ScalingStacks

4.3. Gromov-Hausdorff collapse of K3 surfaces [04YP]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

4.3. Gromov-Hausdorff collapse of K3 surfaces

For a point in ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} we have a corresponding polarized K3 surface (X,L)(X,L), equipped with a natural Ricci-flat metric. For [e,v]∈ℱ2​d​(l)[e,v]\in\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) we defined in a previous section Φalg​([e,v])\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]). For a point in ℱ2​d​(p)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p) we assign a (one-dimensional) segment, which we denote by Φalg​(ℱ2​d​(p))\Phi_{\rm alg}(\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p)). Let us normalize these metric spaces so that their diameters are one. We thus obtained a map Φalg:ℱ2​d¯Sat→{compact metric spaces with diameter one}\Phi_{\rm alg}\colon\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}\to\{\text{compact metric spaces with diameter one}\}. Here, we associate Gromov-Hausdorff distance to the right hand side (target space) and denote it by 𝐶𝑀𝑒𝑡1{\it CMet}_{1}.

Conjecture 4.3.

The map

Φalg:ℱ2​d¯Sat→𝐶𝑀𝑒𝑡1\Phi_{\rm alg}\colon\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}\to{\it CMet}_{1}

given above is continuous.

We would like to simply set the tropical geometric compactification of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} as ℱ2​d¯T:=ℱ2​d¯Sat\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm T}}:=\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}. Indeed, if Conjecture 4.3 holds, we get a continuous map ℱ2​d¯Sat→ℱ2​d¯GH\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}\to\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm GH} and we also observe that each ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) encodes affine structure of the limit tropical K3 surface as well. (This answers a question of Prof. B. Siebert in 2016 to the first author, regarding if one can associate tropical affine structure to limit of any collapsing sequence). So far, we have partially confirmed the conjecture. The case of (A1A_{1}-singular flat) Kummer surfaces, with 33-dimensional moduli, are easily reduced to [Od16]. More generally, we have proved the following. In particular, the conjecture 4.3 holds at least away from finite points.

Theorem 4.4.

The map Φalg\Phi_{\rm alg} is continuous on ℱ2​d¯Sat∖(⋃pℱ2​d​(p))\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}\setminus(\bigcup_{p}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p)). It is continuous also when restricted to the boundary ∂ℱ2​d¯Sat=ℱ2​d¯Sat∖ℱ2​d\partial{\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}}=\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}\setminus\mathcal{F}_{2d}.

The proof of the former half of the statements involves some symmetric space theory, hyperKähler geometry, algebraic geometry of moduli, and a priori analytic estimates. The estimates heavily depends on [Tos10, GW00, GTZ13, GTZ16, TZ17] and their extensions. One nontrivial part of the extension is, for instance, to make many of the C2C^{2}-estimations in op.cit following methods of [Yau78] locally uniform with respect to a family of elliptic K3 surfaces even along degenerations to orbifolds.

During our work, we learnt that Kenji Hashimoto, Yuichi Nohara, Kazushi Ueda [HNU] also studied the Gromov-Hausdorff collapses along certain 22-dimensional subvariety of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d}, i.e., the moduli of E8⊕2⊕U⁡(⊕⟨−2⟩)E_{8}^{\oplus 2}\oplus U(\oplus\langle-2\rangle)-polarized K3 surfaces. Moereover, a result of Hashimoto and Ueda [HU] implies that the restriction of Φalg\Phi_{\rm alg} to the boundary is a generically two-to-one map. We appreciate their gentle discussion with us.

Theorem 4.4 (resp., Conjecture 4.3) combined with Proposition 2.2 determines the Gromov-Hausdorff limits of Type III (resp., Type II) one parameter family of Ricci-flat algebraic K3 surfaces, which solves a conjecture of Kontsevich-Soibelman [KS04, Conjecture 1], Todorov, and Gross-Wilson (cf., e.g., [Gross12, Conjecture 6.2]) in the K3 surfaces case.

In the next section, we discuss collapsing of general Kähler K3 surfaces, which are not necessarily algebraic.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.