2. Ricci-flat metrics [05C9]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2. Ricci-flat metrics
2.1. Generalized Gibbons-Hawking ansatz
Suppose , a -dimensional (real) torus, acts freely on an -(complex) dimensional Kähler manifold by Hamiltonian holomorphic isometries. Then can be considered as a principal -bundle over a real manifold of dimension . The generalized Gibbons-Hawking ansatz expresses the Kähler and Ricci-flat conditions as differential equations in the moment map coordinates and holomorphic coordinates on the Kähler quotient.
Let denote the Lie algebra of the torus Lie group , and let be the natural integral lattice in . We will fix a basis in . This defines affine coordinates on the dual space . Let be either or , with the affine complex coordinates , where are the phase coordinates on the torus in the latter case.
Consider a principal -bundle over an open set in , with coordinates . Denote by its integral Chern class as an element in .
Theorem 2.1 (cf. [PP91]).
Let , respectively , be real symmetric, respectively hermitian, positive definite matrices of smooth functions on , locally given by some potential function :
| (1) |
Then the following -valued 2-form is closed:
| (2) |
Suppose, in addition, that and is in the cohomology class . Then there exist a connection on the bundle with associated 1-forms and the curvature such that is a Kähler manifold with Ricci-flat metric given by
| (3) |
where and form a basis of holomorphic 1-forms. The holomorphic -form and the Kähler form:
| (4) |
are compatible in the sense that .
Proof.
First we note that the local potential description of and by (1) insures that
| (5) |
Moreover, if denote the coordinates on the torus fiber such that are the Hamiltonian vector fields, then the connection 1-forms can be written up to exact forms on in terms of the local potential :
| (6) |
And one can see explicitly that .
The integrability of the complex structure follows from the fact that the differential ideal generated by -forms is closed:
| (7) |
where we have only used .
It is equally easy to verify the Kähler condition:
| (8) |
Finally, the Ricci-flatness is manifest since in the complex coordinates . ∎
We are interested in applying the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz to description of the metrics on the toric Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces. Given a torus fibration of such hypersurface near the large complex structure point one may approximate the true Calabi-Yau metric by non-compact solutions of GH equations over different regions of the base. Away from the discriminant locus a semi-flat metric gives a good approximation. We try to argue that as the tori shrink to zero size the metric behavior near singular fibers can also be approximated by certain -periodic solutions of GH ansatz. This local description is the main subject of the paper.
2.2. Example: toric orbifold
This is an important toy example which provides the local description of Gibbons-Hawking solutions for more interesting cases. Here for the standard toric orbifold metric one can actually write down an explicit solution to the Gibbons-Hawking equations.
First we set up the notations. Let be an integral lattice in a real vector space . Denote by the dual lattice in the dual space.
Let be an -simplex with vertices in the lattice , whose affine distance from the origin is 1. That is, there is a vector in the dual lattice such that , all . Denote by the cone over and by the dual cone.
Let be the associated affine toric variety (cf., e.g. [Ful93]). If denotes the (finite index) sublattice in generated by and is the quotient group , then is isomorphic to the orbifold .
The real torus acts on . But we will be interested rather in the action of its subtorus , where . The -dimensional subspace can be naturally identified with the Lie algebra of . The dual quotient space is identified with .
Let denote the open normal cones to the vertices of . Define a polyhedral complex in to be the union of walls separating the ’s:
with the orientation of each wall determined by the ordering of . Another way to look at is as being the image of the union of -dimensional cones in under the quotient map .
The vector lies in the interior of , hence defines a regular function, which vanishes at the divisor in corresponding to the boundary of . Together with the moment map we have the torus fibration
whose restriction to is a principal -bundle .
To describe the topology of this bundle note that the homology group can be naturally identified with , the (finite index) sublattice of generated by the elements for all pairs of . Then the Chern class of this bundle
is the element given by the natural inclusion .
The final piece of notation before we describe the standard orbifold metric on is the (finite index) sublattice generated by ’s. Let be its dual lattice. Let be the minimal vectors in along the rays of .
In polar coordinates the standard orbifold metric on the algebraic torus will be
The functions are defined only on the -fold covering space of , but are well defined on itself. So are the differential forms .
To write this metric in the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz we choose a basis of . Evaluating the moment map on the basis vectors defines the coordinates on , thus giving an identification with . The metric on each phase torus is constant, and, hence, it is given by a quadratic form on . Let be the matrix of restriction of to in the basis . Then the functions and give a solution to the GH equations.
Note that the top degree holomorphic form coincide with the push forward under the projection of the standard volume form on .
As an illustration free of orbifold complications let us write the ansatz for the standard Euclidean metric on explicitly. In this case, is the standard -simplex in , i.e. form a basis in . We will fix the coordinates on . The action of the torus
on gives rise to a principal -bundle over . Then, in the Gibbons-Hawking coordinates the metric on can be written as
where
The above expressions degenerate whenever two or more of the coordinates vanish. Thus, the discriminant locus is given by and . However, when written in the Euclidean coordinates the metric extends from to the standard flat metric on .
2.3. Non-flat orbifold metrics
We start with a -torus bundle which has the same topology as the orbifold bundle above. It is convenient to encode the topological information about the bundle by rewriting the equation (5) for the curvature in a distributional form. Let be the -valued 1-current supported on defined by
| (9) |
for an -form . Then adding the distributional equation
| (10) |
to the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz will automatically guarantee that the fibration has the right Chern class. Here stands for the two-current associated to the origin in (the Dirac delta-function).
A remark on notation: and in (10) really mean the pull back of the corresponding currents to the product . We will continue to abuse this notation throughout the rest of the paper when there is no confusion possible.
Lemma 2.2.
Suppose we have a Gibbons-Hawking solution on , that is, a positive definite matrix function locally given by such that , which satisfy the distributional equation (10) in and, in addition, . Then the total space of the torus bundle can be compactified to the fibration such that is biholomorphic (in the orbifold sense) to in a manner which respects the map
In particular, such solution defines a complete Ricci-flat Kähler metric on the orbifold with the standard holomorphic volume form .
Proof.
The discriminant locus is of codimension 3 in and has a nice simplicial stratification. Using this stratification the topological compactification from to follows by extending the argument of [Gro01, Prop. 2.9] to arbitrary dimensions and including the orbifold singularities. To prove the matching of complex structure we will follow closely [LeB91] where the argument is given for the case.
Let be the Hamiltonian vector fields generating the -action on . Consider the commuting vector fields
| (11) |
where
denote the horizontal lifts of the , and is the complex structure. Since the preserve both the metric and the complex structure, it follows that the are holomorphic vector fields. Moreover, the their flows are complete because
| (12) |
hence, the generate a holomorphic action of on .
The orbit structure of this action is easily seen to be identical with the toric -action on the orbifold . Namely, for each subspace
the set is a union of orbits. For the is a single orbit, where as the decomposes into orbits isomorphic to and a bunch of smaller dimensional orbits according to the polyhedral decomposition of induced by .
Consider the following subsets of :
We can cover the space by open sets . Each map defines a holomorphic principal -bundle over . Since is Stein and contractible we conclude that each is biholomorphic to the product .
Now notice that the bundle structures on agree on their intersection . Thus, is biholomorphic to the quotient space
where the equivalence relation is of the form
| (13) |
for some cocycle with values in the holomorphic maps . But any automorphism of the principal homogeneous space is given by an -tuple of non-zero complex numbers. In other words, each is an -tuple of holomorphic functions . Another choice of trivializations amounts to modifying the cocycle by a coboundary. That is, the biholomorphism type of is determined by the singularities of at .
Next we notice that if any of the had an essential singularity at 0, then it would be possible to find a sequence of points in converging to several distinct points. Hence would not even be Hausdorff. Hence, every singularity has to be removable. But the orders of vanishing of the can be read off from the residues of the 1-forms , and this is a topological information given by the Chern class of the original -bundle. THus, the claimed biholomorphism is established on , and it can be extended to by an orbifold version of the Hartog’s theorem.
In order to show that the holomorphic volume form is necessary the standard one we will prove the following (stronger) statement. Given two sets of commuting vector fields and generating the -actions on which agree topologically, there is a biholomorphism such that . Then, taking to be the standard action on yields the claim about the volume form.
Let together with form a basis of topologically compatible with and . That is, if and are the two sets of coordinates, such that in the respective coordinates and on the big toric orbit , then the transition maps between these coordinates and the standard ones extends from to the whole of without zeros/poles. As a consequence, if we write
then the matrix is invertible and extends to .
The goal is to find a change of coordinates which would induce such a Jacobian matrix. Using the chain rule
this amounts to solving the differential system
| (14) |
which, in general, is overdetermined.
However, in our case there are several restrictions on . Namely, note that the forms
are closed and have to satisfy the periodicity requirements of the action:
where is the generating cycle in the -th factor of in . Then, by writing in the power series form
| (15) |
we conclude that for , except for , and if there exists an with . Hence, one can simultaneously solve the equations
for all , and write down the power series solution to (14):
that converges on the same polydisk in as the power series (15) for does. These functions provide the desired coordinate change. ∎
It is an interesting problem to exhibit the existence (and abundance) of the Gibbons-Hawking solutions. For instance, one can try to deform the standard (flat) orbifold metric. Applying continuity method techniques (cf. [GT83, Ch. 17]) this amounts to inverting a second order linear elliptic differential operator – the linearization of the GH operator at the flat solution. The difficulty is that one of the eigenvalues of its symbol blows off as we approach the discriminant.
In two dimensions (the original GH ansatz [Haw77],[GH78]) the equation becomes the usual Laplace equation. Since there are no positive harmonic functions on except constants, any solution has the form
where is the length of , and is a positive constant. This defines the famous Taub-NUT metric – the first example of a non-trivial complete Kähler Ricci-flat metric on and its quotients by cyclic groups.
2.4. Periodic solutions
The goal here is to set up the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz in such a way that the resulting complex manifold is identifiable with the local model for a Calabi-Yau toric hypersurface. There are no explicit solutions known in dimension higher than 2, unlike the orbifold case. But we will try to make use of the ansatz to get some information about the limiting behavior of solutions in certain degenerations.
We will adapt the notations from the orbifold example. Namely, is a simplex (but now not necessarily of codimension 1) in the lattice , which has the distance 1 from the origin. Let be a simplex in such that . In particular, it means that also has distance 1 from the origin. Let and be the sublattices orthogonal to and , respectively. And let
be the corresponding (dual) quotients. The polyhedral complex provides a polyhedral decomposition of into cells and is the associated 1-current supported on , as before. Also, we define the cone in , its dual and let
be the associated affine toric variety.
Every vertex lies in the interior of , and, hence the monomials belong to the coordinate ring of . Let denote the closure of the affine hypersurface
in the toric variety .
The real torus acts on and leaves the hypersurface invariant. We assume that this action is a holomorphic isometry and denote by the corresponding moment map.
The natural inclusion gives the projection onto the algebraic torus . A choice of , such that , defines the polynomial
which can be thought of as a polynomial in . The zero divisor of does not depend on the choice of and let denote the 2-current in associated to it.
We will consider the map as a torus fibration with the discriminant locus . When restricted to a domain it defines a torus fibration which is a principal -bundle over . The Chern class is given, as before, by the inclusion .
If the torus action is a holomorphic isometry a Ricci-flat metric on can be written in the Gibbons-Hawking form. Our main goal of this section is to prove the converse. That is if we have a GH solution with the right Chern class then it defines a Ricci-flat metric on .
To write everything in coordinates we choose a basis in and a basis in . This will defines the coordinates on and on .
Definition.
Given a domain in a -type solution to the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz in are two positive definite matrix functions – a real and a hermitian – on locally given by a potential:
such that and the distributional equation
| (16) |
is satisfied in .
The topological information about the bundle is again encoded in right hand side of the equation (16).
To state the compatibility with the desired holomorphic volume form we recall (cf., e.g., [Bat93]) that given an affine hypersurface there is a distinguished top degree holomorphic form on , which is defined as a Poincaré residue of the meromorphic -form
on with a single pole along . This form is special in the following sense. If the hypersurface is compactified to a Calabi-Yau hypersurface in a projective toric variety, then is the restriction of the unique (up to a scalar multiple) non-vanishing holomorphic volume form on the Calabi-Yau manifold (orbifold).
Proposition 2.3.
Given a -type Gibbons-Hawking solution on a domain , the total space of the torus bundle can be compactified to the fibration such that is biholomorphic (in the orbifold sense) to in a manner which respects the fibration
In particular, such a solution defines a Ricci-flat Kähler (orbifold) metric on with the holomorphic volume form .
Proof.
The topological compactification again can be drawn from [Gro01, Prop. 2.9]. All we need to show is that a GH solution with asymptotics determined by (16) produces the right complex structure on , which would then uniquely extend to by the orbifold version of Hartog’s theorem. But this is a purely local question and it follows directly from Lemma 2.2 dropping the completeness condition (12) that becomes irrelevant.
To see matching of the volume forms let us choose local complex coordinates on such that the local equation for is . In these coordinates the top degree holomorphic form on will be , where is the standard orbifold volume form. Then, is easily seen to coincide with the local expression for the distinguished form on . ∎