre, as it is necessary for the monodromy to work out.
We expect that when is a nonsingular fibre near the ribbon , there should exist holomorphic discs in whose boundary in has homology class in . Singularities develop when the area of shrinks to zero, which happens on the hyperplane in .
- (c)
For negative vertices, the monodromy matrices of (70) all fix the vector in and the hyperplane in . In a generic perturbation of a Gross–Ruan fibration near a negative vertex, the three edges in should thicken out into ‘ribbons’ which all lie in the same hyperplane in , isomorphic to in . The three ribbons merge together to make a letter shape in , as sketched in Figure 5.
Figure 5: Discriminant locus near a perturbation of a negative vertex We expect that when is a nonsingular fibre near this part of , there should exist an even number of homologous holomorphic discs in whose boundaries in have homology class in . Singularities develop when the area of shrinks to zero, which happens on the hyperplane in .
The author is fairly confident about parts (a) and (c), but rather less happy about part (b). In fact, Ruan’s Lagrangian fibrations by gradient flow look quite like parts (a) and (c) in the relevant regions. Another option in part (b) is that there could be a new kind of codimension two singularity along the line segment .