ScalingStacks

Proof. [00PV]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

(Thm 2.7) Combining the first two ingredients, the function f⁡(t)=(∫ϕ≤−tωϕnVol​(X))1/2​nf(t)=(\frac{\int_{\phi\leq-t}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(X)})^{1/2n} satisfies

t​f​(t+τ)≤B​f​(τ)2,0≤t≤1,τ≥0,tf(t+\tau)\leq Bf(\tau)^{2},\quad 0\leq t\leq 1,\quad\tau\geq 0,

We conclude that for t>t0+4​B​f​(t0)t>t_{0}+4Bf(t_{0}) the sublevel set {ϕ≤−t}\{\phi\leq-t\} has zero ωϕ\omega_{\phi}-measure, and therefore zero capacity by Lemma 2.8, so ϕ\phi has the lower estimate as claimed in the first statement.

For the second statement, by (2) we have an a priori exponential decay

f(t)≤A1/2​ne−αt/2n,t≥0,f(t)\leq A^{1/2n}e^{-\alpha t/2n},\quad t\geq 0,

which allows us to find an appropriate t0t_{0}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.