ScalingStacks

Proof. [01FT]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Convexity is clear from the definition. To prove stability under maxima, let φ1,φ2∈𝒟⁡(X)\varphi_{1},\varphi_{2}\in\mathcal{D}(X) be θ\theta-psh, pick a common determination 𝒳\mathcal{X} of θ\theta and the φi\varphi_{i}’s and let Di∈Div0⁡(𝒳)𝐐D_{i}\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbf{Q}} be a representative of φi\varphi_{i} for i=1,2i=1,2.

Since the ample cone of N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}(\mathcal{X}/S) is open, we may find ample line bundles 𝒜1,…,𝒜r∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{A}_{1},\dots,\mathcal{A}_{r}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) whose numerical classes α1,…,αr\alpha_{1},\dots,\alpha_{r} form a basis of N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}(\mathcal{X}/S). We may thus find t1,…,tr∈𝐑t_{1},\dots,t_{r}\in\mathbf{R} such that ℒ:=∑jtj​𝒜j\mathcal{L}:=\sum_{j}t_{j}\mathcal{A}_{j} is a representative of θ\theta in Pic⁡(𝒳)𝐑\Pic(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbf{R}}. Let ε1,…,εr>0\varepsilon_{1},\dots,\varepsilon_{r}>0 be (small) positive numbers such that tj+εj∈𝐐t_{j}+\varepsilon_{j}\in\mathbf{Q} for each ii and set ℒε:=∑j(tj+εj)​𝒜j\mathcal{L}_{\varepsilon}:=\sum_{j}(t_{j}+\varepsilon_{j})\mathcal{A}_{j}. Since φ,φ′\varphi,\varphi^{\prime} are θ\theta-psh it follows that ℒε+Di\mathcal{L}_{\varepsilon}+D_{i} is an ample 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-divisor on 𝒳\mathcal{X} for i=1,2i=1,2. We may thus find a positive integer mm such that m​ℒε∈Pic⁡(𝒳)m\mathcal{L}_{\varepsilon}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}), m​Di∈Div0⁡(𝒳)mD_{i}\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}) and both sheaves 𝒪𝒳​(m⁡(ℒε+Di))\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}}\left(m\left(\mathcal{L}_{\varepsilon}+D_{i}\right)\right), i=1,2i=1,2 are generated by their global sections on 𝒳\mathcal{X}. If we introduce the vertical fractional ideal sheaf

𝔞m:=𝒪𝒳​(m​D1)+𝒪𝒳​(m​D2)\mathfrak{a}_{m}:=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}}(mD_{1})+\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}}(mD_{2})

then it follows that 𝒪𝒳​(m​ℒε)⊗𝔞m\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}}(m\mathcal{L}_{\varepsilon})\otimes\mathfrak{a}_{m} is also generated by its global sections. By Lemma 5.6, log⁡|𝔞m|=m​max⁡{φ1,φ2}\log|\mathfrak{a}_{m}|=m\max\left\{\varphi_{1},\varphi_{2}\right\} is thus psh with respect to m⁡(θ+∑jεj​αj)m(\theta+\sum_{j}\varepsilon_{j}\alpha_{j}), that is:

θ+∑jεj​αj+d​dc​max⁡{φ1,φ2}≥0.\theta+\sum_{j}\varepsilon_{j}\alpha_{j}+dd^{c}\max\{\varphi_{1},\varphi_{2}\}\geq 0.

Letting εj→0\varepsilon_{j}\to 0, we conclude as desired that θ+d​dc​max⁡{φ1,φ2}≥0\theta+dd^{c}\max\{\varphi_{1},\varphi_{2}\}\geq 0. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.