ScalingStacks

4.7 L ∞ and stability estimates for CY potentials [00TT]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

4.7 L∞L^{\infty} and stability estimates for CY potentials

We finally impose the Calabi-Yau condition, and consider the CY potential φ=φC​Y,s\varphi=\varphi_{CY,s} normalised to supXsφ=0\sup_{X_{s}}\varphi=0, solving (20):

ωC​Y,sn=(s−1​ωF​S+−1​∂∂¯​φ)n=as​s−n​d​μs.\omega_{CY,s}^{n}=(s^{-1}\omega_{FS}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\varphi)^{n}=a_{s}s^{-n}d\mu_{s}.
Theorem 4.23.

(L∞L^{\infty}-estimate) The Calabi-Yau potential φC​Y,s\varphi_{CY,s} satisfies the uniform L∞L^{\infty}-estimate ‖φC​Y,s‖L∞≤C\left\lVert\varphi_{CY,s}\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}\leq C.

Proof.

We apply Kolodziej’s estimate in Thm 2.7. The Skoda type inequality (2) is verified in Cor. 4.20, hence the L∞L^{\infty} estimate. ∎

We now specialize to the Fermat case. Clearly φ\varphi is invariant under the discrete symmetry of the hypersurface. Recall the regularisation is denoted as ψ=ψC​Y,s\psi=\psi_{CY,s}, coming from the double Legendre transform construction u=uC​Y,su=u_{CY,s} (cf. section 4.5). The local potentials of φC​Y,s\varphi_{CY,s} and ψC​Y,s\psi_{CY,s} are denoted φm=φC​Y,s,m\varphi_{m}=\varphi_{CY,s,m} and ψm=ψC​Y,s,m\psi_{m}=\psi_{CY,s,m} according to the same convention as (19).

Theorem 4.24.

In the Fermat case, there is a uniform stability estimate

φC​Y,s−ψC​Y,s≥−Cs−1/2logs.\varphi_{CY,s}-\psi_{CY,s}\geq-Cs^{-1/2}\log s. (30)
Proof.

We apply Cor. 2.12. The Skoda estimate is verified in Cor. 4.20. The improved Skoda estimate Thm. 4.21 implies an exponential volume decay:

∫φ−ψ≤−tωϕnVol​(Xs)≤C​e−α​t​s,\frac{\int_{\varphi-\psi\leq-t}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(X_{s})}\leq Ce^{-\alpha t\sqrt{s}},

hence there exists c≫1c\gg 1, such that for t0=cs−1/2logst_{0}=cs^{-1/2}\log s,

(∫φ−ψ≤−t0ωϕnVol​(Xs))1/2​n≤Ce−αt0s/2n=Ce−αclogs/2n≤Cs−1/2.\left(\frac{\int_{\varphi-\psi\leq-t_{0}}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(X_{s})}\right)^{1/2n}\leq Ce^{-\alpha t_{0}\sqrt{s}/2n}=Ce^{-\alpha c\log s/2n}\leq Cs^{-1/2}.

Thm 2.7 then implies φ−ψ≥−Cs−1/2logs\varphi-\psi\geq-Cs^{-1/2}\log s as required. ∎

Remark 4.25.

In the theorems above only an upper bound on the volume measure is actually needed. The intuition is that the Skoda inequality is already so close to an L∞L^{\infty} estimate, that a very tiny amount of extra assumptions are needed to conclude L∞L^{\infty}-estimate.

Combining this with the upper bound from Prop. 4.17,

Corollary 4.26.

In the Fermat case, there is a uniform C0C^{0}-stability estimate:

  • •

    Inside Uws,∗⊂XsU^{s,*}_{w}\subset X_{s}, for ⟨m,w⟩=1\langle m,w\rangle=1, the local potentials satisfy |φC​Y,s,m−ψC​Y,s,m|≤Cs−1/2logs,|\varphi_{CY,s,m}-\psi_{CY,s,m}|\leq Cs^{-1/2}\log s, or equivalently |φC​Y,s−ψC​Y,s|≤Cs−1/2logs|\varphi_{CY,s}-\psi_{CY,s}|\leq Cs^{-1/2}\log s.

  • •

    Inside Uws,f​a​c​eU^{s,face}_{w}, the local potentials satisfy |φC​Y,s,0−ψC​Y,s,0|≤Cs−1/2logs|\varphi_{CY,s,0}-\psi_{CY,s,0}|\leq Cs^{-1/2}\log s, or equivalently |φC​Y,s−ψC​Y,s|≤Cs−1/2logs|\varphi_{CY,s}-\psi_{CY,s}|\leq Cs^{-1/2}\log s.

The point is that in the generic region of XsX_{s} the Calabi-Yau local potentials are C0C^{0}-approximated by their regularisations, which build in convexity by construction, and therefore have a priori Lipschitz bounds.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.