Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
As in Lemma 4.1, choose a lower triangular matrix such that
|
|
|
(4.18) |
is an -splitting and define the measure as in Lemma 4.1.
Then as in (4.5), .
Since is an -splitting, we have the estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.19) |
By the first estimate above,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.20) |
where in the last step we have used volume monotonicity for the Riemannian measure. On the other hand, by the second
estimate of (4.19),
|
|
|
(4.21) |
Combining these gives the estimate
|
|
|
(4.22) |
To relate these back to the original function , we observe that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.23) |
which immediately gives
|
|
|
(4.24) |
This completes the proof.
∎