3.1. Exponential decay lemma [05CM]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
3.1. Exponential decay lemma
We would like to analyze the behavior of Gibbons-Hawking solutions when the tori (both in the fibers and in the base) are shrinking. First, let us introduce a non-linear differential equation of the Monge-Ampère type.
Definition.
We refer to a pair of real positive definite matrix functions as a solution to the split Monge-Ampère equation in an open subset if and they are locally given by a smooth potential function :
| (17) |
To describe the asymptotics at the discriminant we would like to treat the simplex on the same footing as . Namely, we let be the cone over , and let be its dual cone in . The polyhedral complex provides a polyhedral decomposition of into cells . Denote by the -valued 1-current defined in the same way as .
Definition.
Given a domain in a -type singular solution to the split Monge-Ampère equation in is a pair of matrix functions which are local Monge-Ampère solutions in with asymptotics at the discriminant locus governed by the distributional equation
| (18) |
Conjecture 3.1 (Exponential decay lemma).
Given a convex domain in and a -type solution of the split Monge-Ampère equation in there is a real one-parameter family of -solutions to the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz in such that
- •
The diameter of the circles both in the fiber and in the torus part of the base away from the discriminant is roughly given by .
- •
The zero Fourier modes of the GH solutions as functions of the rescaled variables , where , will converge (in some properly weighted norm on the function space) to as .
- •
The higher Fourier modes decay exponentially away from the discriminant in , uniformly in . That is, if denotes the Euclidean distance from the point to the discriminant, then
for some constants , and large enough and .
We would like to give some easy examples and a rough argument based on those why we believe this conjecture is true. Note, however, that once justified, it will have an important consequence for the metric collapse program for the toric hypersurfaces and complete intersections:
Corollary 3.2.
The metric space , where is the Riemannian (orbifold) metric from the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz, converges in the Gromov-Hausdorff sense to , with the limiting metric .