ScalingStacks

2. General Hermitian symmetric domain [04YB]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2. General Hermitian symmetric domain

Let 𝔾\mathbb{G} be a reductive algebraic group over ℚ\mathbb{Q}, G=𝔾⁡(ℝ)G=\mathbb{G}(\mathbb{R}), KK (one of) its maximal compact subgroup, and D:=G/KD:=G/K, which we suppose to have a Hermitian symmetric domain structure. We moreover assume DD is irreducible so that GG is simple as a Lie group. Suppose that Γ\Gamma is an arithmetic subgroup of 𝔾⁡(ℚ)\mathbb{G}(\mathbb{Q}), which acts on DD. Hence we can discuss Hermitian locally symmetric space Γ\D\Gamma\backslash D.

Satake [Sat60a], [Sat60b] constructed compactifications of Riemannian locally symmetric spaces G/KG/K associated to irreducible projective representations τ:G→P​G​L​(ℂ)\tau\colon G\to PGL(\mathbb{C}) satisfying certain conditions. They are stratified as:

Γ\D¯Sat,τ=Γ\D⊔⨆P(Γ∩Q⁡(P))\MP/(K∩MP).\overline{\Gamma\backslash D}^{\rm Sat,\tau}=\Gamma\backslash D\sqcup\bigsqcup_{P}(\Gamma\cap Q(P))\backslash M_{P}/(K\cap M_{P}).

Here, PP runs over all the μ⁡(τ)\mu(\tau)-connected rational parabolic subgroups, P=NP​AP​MPP=N_{P}A_{P}M_{P} denotes the Langlands decomposition, and Q⁡(P)Q(P) is the μ⁡(τ)\mu(\tau)-saturation of PP. We are particularly interested in the case when τ\tau is the adjoint representation τad\tau_{\rm ad}.

On the other hand, given any toroidal compactification [AMRT75] for Γ\D\Gamma\backslash D, we can apply the Morgan-Shalen type compactification to it as [Od16, Appendix] (following [MS84, BJo17]). The Morgan-Shalen type compactification Γ\D¯MSBJ\overline{\Gamma\backslash D}^{\rm MSBJ} obtained in this way is independent of the cone decomposition for the toroidal compactification [Od16, A.13, A.14].

We now compare these two compactifications.

Theorem 2.1.

Let Γ\D\Gamma\backslash D be a locally Hermitian symmetric space. Consider its toroidal compactification and the associated (generalised) Morgan-Shalen compactification Γ\D¯MSBJ\overline{\Gamma\backslash D}^{\rm MSBJ}. Then this is homeomorphic to the Satake compactification (Γ\D)¯Sat,τad\overline{(\Gamma\backslash D)}^{\rm Sat,\tau_{\rm ad}} for the adjoint representation τad\tau_{\rm ad} of GG.

In the following we make an “elementary” but important observation on a rationality phenomenon of the limits along one parameter holomorphic family, which we expect to fit well with the recent approach to extend the theta functions in [GS12] etc.

Proposition 2.2.

Suppose U⊂U¯hyb​(𝒳)U\subset\overline{U}^{\rm hyb}(\mathcal{X}) is a Morgan-Shalen-Boucksom-Jonsson compactification associated to an arbitrary dlt stacky pair (𝒳,𝒟)(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{D}) of boundary coefficients 11 ([Od16]) with 𝒰:=𝒳∖𝒟\mathcal{U}:=\mathcal{X}\setminus\mathcal{D}, its coarse moduli space 𝒰→U\mathcal{U}\to U. Then for any holomorphic morphism Δ∗:={z∈ℂ∣0<|z|<1}→𝒰\Delta^{*}:=\{z\in\mathbb{C}\mid 0<|z|<1\}\to\mathcal{U} which extend to Δ:={z∈ℂ∣|z|<1}→𝒳\Delta:=\{z\in\mathbb{C}\mid|z|<1\}\to\mathcal{X}, it induces a continuous map Δ→U¯hyb​(𝒳)\Delta\to\overline{U}^{\rm hyb}(\mathcal{X}), i.e., the limit exists. Furthermore, such possible limits in Δ⁡(𝒟)\Delta(\mathcal{D}) are characterized as points with rational coordinates.

Corollary 2.3 (corollary to Theorem 2.1 and Proposition 2.2).

Take an arbitrary holomorphic map f:Δ∗→Γ\Df\colon\Delta^{*}\to\Gamma\backslash D, which extends to a map to a toroidal compactification of Γ\D\Gamma\backslash D. Then ff also extends to a map Δ→Γ\D¯Sat,τad\Delta\to\overline{\Gamma\backslash D}^{\rm Sat,\tau_{ad}} where 00 is sent to a point with rational coordinates, i.e., a point in the dense subset (C⁡(F)∩U⁡(F)⊗ℚ)/ℚ>0⊂C⁡(F)/ℝ>0(C(F)\cap U(F)\otimes\mathbb{Q})/\mathbb{Q}_{>0}\subset C(F)/\mathbb{R}_{>0}.

This is partially proved in the case of AgA_{g} in [Od16] by using degeneration data in [FC90].

Remark 2.4.

Although we assume that GG is simple in this section, our Morgan-Shalen type compactification construction [Od16, Appendix] still works for non-simple GG. Thus, our construction also gives a new Satake-type compactification for non-simple GG, e.g., of the Hilbert modular varieties.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.