ScalingStacks

Collapsing K3 Surfaces and Moduli Compactification

Odaka, Yuji · Oshima, Yoshiki

Original paper

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Collapsing K3 Surfaces and
Moduli Compactification

Yuji Odaka and Yoshiki Oshima
Abstract.

This note is a summary of our work [OO], which provides an explicit and global moduli-theoretic framework for the collapsing of Ricci-flat Kähler metrics and we use it to study especially the K3 surfaces case. For instance, it allows us to discuss their Gromov-Hausdorff limits along any sequences, which are even not necessarily “maximally degenerating”. Our results also give a proof of Kontsevich-Soibelman [KS04, Conjecture 1] (cf., [GW00, Conjecture 6.2]) in the case of K3 surfaces as a byproduct.

[04Y9]

1. Introduction

Our paper [OO] is a sequel to a series by the first author [Od14, Od16], which compactified both the moduli space of compact Riemann surfaces Mg​(g≥2)M_{g}(g\geq 2) and that of principally polarized abelian varieties AgA_{g}. In each case, as we actually expect an analogue for any moduli of general polarized Kähler-Einstein varieties with non-positive scalar curvatures, we introduce and study two similar (non-variety) compactifications of the moduli space ℳ\mathcal{M}, which we denote by ℳ¯GH\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\rm GH} and ℳ¯T\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\rm T}. The former ℳ¯GH\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\rm GH} is the Gromov-Hausdorff compactification with respect to rescaled Kähler-Einstein metrics of fixed diameters and the latter “tropical geometric compactification” ℳ¯T\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\rm T} should dominate the former ℳ¯GH\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\rm GH} as its boundary ∂ℳ¯T\partial\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\rm T} encodes more structure of the Gromov-Hausdorff limits (collapses) rather than just distance structure. For a precise definition of ℳ¯GH\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\rm GH} we employ the same definition as [Od14, §2.3], [Od16, §2.2].11 1 However, its compactness is unknown at least to the authors in higher dimensional negative scalar curvature case. For ℳ¯T\overline{\mathcal{M}}^{\rm T}, we have a case by case definition for only particular classes of varieties. Here, we recall the structure theorem of Ag¯GH\overline{A_{g}}^{\rm GH} from [Od16, Theorems 2.1 2.3 and Corollary 2.5].

[04YA]
Theorem 1.1 ([Od16]).

AgA_{g} can be explicitly compactified as Ag¯GH\overline{A_{g}}^{\rm GH} whose boundary parametrizes all flat (real) tori ℝi/ℤi\mathbb{R}^{i}/\mathbb{Z}^{i} of diameter 11 where 1≤i≤g1\leq i\leq g. Once we attach the rescaled flat Kähler metric in the principal polarization with diameter 11 to each abelian variety, the parametrization of metric spaces on whole Ag¯GH\overline{A_{g}}^{\rm GH} is continuous with respect to the Gromov-Hausdorff distance.

In the above case, we simply set Ag¯T:=Ag¯GH\overline{A_{g}}^{\rm T}:=\overline{A_{g}}^{\rm GH}. On the other hand, in the analogue for MgM_{g} [Od14], we distinguish Mg¯GH\overline{M_{g}}^{\rm GH} and Mg¯T\overline{M_{g}}^{\rm T}, where the boundaries of Mg¯GH\overline{M_{g}}^{\rm GH} (resp., Mg¯T\overline{M_{g}}^{\rm T}) parametrize metrized graphs (resp., metrized graphs with integer weights on the vertices). We refer the details to [Od14].

Our [OO] contains the followings.

  1. (i\mathrm{i})

    We first apply the Morgan-Shalen type compactification for general Hermitian locally symmetric spaces and identify it with one of the Satake compactifications ([Sat60a], [Sat60b]).

  2. (ii\mathrm{ii})

    We partially prove that the boundary of the Satake compactification of the type which appears in ( i ) parametrizes collapses of abelian varieties and Ricci-flat K3 surfaces. This gives a generalisation of some results in [GW00], [Tos10], [GTZ13], [GTZ16], [TZ17] for the K3 surface case. For instance, a proof of the conjecture of Kontsevich-Soibelman [KS04, Conjecture 1] (see also Gross-Wilson [GW00, Conjecture 6.2]), which is related to the Strominger-Yau-Zaslow mirror symmetry [SYZ96], for the case of K3 surfaces directly follows from our description of collapsing. We also give a conjecture for higher dimensional hyperKähler varieties.

Now we move on to a more detailed description.

[04YB]

2. General Hermitian symmetric domain

Let 𝔾\mathbb{G} be a reductive algebraic group over ℚ\mathbb{Q}, G=𝔾⁡(ℝ)G=\mathbb{G}(\mathbb{R}), KK (one of) its maximal compact subgroup, and D:=G/KD:=G/K, which we suppose to have a Hermitian symmetric domain structure. We moreover assume DD is irreducible so that GG is simple as a Lie group. Suppose that Γ\Gamma is an arithmetic subgroup of 𝔾⁡(ℚ)\mathbb{G}(\mathbb{Q}), which acts on DD. Hence we can discuss Hermitian locally symmetric space Γ\D\Gamma\backslash D.

Satake [Sat60a], [Sat60b] constructed compactifications of Riemannian locally symmetric spaces G/KG/K associated to irreducible projective representations τ:G→P​G​L​(ℂ)\tau\colon G\to PGL(\mathbb{C}) satisfying certain conditions. They are stratified as:

Γ\D¯Sat,τ=Γ\D⊔⨆P(Γ∩Q⁡(P))\MP/(K∩MP).\overline{\Gamma\backslash D}^{\rm Sat,\tau}=\Gamma\backslash D\sqcup\bigsqcup_{P}(\Gamma\cap Q(P))\backslash M_{P}/(K\cap M_{P}).

Here, PP runs over all the μ⁡(τ)\mu(\tau)-connected rational parabolic subgroups, P=NP​AP​MPP=N_{P}A_{P}M_{P} denotes the Langlands decomposition, and Q⁡(P)Q(P) is the μ⁡(τ)\mu(\tau)-saturation of PP. We are particularly interested in the case when τ\tau is the adjoint representation τad\tau_{\rm ad}.

On the other hand, given any toroidal compactification [AMRT75] for Γ\D\Gamma\backslash D, we can apply the Morgan-Shalen type compactification to it as [Od16, Appendix] (following [MS84, BJo17]). The Morgan-Shalen type compactification Γ\D¯MSBJ\overline{\Gamma\backslash D}^{\rm MSBJ} obtained in this way is independent of the cone decomposition for the toroidal compactification [Od16, A.13, A.14].

We now compare these two compactifications.

[04YC]
Theorem 2.1.

Let Γ\D\Gamma\backslash D be a locally Hermitian symmetric space. Consider its toroidal compactification and the associated (generalised) Morgan-Shalen compactification Γ\D¯MSBJ\overline{\Gamma\backslash D}^{\rm MSBJ}. Then this is homeomorphic to the Satake compactification (Γ\D)¯Sat,τad\overline{(\Gamma\backslash D)}^{\rm Sat,\tau_{\rm ad}} for the adjoint representation τad\tau_{\rm ad} of GG.

In the following we make an “elementary” but important observation on a rationality phenomenon of the limits along one parameter holomorphic family, which we expect to fit well with the recent approach to extend the theta functions in [GS12] etc.

[04YD]
Proposition 2.2.

Suppose U⊂U¯hyb​(𝒳)U\subset\overline{U}^{\rm hyb}(\mathcal{X}) is a Morgan-Shalen-Boucksom-Jonsson compactification associated to an arbitrary dlt stacky pair (𝒳,𝒟)(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{D}) of boundary coefficients 11 ([Od16]) with 𝒰:=𝒳∖𝒟\mathcal{U}:=\mathcal{X}\setminus\mathcal{D}, its coarse moduli space 𝒰→U\mathcal{U}\to U. Then for any holomorphic morphism Δ∗:={z∈ℂ∣0<|z|<1}→𝒰\Delta^{*}:=\{z\in\mathbb{C}\mid 0<|z|<1\}\to\mathcal{U} which extend to Δ:={z∈ℂ∣|z|<1}→𝒳\Delta:=\{z\in\mathbb{C}\mid|z|<1\}\to\mathcal{X}, it induces a continuous map Δ→U¯hyb​(𝒳)\Delta\to\overline{U}^{\rm hyb}(\mathcal{X}), i.e., the limit exists. Furthermore, such possible limits in Δ⁡(𝒟)\Delta(\mathcal{D}) are characterized as points with rational coordinates.

[04YE]
Corollary 2.3 (corollary to Theorem 2.1 and Proposition 2.2).

Take an arbitrary holomorphic map f:Δ∗→Γ\Df\colon\Delta^{*}\to\Gamma\backslash D, which extends to a map to a toroidal compactification of Γ\D\Gamma\backslash D. Then ff also extends to a map Δ→Γ\D¯Sat,τad\Delta\to\overline{\Gamma\backslash D}^{\rm Sat,\tau_{ad}} where 00 is sent to a point with rational coordinates, i.e., a point in the dense subset (C⁡(F)∩U⁡(F)⊗ℚ)/ℚ>0⊂C⁡(F)/ℝ>0(C(F)\cap U(F)\otimes\mathbb{Q})/\mathbb{Q}_{>0}\subset C(F)/\mathbb{R}_{>0}.

This is partially proved in the case of AgA_{g} in [Od16] by using degeneration data in [FC90].

[04YF]
Remark 2.4.

Although we assume that GG is simple in this section, our Morgan-Shalen type compactification construction [Od16, Appendix] still works for non-simple GG. Thus, our construction also gives a new Satake-type compactification for non-simple GG, e.g., of the Hilbert modular varieties.

[04YG]

3. Abelian varieties case

We identify our tropical geometric compactification Ag¯T\overline{A_{g}}^{\rm T} ([Od16]) of AgA_{g} with the adjoint type Satake compactification.

[04YH]
Theorem 3.1.

There are canonical homeomorphisms between the three compactifications

Ag¯T≅Ag¯Sat,τad≅Ag¯MSBJ,\overline{A_{g}}^{\rm T}\cong\overline{A_{g}}^{\rm Sat,\tau_{\rm ad}}\cong\overline{A_{g}}^{\rm MSBJ},

extending the identity on AgA_{g}.

The second canonical homeomorphism is a special case of Theorem 2.1 and the first is essentially reduced to matrix computations.

In [OO], we also give a purely moduli-theoritic reexplanation of the structure theory of one parameter degenerations of abelian varieties in [Mum72], [FC90], after the above Theorem 3.1 as follows.

[04YI]
Theorem 3.2.

Take a holomorphic maximally degenerating family of principally polarized abelian varieties π:(𝒳,ℒ)→Δ\pi\colon(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L})\to\Delta. Consider the rescaled Gromov-Hausdorff limit B⁡(𝒳,ℒ)B(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}) of diameter 11 as in Theorem 1.1 ([Od16]) and its discrete Legendre transform Bˇ​(𝒳,ℒ)\check{B}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}) ([GS11], [KS04]).

Then we can enhance the underlying integral affine structure of Bˇ​(𝒳,ℒ)\check{B}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}) as KK-affine structure (in the sense of [KS04, §7.1]) naturally via the data of π\pi. Furthermore, such KK-affine structure recovers π\pi up to an equivalence relation generated by base change (replace tt by tat^{a} with a∈ℚ>0a\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}).

[04YJ]

4. Moduli of Algebraic K3 surfaces

[04YK]

4.1. Satake compactification

Let ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} be the moduli space of polarized K3 surfaces of degree 2​d2d possibly with ADE singularities. Its structure is known as follows. Let ΛK3:=E8​(−1)⊕2⊕U⊕3\Lambda_{\rm K3}:=E_{8}(-1)^{\oplus 2}\oplus U^{\oplus 3} be the K3 lattice and fix a primitive vector λ2​d\lambda_{2d} with (λ2​d,λ2​d)=2​d(\lambda_{2d},\lambda_{2d})=2d and Λ2​d:=λ2​d⟂\Lambda_{2d}:=\lambda_{2d}^{\perp}. The complex manifold

Ω(Λ2​d):={[w]∈ℙ(Λ2​d⊗ℂ)∣(w,w)=0,(w,w¯)>0}.\Omega(\Lambda_{2d}):=\{[w]\in\mathbb{P}(\Lambda_{2d}\otimes\mathbb{C})\mid(w,w)=0,\ (w,\bar{w})>0\}.

has two connected components. We choose one component and denote by 𝒟Λ2​d\mathcal{D}_{\Lambda_{2d}}. Let O⁡(ΛK3)O(\Lambda_{\rm K3}) denote the isomorphism group of the lattice ΛK3\Lambda_{\rm K3} preserving the bilinear form and set

O~(Λ2​d):={g|Λ2​d:g∈O(ΛK3),g(λ2​d)=λ2​d}.\displaystyle\tilde{O}(\Lambda_{2d}):=\{g|_{\Lambda_{2d}}:g\in O(\Lambda_{\rm K3}),\,g(\lambda_{2d})=\lambda_{2d}\}.

The group O~​(Λ2​d)\tilde{O}(\Lambda_{2d}) naturally acts on Ω⁡(Λ2​d)\Omega(\Lambda_{2d}). We define O~+​(Λ2​d)\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d}) to be the index two subgroup of O~​(Λ2​d)\tilde{O}(\Lambda_{2d}) consisting of the elements preserving each connected component of Ω⁡(Λ2​d)\Omega(\Lambda_{2d}). Then it is well-known that

ℱ2​d≃O~+​(Λ2​d)\𝒟Λ2​d≃O~​(Λ2​d)\Ω⁡(Λ2​d).\displaystyle\mathcal{F}_{2d}\simeq\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d})\backslash\mathcal{D}_{\Lambda_{2d}}\simeq\tilde{O}(\Lambda_{2d})\backslash\Omega(\Lambda_{2d}).

Let ℱ2​d¯Sat,τad\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat},\tau_{\rm ad}} (or simply ℱ2​d¯Sat\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}} in our papers) be the Satake compactification of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} corresponding to the adjoint representation of O⁡(2,19)O(2,19). It decomposes as

ℱ2​d¯Sat=ℱ2​d⊔⋃lℱ2​d​(l)⊔⋃pℱ2​d​(p),\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}=\mathcal{F}_{2d}\sqcup\bigcup_{l}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)\sqcup\bigcup_{p}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p),

where ll runs over one-dimensional isotropic subspaces of Λ2​d⊗ℚ\Lambda_{2d}\otimes\mathbb{Q}, and pp runs over two-dimensional isotropic subspaces of Λ2​d⊗ℚ\Lambda_{2d}\otimes\mathbb{Q}. Also, we simply define the tropical geometric compactification of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} as this ℱ2​d¯Sat\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}. The boundary component ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) is given as

ℱ2​d(l)={v∈(l⟂/l)⊗ℝ∣(v,v)>0}/∼.\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)=\{v\in(l^{\perp}/l)\otimes\mathbb{R}\mid(v,v)>0\}/\sim.

Here v∼v′v\sim v^{\prime} if g⋅v=c​v′g\cdot v=cv^{\prime} for some g∈O~+​(Λ2​d)g\in\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d}) and c∈ℝ×c\in\mathbb{R}^{\times}. We have ℱ2​d​(l)=ℱ2​d​(l′)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)=\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l^{\prime}) if g⋅l=l′g\cdot l=l^{\prime} for some g∈O~+​(Λ2​d)g\in\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d}) and ℱ2​d​(l)∩ℱ2​d​(l′)=∅\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)\cap\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l^{\prime})=\emptyset if otherwise. Since (l⟂/l)⊗ℝ(l^{\perp}/l)\otimes\mathbb{R} has signature (1,18)(1,18), there is an isomorphism

{v∈(l⟂/l)⊗ℝ∣(v,v)>0}/ℝ×≃O⁡(1,18)/O⁡(1)×O⁡(18)\{v\in(l^{\perp}/l)\otimes\mathbb{R}\mid(v,v)>0\}/\mathbb{R}^{\times}\\ \simeq O(1,18)/O(1)\times O(18)

and hence ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) is an arithmetic quotient of O⁡(1,18)/O⁡(1)×O⁡(18)O(1,18)/O(1)\times O(18). The other component ℱ2​d​(p)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p) is a point and ℱ2​d​(p)=ℱ2​d​(p′)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p)=\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p^{\prime}) if and only if g⋅p=p′g\cdot p=p^{\prime} for some g∈O~+​(Λ2​d)g\in\tilde{O}^{+}(\Lambda_{2d}). Therefore, if we take representatives of ll and pp from each equivalence class, we get a finite decomposition:

ℱ2​d¯Sat=ℱ2​d⊔⨆lℱ2​d​(l)⊔⨆pℱ2​d​(p).\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}=\mathcal{F}_{2d}\sqcup\bigsqcup_{l}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l)\sqcup\bigsqcup_{p}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p).
[04YL]

4.2. Tropical K3 surfaces

In our paper, what we mean by tropical polarized K3 surface is a topological space BB homeomorphic to the sphere S2S^{2}, with an affine structure away from certain finite points Sing⁡(B){\rm Sing}(B), with a metric which is Mongé-Ampere metric gg with respect to the affine structure on B∖Sing⁡(B)B\setminus{\rm Sing}(B). Studies of such object as tropical version of K3 surfaces are pioneered in well-known papers of Gross-Wilson [GW00] and Kontsevich-Soibelman [KS04].

Here we assign such tropical K3 surface to each point in the boundary component ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) as follows. Let ll be an oriented one-dimensional isotropic subspace of Λ2​d⊗ℚ\Lambda_{2d}\otimes\mathbb{Q}. Write ee for the primitive element of ll such that ℝ>0​e\mathbb{R}_{>0}e agrees with the orientation of ll. Take a vector v∈(l⟂/l)⊗ℝv\in(l^{\perp}/l)\otimes\mathbb{R} such that (v,v)>0(v,v)>0. Write [e,v][e,v] for the corresponding point in ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l). Then there exists a (not necessarily projective) K3 surface XX and a marking αX:H2​(X,ℤ)→Λ\alpha_{X}\colon H^{2}(X,\mathbb{Z})\to\Lambda with

  • •

    αX​(H2,0)⊂ℝ​λ+−1​ℝ​v\alpha_{X}(H^{2,0})\subset\mathbb{R}\lambda+\sqrt{-1}\mathbb{R}v,

  • •

    αX−1​(e)\alpha_{X}^{-1}(e) is in the closure of Kähler cone.

The pair (X,αX)(X,\alpha_{X}) is unique up to isomorphisms.

Let LL be a line bundle on XX such that αX​([L])=e\alpha_{X}([L])=e. Then we get an elliptic fibration f:X→B(≃ℙ1)f:X\to B(\simeq\mathbb{P}^{1}). Take a holomorphic volume form Ω\Omega on XX such that αX​([ReΩ])=λ\alpha_{X}([\mathop{\mathrm{Re}}\nolimits\Omega])=\lambda. The map ff is a Lagrangian fibration with respect to the symplectic form ReΩ\mathop{\mathrm{Re}}\nolimits\Omega. Hence it gives an affine manifold structure on B∖ΔB\setminus\Delta, where Δ\Delta denotes the finite set of singular points. Similarly, the imaginary part ImΩ\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\nolimits\Omega gives another affine manifold structure on B∖ΔB\setminus\Delta.

We endow the base space BB with the McLean metric on the base BB ([ML98]), where we regard ff as special Lagrangian fibration after hyperKähler rotation. A straightforward calculation shows that this coincides with the “special Kähler metric” g𝑠𝑝g_{\it sp} introduced and studied in [DW96, Hit96, Freed99] and appears as the metric on ℙ1\mathbb{P}^{1} in [GTZ16]. We rescale the metric to make its diameter 11 and denote this obtained tropical K3 surface by Φalg​([e,v])\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]).

[04YM]
Remark 4.1.

Recall the concepts of the class of metric (metric class) and the radiance obstruction of Mongé-Ampére manifolds BB with singularities. They are introduced in [KS04] and discussed in [GS06] in more details. We denote them by k⁡(B)∈H1​(B,i∗​Λ~∨⊗ℝ)k(B)\in H^{1}(B,i_{*}\tilde{\Lambda}^{\vee}\otimes\mathbb{R}) and c⁡(B)∈H1​(B,i∗​Λ)c(B)\in H^{1}(B,i_{*}\Lambda), respectively. Here, Λ\Lambda is the affine structure as a ℤ𝑑𝑖𝑚⁡(B)\mathbb{Z}^{\it dim(B)}-local system in tangent bundle T⁡(B∖Δ)T(B\setminus\Delta), −∨-^{\vee} denotes −-’s dual local system, Λ~∨\tilde{\Lambda}^{\vee} is local system of affine functions. In particular, we naturally have a morphism of local systems f:Λ~∨→Λ∨f\colon\tilde{\Lambda}^{\vee}\to\Lambda^{\vee} which induces f∗:H1​(B,i∗​Λ~∨)→H1​(B,i∗​Λ∨)f_{*}\colon H^{1}(B,i_{*}\tilde{\Lambda}^{\vee})\to H^{1}(B,i_{*}\Lambda^{\vee}). It is also easy to see that, if we slightly change the definition of the metric class, to extract its “linear” part as f∗​k​(B)f_{*}k(B). Then, it naturally recovers the data v¯∈(e⟂⊗ℝ/ℝ​e)\overline{v}\in(e^{\perp}\otimes\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{R}e) i.e., we have f∗​k​(Φalg​([e,v]))=[v],f_{*}k(\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]))=[v], under the natural identification H1​(Φalg​([e,v]),i∗​Λ∨⊗ℝ)↪(e⟂⊗ℝ/ℝ​e)H^{1}(\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]),i_{*}\Lambda^{\vee}\otimes\mathbb{R})\hookrightarrow(e^{\perp}\otimes\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{R}e) which comes from the Leray spectral sequence applied to the elliptic fibration X↠Φalg​([e,v])X\twoheadrightarrow\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]) in §4.2. Our results in [Od16] and Theorem 3.1 for AgA_{g} can be re-interpretted similarly (but with weight 11).

[04YN]
Remark 4.2.

Yuto Yamamoto [Yam] has some ongoing interesting work which seems to be related to our works, where he constructs a sphere with an integral affine structure from the tropicalization of an anticanonical hypersurface in a toric Fano 3-fold, and computes its radiance obstruction.

[04YP]

4.3. Gromov-Hausdorff collapse of K3 surfaces

For a point in ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} we have a corresponding polarized K3 surface (X,L)(X,L), equipped with a natural Ricci-flat metric. For [e,v]∈ℱ2​d​(l)[e,v]\in\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) we defined in a previous section Φalg​([e,v])\Phi_{\rm alg}([e,v]). For a point in ℱ2​d​(p)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p) we assign a (one-dimensional) segment, which we denote by Φalg​(ℱ2​d​(p))\Phi_{\rm alg}(\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p)). Let us normalize these metric spaces so that their diameters are one. We thus obtained a map Φalg:ℱ2​d¯Sat→{compact metric spaces with diameter one}\Phi_{\rm alg}\colon\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}\to\{\text{compact metric spaces with diameter one}\}. Here, we associate Gromov-Hausdorff distance to the right hand side (target space) and denote it by 𝐶𝑀𝑒𝑡1{\it CMet}_{1}.

[04YQ]
Conjecture 4.3.

The map

Φalg:ℱ2​d¯Sat→𝐶𝑀𝑒𝑡1\Phi_{\rm alg}\colon\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}\to{\it CMet}_{1}

given above is continuous.

We would like to simply set the tropical geometric compactification of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d} as ℱ2​d¯T:=ℱ2​d¯Sat\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm T}}:=\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}. Indeed, if Conjecture 4.3 holds, we get a continuous map ℱ2​d¯Sat→ℱ2​d¯GH\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{{\rm Sat}}\to\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm GH} and we also observe that each ℱ2​d​(l)\mathcal{F}_{2d}(l) encodes affine structure of the limit tropical K3 surface as well. (This answers a question of Prof. B. Siebert in 2016 to the first author, regarding if one can associate tropical affine structure to limit of any collapsing sequence). So far, we have partially confirmed the conjecture. The case of (A1A_{1}-singular flat) Kummer surfaces, with 33-dimensional moduli, are easily reduced to [Od16]. More generally, we have proved the following. In particular, the conjecture 4.3 holds at least away from finite points.

[04YR]
Theorem 4.4.

The map Φalg\Phi_{\rm alg} is continuous on ℱ2​d¯Sat∖(⋃pℱ2​d​(p))\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}\setminus(\bigcup_{p}\mathcal{F}_{2d}(p)). It is continuous also when restricted to the boundary ∂ℱ2​d¯Sat=ℱ2​d¯Sat∖ℱ2​d\partial{\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}}=\overline{\mathcal{F}_{2d}}^{\rm Sat}\setminus\mathcal{F}_{2d}.

The proof of the former half of the statements involves some symmetric space theory, hyperKähler geometry, algebraic geometry of moduli, and a priori analytic estimates. The estimates heavily depends on [Tos10, GW00, GTZ13, GTZ16, TZ17] and their extensions. One nontrivial part of the extension is, for instance, to make many of the C2C^{2}-estimations in op.cit following methods of [Yau78] locally uniform with respect to a family of elliptic K3 surfaces even along degenerations to orbifolds.

During our work, we learnt that Kenji Hashimoto, Yuichi Nohara, Kazushi Ueda [HNU] also studied the Gromov-Hausdorff collapses along certain 22-dimensional subvariety of ℱ2​d\mathcal{F}_{2d}, i.e., the moduli of E8⊕2⊕U⁡(⊕⟨−2⟩)E_{8}^{\oplus 2}\oplus U(\oplus\langle-2\rangle)-polarized K3 surfaces. Moereover, a result of Hashimoto and Ueda [HU] implies that the restriction of Φalg\Phi_{\rm alg} to the boundary is a generically two-to-one map. We appreciate their gentle discussion with us.

Theorem 4.4 (resp., Conjecture 4.3) combined with Proposition 2.2 determines the Gromov-Hausdorff limits of Type III (resp., Type II) one parameter family of Ricci-flat algebraic K3 surfaces, which solves a conjecture of Kontsevich-Soibelman [KS04, Conjecture 1], Todorov, and Gross-Wilson (cf., e.g., [Gross12, Conjecture 6.2]) in the K3 surfaces case.

In the next section, we discuss collapsing of general Kähler K3 surfaces, which are not necessarily algebraic.

[04YS]

5. Moduli of Kähler K3 surfaces

It is known (cf., [Tod80], [Looi81], [KT87]) that the moduli space of all Einstein metrics on a Kähler K3 surfaces (including orbifold-metrics) has again a structure of the locally Riemannian symmetric space:

O⁡(ΛK3)\S​O0​(3,19)/(S​O​(3)×S​O​(19)),O(\Lambda_{\rm K3})\backslash SO_{0}(3,19)/(SO(3)\times SO(19)),

which we denote by ℳK3\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}. An enriched version encoding also complex structures of the K3 surfaces is

ℝ>0×(O⁡(ΛK3)\S​O0​(3,19)/(S​O​(2)×S​O​(19))).\mathbb{R}_{>0}\times(O(\Lambda_{\rm K3})\backslash SO_{0}(3,19)/(SO(2)\times SO(19))).

Roughly speaking, this is a union of Kähler cones of ADE K3 surfaces with marking of the minimal resolutions.

Thus we can again compare a Satake compactification of ℳK3\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3} with the Gromov-Hausdorff compactification. Inside the Satake compactification for the adjoint representation, we consider an open locus (a partial compactification of ℳK3\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}) ℳK3⊔ℳK3​(a),\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}\sqcup\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}(a), where ℳK3​(a)\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}(a) denotes the 3636-dimensional boundary stratum corresponding to an isotropic rational line l=ℚ​el=\mathbb{Q}e in ΛK3⊗ℚ\Lambda_{\rm K3}\otimes\mathbb{Q}, with primitive integral generator ee, which are unique up to O⁡(ΛK3)O(\Lambda_{\rm K3}). Then for each point p=⟨e,v1,v2⟩p=\langle e,v_{1},v_{2}\rangle in strata ℳK3​(a)\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}(a), we consider the marked (possibly ADE) K3 surface XpX_{p} with period ⟨v1,v2⟩\langle v_{1},v_{2}\rangle. Then it is known that there is an elliptic K3 surface structure on XpX_{p} with the fiber class ee. Then we define Φ⁡(p)\Phi(p) as its base biholomorphic to ℙ1\mathbb{P}^{1} with the McLean metric, which only depends on ⟨v1,v2⟩\langle v_{1},v_{2}\rangle. Similarly to the projective case Theorem 4.4, [OO] proves that for non-algebraic situation:

[04YT]
Theorem 5.1.

The map

Φ:ℳK3⊔ℳK3​(a)→𝐶𝑀𝑒𝑡1\Phi\colon\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}\sqcup\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}(a)\to{\it CMet}_{1}

given above is continuous. Here, we put the Gromov-Hausdorff topology for the right hand side.

In [OO], we further explicitly define an extension to the whole Satake compactification Φ:ℳK3¯Sat→𝐶𝑀𝑒𝑡1\Phi\colon\overline{\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}}^{\rm Sat}\to{\it CMet}_{1}, and conjecture that this is still continuous with respect to the Gromov-Hausdorff topology. For the boundary strata other than ℳK3​(a)\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}(a), we assign flat tori ℝi/ℤi​(i=1,2,3)\mathbb{R}^{i}/\mathbb{Z}^{i}\ (i=1,2,3) modulo (−1)(-1)-multiplication. We show that Φ\Phi restricted to the closure of the locus which parametrizes ℝ4/ℤ4\mathbb{R}^{4}/\mathbb{Z}^{4} modulo ±1\pm 1, that includes those boundary strata, is continuous. Furthermore, we also prove the restriction of Φ\Phi to the closure of ℳK3​(a)\mathcal{M}_{\rm K3}(a) is continuous by using Weierstrass models.

[04YU]

6. Higher dimensional case

We expect that our results for K3 surfaces naturally extend to higher dimensional compact hyperKähler manifolds. Let us focus on algebraic case in this notes. We set up as follows. Fix any connected moduli MM of polarized 2​n2n-dimensional irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds (X,L)(X,L) whose second cohomology H2​(X,ℤ)H^{2}(X,\mathbb{Z}) is isomorphic (as a lattice) to Λ\Lambda. By [Ver13, Mark11] ([GHS13, Theorem 3.7]), it is a Zariski open subset of a Hermitian locally symmetric space of orthogonal type Γ\𝒟M\Gamma\backslash\mathcal{D}_{M}.

Then (a rough version of) our conjecture for algebraic case (in [OO]) is as follows:

[04YV]
Conjecture 6.1.

There is a continuous map Ψ\Psi (call “geometric realization map”) from the Satake compactification (M⊂)​Γ\𝒟M¯Sat,τad(M\subset)\overline{\Gamma\backslash\mathcal{D}_{M}}^{\rm Sat,\tau_{ad}} with respect to the adjoint representation to the Gromov-Hausdorff compactification of MM, extending the identity map on MM. The (b2​(X)−4)(b_{2}(X)-4)-dimensional boundary strata of Γ\𝒟M¯Sat,τad\overline{\Gamma\backslash\mathcal{D}_{M}}^{\rm Sat,\tau_{ad}} parametrize via Ψ\Psi the projective space ℙn\mathbb{P}^{n} with special Kähler metrics in the sense of [Freed99] and the metric space parametrized by 00-dimensional cusps are all homeomorphic to the closed ball of dimension nn.

At the moment of writing this notes, the authors have only succeeded in proving that (M⊂)​Γ\𝒟M(M\subset)\Gamma\backslash\mathcal{D}_{M} is the moduli of polarized symplectic varieties with continuous (non-collapsing) weak Ricci-flat Kähler metrics, and making some progress on the necessary algebro-geometric preparations in particular for the case of K3[n]-type.

[04YW]
Remark 6.2 (Calabi-Yau case).

In [OO], we also propose an extension of Conjecture 4.3 for general Calabi-Yau varieties under some technical conditions, although there are much fewer evidences in that case.

Acknowledgement We appreciate for giving us the chances to talk on [OO] in various countries and cities. The first was at a talk by the first author at a Clay conference held at Oxford in September 2016, when Theorems 4.4 and 5.1 were only partially proved and claimed, whose confirmation in the form of this notes has taken long time. In particular, we appreciate Kenji Hashimoto, Shouhei Honda, Radu Laza, Daisuke Matsushita, Shigeru Mukai, Yoshinori Namikawa, Bernd Siebert, Cristiano Spotti, Song Sun, Yuichi Nohara, Kazushi Ueda, Ken-ichi Yoshikawa for helpful discussions. There are plans of some lecture series by the first author on this topic during the next fall semester in Nagoya, Tokyo. The first author is partially supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid (S), No. 16H06335, Grand-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists No. 18K13389. The second author is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 16K17562.

References

  • [AMRT75] A. Ash, D. Mumford, M. Rapoport, Y.-S. Tai, Smooth compactifications of locally symmetric varieties, Cambridge Mathematical Library (1st edition: 1975, 2nd edition: 2010).
  • [BJo17] S. Boucksom, M. Jonsson, Tropical and non-Archimedean limits of degenerating families of volume forms, J. Éc. polytech. Math. 4 (2017), 87–139.
  • [DW96] R. Donagi, E. Witten, Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory and integrable systems, Nuclear Phys. B 460 (1996), no. 2, 299–334.
  • [FC90] G. Faltings, C.-L. Chai, Degeneration of abelian varieties, Springer-Verlag, 1990.
  • [Freed99] D. Freed, Special Kähler manifolds, Comm. Math. Phys. 203 (1999), no. 1, 31–52.
  • [GHS13] V. Gritsenko, K. Hulek, G.K. Sankaran, Moduli of K3 surfaces and irreducible symplectic manifolds, Handbook of moduli. Vol. I, Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), 24 (2013), 459–526.
  • [Gross12] M. Gross, Mirror Symmetry and the Strominger-Yau-Zaslow conjecture, Current Developments in Mathematics 2012, 133–191, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2013.
  • [GS06] M. Gross, B. Siebert, Mirror symmetry via logarithmic degeneration data. I, J. Differential Geom. 72 (2006), no. 2, 169–338.
  • [GS11] M. Gross, B. Siebert, From real affine geometry to complex geometry, Ann. of Math. 174 (2011), no. 3, 1301–1428.
  • [GS12] M. Gross, B. Siebert, Theta functions and mirror symmetry, Surveys in differential geometry 2016. Advances in geometry and mathematical physics, 95–138, Surv. Differ. Geom., 21, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2016.
  • [GTZ13] M. Gross, V. Tosatti, Y. Zhang, Collapsing of abelian fibered Calabi-Yau manifolds, Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 3, 517–551.
  • [GTZ16] M. Gross, V. Tosatti, Y. Zhang, Gromov-Hausdorff collapsing of Calabi-Yau manifolds, Comm. Anal. Geom, 24 (2016), no. 1, 93–113.
  • [GW00] M. Gross, P. M. H. Wilson, Large complex structure limits of K3 surfaces, J. Differential Geom. 55 (2000), no. 3, 475–546.
  • [HU] K. Hashimoto and K. Ueda, Reconstruction of general elliptic K3 surfaces from their Gromov–Hausdorff limits, preprint.
  • [HNU] K. Hashimoto, Y. Nohara, K. Ueda, private communication.
  • [Hit96] N. J. Hitchin, The moduli space of complex Lagrangian submanifolds, Asian J. Math. 3 (1999), no. 1, 77–91.
  • [KT87] R. Kobayashi, A. Todorov, Polarized period map for generalized K3 surfaces and the moduli of Einstein metrics, Tohoku Math. J. (2) 39 (1987), no. 3, 341–363.
  • [KS04] M. Kontsevich, Y. Soibelman, Affine structures and non-Archimedean analytic spaces, The Unity of Mathematics, 321–385, Progr. Math. 244, Birkhäuser Boston, 2006.
  • [KW65] A. Koranyi, J. Wolf, Generalized Cayley transformations of bounded symmetric domains, Amer. J. Math. 87 (1965), 899–939.
  • [Looi81] E. Looijenga, A Torelli theorem for Kähler-Einstein K3 surfaces, 107–112, Lecture Notes in Math., 894, Springer, Berlin-New York, 1981.
  • [Mark11] E. Markman, A survey of Torelli and monodromy results for holomorphic-symplectic varieties, Complex and differential geometry, 257–322 Springer Proc. Math., 8, Springer, Heidelberg 2011.
  • [ML98] R. McLean, Deformations of calibrated submanifolds, Comm. Anal. Geom. 6 (1998), no. 4, 705–747.
  • [MS84] J. Morgan, P. B. Shalen, Valuations, trees, and degenerations of hyperbolic structures. I, Ann. of Math. 120 (1984), no. 3, 401–476.
  • [Mum72] D. Mumford, An analytic construction of degenerating abelian varieties over complete rings, Compositio Math. 24 (1972), 239–272.
  • [Od14] Y. Odaka, Tropical geometric compactification of Moduli, I - MgM_{g} case -, arXiv:1406.7772.
  • [Od16] Y. Odaka, Tropical geometric compactification of Moduli, II - AgA_{g} case and holomorphic limits -, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2018).
  • [OO] Y. Odaka, Y. Oshima, in preparataion.
  • [PS66] I.I. Piatetsky-Shapiro, Géométrie des domaines classiques et théorie des fonctions automorphes, Travaux et Rechereches Mathématiques, No. 12 Dunod, Paris 1966.
  • [Sat60a] I. Satake, On representations and compactifications of symmetric Riemannian spaces, Ann. of Math. 71 (1960), 77–110.
  • [Sat60b] I. Satake, On compactifications of the quotient spaces for arithmetically defined discontinuous groups, Ann. of Math. 72 (1960), 555–580.
  • [SYZ96] A. Strominger, S-T. Yau, E. Zaslow, Mirror symmetry is TT-duality, Nuclear Phys. B 479 (1996), no. 1-2, 243–259.
  • [Tod80] A. Todorov, Applications of the Kähler-Einstein-Calabi-Yau metric to moduli of K3 surfaces, Invent. Math. 61 (1980), no. 3, 251–265.
  • [Tos10] V. Tosatti, Adiabatic limits of Ricci-flat Kähler metrics, J. Differential Geom. 84 (2010), no. 2, 427–453.
  • [TZ17] V. Tosatti, Y. Zhang, Collapsing hyperKähler manifolds, arXiv:1705.03299.
  • [Ver13] M. Verbitsky, Mapping class group and a global Torelli theorem for hyperKähler manifolds, Appendix A by E. Markman. Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 15, 2929-2986.
  • [Yam] Y. Yamamoto, Periods of tropical K3 hypersurfaces, in preparation.
  • [Yau78] S.T. Yau, On the Ricci curvature of a compact Kähler manifold and the complex Monge-Ampére equation. I, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 31 (1978), no. 3, 339–411.

Contact (Yuji Odaka): yodaka@math.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Department of Mathematics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8285. JAPAN

Contact (Yoshiki Oshima): oshima@ist.osaka-u.ac.jp
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, JAPAN

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.