ScalingStacks

4. Moduli of Algebraic K3 surfaces [04YJ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

4. Moduli of Algebraic K3 surfaces

4.1. Satake compactification

Let ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} be the moduli space of polarized K3 surfaces of degree 2​d2d possibly with ADE singularities. Its structure is known as follows. Let ΛK3:=E8​(−1)⊕2⊕U⊕3\Lambda_{\rm K3}:=E_{8}(-1)^{\oplus 2}\oplus U^{\oplus 3} be the K3 lattice and fix a primitive vector λ2​d\lambda_{2d} with (λ2​d,λ2​d)=2​d(\lambda_{2d},\lambda_{2d})=2d and Λ2​d:=λ2​d⟂\Lambda_{2d}:=\lambda_{2d}^{\perp}. The complex manifold

Ω(Λ2​d):={[w]∈ℙ(Λ2​d⊗ℂ)∣(w,w)=0,(w,w¯)>0}.\Omega(\Lambda_{2d}):=\{[w]\in\mathbb{P}(\Lambda_{2d}\otimes\mathbb{C})\mid(w,w)=0,\ (w,\bar{w})>0\}.

has two connected components. We choose one component and denote by 𝒟Λ2​d\mathcal{D}_{\Lambda_{2d}}. Let O⁡(ΛK3)O(\Lambda_{\rm K3}) denote the isomorphism group of the lattice ΛK3\Lambda_{\rm K3} preserving the bilinear form and set

O~(Λ2​d):={g|Λ2​d:g∈O(ΛK3),g(λ2​d)=λ2​d}.\displaystyle\tilde{O}(\Lambda_{2d}):=\{g|_{\Lambda_{2d}}:g\in O(\Lambda_{\rm K3}),\,g(\lambda_{2d})=\lambda_{2d}\}.

The group O~​(Λ2​d)\tilde{O}(\Lambda_{2d}) naturally acts on Ω⁡(Λ2​d)\Omega(\Lambda_{2d}). We define O~+​(Λ2​d)\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d}) to be the index two subgroup of O~​(Λ2​d)\tilde{O}(\Lambda_{2d}) consisting of the elements preserving each connected component of Ω⁡(Λ2​d)\Omega(\Lambda_{2d}). Then it is well-known that

ℱ2​d≃O~+​(Λ2​d)\𝒟Λ2​d≃O~​(Λ2​d)\Ω⁡(Λ2​d).\displaystyle\mathcal{F}_{2d}\simeq\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d})\backslash\mathcal{D}_{\Lambda_{2d}}\simeq\tilde{O}(\Lambda_{2d})\backslash\Omega(\Lambda_{2d}).

Let ℱ2​d¯Sat,τad\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat},\tau_{\rm ad}} (or simply ℱ2​d¯Sat\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}} in our papers) be the Satake compactification of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} corresponding to the adjoint representation of O⁡(2,19)O(2,19). It decomposes as

ℱ2​d¯Sat=ℱ2​d⊔⋃lℱ2​d​(l)⊔⋃pℱ2​d​(p),\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}=\mathcal{F}_{2d}\sqcup\bigcup_{l}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)\sqcup\bigcup_{p}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p),

where ll runs over one-dimensional isotropic subspaces of Λ2​d⊗ℚ\Lambda_{2d}\otimes\mathbb{Q}, and pp runs over two-dimensional isotropic subspaces of Λ2​d⊗ℚ\Lambda_{2d}\otimes\mathbb{Q}. Also, we simply define the tropical geometric compactification of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} as this ℱ2​d¯Sat\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}. The boundary component ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) is given as

ℱ2​d(l)={v∈(l⟂/l)⊗ℝ∣(v,v)>0}/∼.\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)=\{v\in(l^{\perp}/l)\otimes\mathbb{R}\mid(v,v)>0\}/\sim.

Here v∼v′v\sim v^{\prime} if g⋅v=c​v′g\cdot v=cv^{\prime} for some g∈O~+​(Λ2​d)g\in\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d}) and c∈ℝ×c\in\mathbb{R}^{\times}. We have ℱ2​d​(l)=ℱ2​d​(l′)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)=\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l^{\prime}) if g⋅l=l′g\cdot l=l^{\prime} for some g∈O~+​(Λ2​d)g\in\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d}) and ℱ2​d​(l)∩ℱ2​d​(l′)=∅\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)\cap\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l^{\prime})=\emptyset if otherwise. Since (l⟂/l)⊗ℝ(l^{\perp}/l)\otimes\mathbb{R} has signature (1,18)(1,18), there is an isomorphism

{v∈(l⟂/l)⊗ℝ∣(v,v)>0}/ℝ×≃O⁡(1,18)/O⁡(1)×O⁡(18)\{v\in(l^{\perp}/l)\otimes\mathbb{R}\mid(v,v)>0\}/\mathbb{R}^{\times}\\ \simeq O(1,18)/O(1)\times O(18)

and hence ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) is an arithmetic quotient of O⁡(1,18)/O⁡(1)×O⁡(18)O(1,18)/O(1)\times O(18). The other component ℱ2​d​(p)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p) is a point and ℱ2​d​(p)=ℱ2​d​(p′)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p)=\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p^{\prime}) if and only if g⋅p=p′g\cdot p=p^{\prime} for some g∈O~+​(Λ2​d)g\in\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d}). Therefore, if we take representatives of ll and pp from each equivalence class, we get a finite decomposition:

ℱ2​d¯Sat=ℱ2​d⊔⨆lℱ2​d​(l)⊔⨆pℱ2​d​(p).\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}=\mathcal{F}_{2d}\sqcup\bigsqcup_{l}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)\sqcup\bigsqcup_{p}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p).

4.2. Tropical K3 surfaces

In our paper, what we mean by tropical polarized K3 surface is a topological space BB homeomorphic to the sphere S2S^{2}, with an affine structure away from certain finite points Sing⁡(B){\rm Sing}(B), with a metric which is Mongé-Ampere metric gg with respect to the affine structure on B∖Sing⁡(B)B\setminus{\rm Sing}(B). Studies of such object as tropical version of K3 surfaces are pioneered in well-known papers of Gross-Wilson [GW00] and Kontsevich-Soibelman [KS04].

Here we assign such tropical K3 surface to each point in the boundary component ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) as follows. Let ll be an oriented one-dimensional isotropic subspace of Λ2​d⊗ℚ\Lambda_{2d}\otimes\mathbb{Q}. Write ee for the primitive element of ll such that ℝ>0​e\mathbb{R}_{>0}e agrees with the orientation of ll. Take a vector v∈(l⟂/l)⊗ℝv\in(l^{\perp}/l)\otimes\mathbb{R} such that (v,v)>0(v,v)>0. Write [e,v][e,v] for the corresponding point in ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l). Then there exists a (not necessarily projective) K3 surface XX and a marking αX:H2​(X,ℤ)→Λ\alpha_{X}\colon H^{2}(X,\mathbb{Z})\to\Lambda with

  • •

    αX​(H2,0)⊂ℝ​λ+−1​ℝ​v\alpha_{X}(H^{2,0})\subset\mathbb{R}\lambda+\sqrt{-1}\mathbb{R}v,

  • •

    αX−1​(e)\alpha_{X}^{-1}(e) is in the closure of Kähler cone.

The pair (X,αX)(X,\alpha_{X}) is unique up to isomorphisms.

Let LL be a line bundle on XX such that αX​([L])=e\alpha_{X}([L])=e. Then we get an elliptic fibration f:X→B(≃ℙ1)f:X\to B(\simeq\mathbb{P}^{1}). Take a holomorphic volume form Ω\Omega on XX such that αX​([ReΩ])=λ\alpha_{X}([\mathop{\mathrm{Re}}\nolimits\Omega])=\lambda. The map ff is a Lagrangian fibration with respect to the symplectic form ReΩ\mathop{\mathrm{Re}}\nolimits\Omega. Hence it gives an affine manifold structure on B∖ΔB\setminus\Delta, where Δ\Delta denotes the finite set of singular points. Similarly, the imaginary part ImΩ\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\nolimits\Omega gives another affine manifold structure on B∖ΔB\setminus\Delta.

We endow the base space BB with the McLean metric on the base BB ([ML98]), where we regard ff as special Lagrangian fibration after hyperKähler rotation. A straightforward calculation shows that this coincides with the “special Kähler metric” g𝑠𝑝g_{\it sp} introduced and studied in [DW96, Hit96, Freed99] and appears as the metric on ℙ1\mathbb{P}^{1} in [GTZ16]. We rescale the metric to make its diameter 11 and denote this obtained tropical K3 surface by Φalg​([e,v])\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]).

Remark 4.1.

Recall the concepts of the class of metric (metric class) and the radiance obstruction of Mongé-Ampére manifolds BB with singularities. They are introduced in [KS04] and discussed in [GS06] in more details. We denote them by k⁡(B)∈H1​(B,i∗​Λ~∨⊗ℝ)k(B)\in H^{1}(B,i_{*}\tilde{\Lambda}^{\vee}\otimes\mathbb{R}) and c⁡(B)∈H1​(B,i∗​Λ)c(B)\in H^{1}(B,i_{*}\Lambda), respectively. Here, Λ\Lambda is the affine structure as a ℤ𝑑𝑖𝑚⁡(B)\mathbb{Z}^{\it dim(B)}-local system in tangent bundle T⁡(B∖Δ)T(B\setminus\Delta), −∨-^{\vee} denotes −-’s dual local system, Λ~∨\tilde{\Lambda}^{\vee} is local system of affine functions. In particular, we naturally have a morphism of local systems f:Λ~∨→Λ∨f\colon\tilde{\Lambda}^{\vee}\to\Lambda^{\vee} which induces f∗:H1​(B,i∗​Λ~∨)→H1​(B,i∗​Λ∨)f_{*}\colon H^{1}(B,i_{*}\tilde{\Lambda}^{\vee})\to H^{1}(B,i_{*}\Lambda^{\vee}). It is also easy to see that, if we slightly change the definition of the metric class, to extract its “linear” part as f∗​k​(B)f_{*}k(B). Then, it naturally recovers the data v¯∈(e⟂⊗ℝ/ℝ​e)\overline{v}\in(e^{\perp}\otimes\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{R}e) i.e., we have f∗​k​(Φalg​([e,v]))=[v],f_{*}k(\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]))=[v], under the natural identification H1​(Φalg​([e,v]),i∗​Λ∨⊗ℝ)↪(e⟂⊗ℝ/ℝ​e)H^{1}(\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]),i_{*}\Lambda^{\vee}\otimes\mathbb{R})\hookrightarrow(e^{\perp}\otimes\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{R}e) which comes from the Leray spectral sequence applied to the elliptic fibration X↠Φalg​([e,v])X\twoheadrightarrow\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]) in §4.2. Our results in [Od16] and Theorem 3.1 for AgA_{g} can be re-interpretted similarly (but with weight 11).

Remark 4.2.

Yuto Yamamoto [Yam] has some ongoing interesting work which seems to be related to our works, where he constructs a sphere with an integral affine structure from the tropicalization of an anticanonical hypersurface in a toric Fano 3-fold, and computes its radiance obstruction.

4.3. Gromov-Hausdorff collapse of K3 surfaces

For a point in ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} we have a corresponding polarized K3 surface (X,L)(X,L), equipped with a natural Ricci-flat metric. For [e,v]∈ℱ2​d​(l)[e,v]\in\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) we defined in a previous section Φalg​([e,v])\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]). For a point in ℱ2​d​(p)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p) we assign a (one-dimensional) segment, which we denote by Φalg​(ℱ2​d​(p))\Phi_{\rm alg}(\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p)). Let us normalize these metric spaces so that their diameters are one. We thus obtained a map Φalg:ℱ2​d¯Sat→{compact metric spaces with diameter one}\Phi_{\rm alg}\colon\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}\to\{\text{compact metric spaces with diameter one}\}. Here, we associate Gromov-Hausdorff distance to the right hand side (target space) and denote it by 𝐶𝑀𝑒𝑡1{\it CMet}_{1}.

Conjecture 4.3.

The map

Φalg:ℱ2​d¯Sat→𝐶𝑀𝑒𝑡1\Phi_{\rm alg}\colon\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}\to{\it CMet}_{1}

given above is continuous.

We would like to simply set the tropical geometric compactification of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} as ℱ2​d¯T:=ℱ2​d¯Sat\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm T}}:=\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}. Indeed, if Conjecture 4.3 holds, we get a continuous map ℱ2​d¯Sat→ℱ2​d¯GH\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}\to\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm GH} and we also observe that each ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) encodes affine structure of the limit tropical K3 surface as well. (This answers a question of Prof. B. Siebert in 2016 to the first author, regarding if one can associate tropical affine structure to limit of any collapsing sequence). So far, we have partially confirmed the conjecture. The case of (A1A_{1}-singular flat) Kummer surfaces, with 33-dimensional moduli, are easily reduced to [Od16]. More generally, we have proved the following. In particular, the conjecture 4.3 holds at least away from finite points.

Theorem 4.4.

The map Φalg\Phi_{\rm alg} is continuous on ℱ2​d¯Sat∖(⋃pℱ2​d​(p))\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}\setminus(\bigcup_{p}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p)). It is continuous also when restricted to the boundary ∂ℱ2​d¯Sat=ℱ2​d¯Sat∖ℱ2​d\partial{\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}}=\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}\setminus\mathcal{F}_{2d}.

The proof of the former half of the statements involves some symmetric space theory, hyperKähler geometry, algebraic geometry of moduli, and a priori analytic estimates. The estimates heavily depends on [Tos10, GW00, GTZ13, GTZ16, TZ17] and their extensions. One nontrivial part of the extension is, for instance, to make many of the C2C^{2}-estimations in op.cit following methods of [Yau78] locally uniform with respect to a family of elliptic K3 surfaces even along degenerations to orbifolds.

During our work, we learnt that Kenji Hashimoto, Yuichi Nohara, Kazushi Ueda [HNU] also studied the Gromov-Hausdorff collapses along certain 22-dimensional subvariety of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d}, i.e., the moduli of E8⊕2⊕U⁡(⊕⟨−2⟩)E_{8}^{\oplus 2}\oplus U(\oplus\langle-2\rangle)-polarized K3 surfaces. Moereover, a result of Hashimoto and Ueda [HU] implies that the restriction of Φalg\Phi_{\rm alg} to the boundary is a generically two-to-one map. We appreciate their gentle discussion with us.

Theorem 4.4 (resp., Conjecture 4.3) combined with Proposition 2.2 determines the Gromov-Hausdorff limits of Type III (resp., Type II) one parameter family of Ricci-flat algebraic K3 surfaces, which solves a conjecture of Kontsevich-Soibelman [KS04, Conjecture 1], Todorov, and Gross-Wilson (cf., e.g., [Gross12, Conjecture 6.2]) in the K3 surfaces case.

In the next section, we discuss collapsing of general Kähler K3 surfaces, which are not necessarily algebraic.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.