ScalingStacks

2.1. The base and the discriminant locus [03CV]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.1. The base and the discriminant locus

Consider the product Δ×Δ∨⊂(ℝd)∗×ℝd\Delta\times\Delta^{\vee}\subset(\mathbb{R}^{d})^{*}\times\mathbb{R}^{d}. The complex Σ\Sigma — our prospective base space — will be a subdivision of

(1) |Σ|={(m,n)∈Δ×Δ∨:⟨m,n⟩=1}|\Sigma|=\{(m,n)\in\Delta\times\Delta^{\vee}\ :\ \langle m,n\rangle=1\}

which is the union of all sets of the form F×F∨F\times F^{\vee}, where FF runs over all proper faces of Δ\Delta, and F∨F^{\vee} denotes the face (of Δ∨\Delta^{\vee}) dual to FF. The triangulations SS and TT induce a subdivision of Δ×Δ∨\Delta\times\Delta^{\vee} into products of simplices, which restricts to a subdivision of |Σ||\Sigma|.

[Uncaptioned image]

Figure 3: The subdivision S×TS\times T of |Σ||\Sigma| into products of simplices.

Definition.

Σ\Sigma is the restriction to |Σ||\Sigma| of the product subdivision bsd⁡(S)×bsd⁡(T)\operatorname{bsd}(S)\times\operatorname{bsd}(T) of Δ×Δ∨\Delta\times\Delta^{\vee}.

The vertices of Σ\Sigma correspond to pairs (σ^,τ^)(\widehat{\sigma},\widehat{\tau}) of (barycenters of) simplices σ∈S\sigma\in S and τ∈T\tau\in T with ⟨σ,τ⟩=1\langle\sigma,\tau\rangle=1. Under this correspondence, the cells of Σ\Sigma correspond to pairs of chains in the face posets of SS and TT.

Lemma 2.1.

Σ\Sigma is isomorphic to the boundary complex of a dd-dimensional polytope, and therefore topologically a (d−1)(d-1)-sphere.

We postpone the proof, and proceed with definitions.

Definition.

The singular locus DD is the full subcomplex of Σ\Sigma, induced by vertices (σ^,τ^)(\widehat{\sigma},\widehat{\tau}), such that neither σ\sigma nor τ\tau is 00-dimensional. (This set indeed induces a subcomplex.)

For d=2d=2, DD is empty. For d=3d=3, DD will be a finite set of ≤24\leq 24 points (with equality if SS and TT use all lattice points). For d=4d=4, DD will be the first subdivision of a trivalent graph. For all dd, the complement Σ\D\Sigma\backslash D is homotopy equivalent to a bipartite graph.

Definition.

Let Γ\Gamma be the graph on the vertex set vert⁡(S)∪vert⁡(T)\operatorname{vert}(S)\cup\operatorname{vert}(T) with an edge between v∈vert⁡(S)v\in\operatorname{vert}(S) and w∈vert⁡(T)w\in\operatorname{vert}(T) if and only if ⟨v,w⟩=1\langle v,w\rangle=1.

Lemma 2.2.

Σ\D\Sigma\backslash D is homotopy equivalent to Γ\Gamma.

First, we introduce some notation that will be used later on. There are two piecewise linear projections

p1:Σ→bsd⁡(S)​ and ​p2:Σ→bsd⁡(T).p_{1}\colon\Sigma\rightarrow\operatorname{bsd}(S)\ \text{ and }\ p_{2}\colon\Sigma\rightarrow\operatorname{bsd}(T).

For a vertex v∈vert⁡(S)v\in\operatorname{vert}(S) or w∈vert⁡(T)w\in\operatorname{vert}(T), define UvU_{v} respectively VwV_{w} to be the preimages

Uv=p1−1​(starbsd⁡(S)⁡(v))​ and ​Vw=p2−1​(starbsd⁡(T)⁡(w))U_{v}=p_{1}^{-1}(\operatorname{star}_{\operatorname{bsd}(S)}(v))\ \text{ and }\ V_{w}=p_{2}^{-1}(\operatorname{star}_{\operatorname{bsd}(T)}(w))

of open stars in the barycentric subdivisions. Thus, UvU_{v} is an open regular neighborhood of the contractible set v×(carrierΔ⁡v)∨v\times(\operatorname{carrier}_{\Delta}v)^{\vee} in Σ\Sigma, and VwV_{w} is an open regular neighborhood of (carrierΔ∨⁡w)∨×w(\operatorname{carrier}_{\Delta^{\vee}}w)^{\vee}\times w. We will abbreviate the collections by 𝒰=(Uv)v∈vert⁡(S)\mathcal{U}=(U_{v})_{v\in\operatorname{vert}(S)} and 𝒱=(Vw)w∈vert⁡(T)\mathcal{V}=(V_{w})_{w\in\operatorname{vert}(T)}. For future reference, define 𝒰¯=(U¯v)v∈vert⁡(S)\overline{\mathcal{U}}=(\overline{U}_{v})_{v\in\operatorname{vert}(S)} and 𝒱¯=(V¯w)w∈vert⁡(T)\overline{\mathcal{V}}=(\overline{V}_{w})_{w\in\operatorname{vert}(T)}, as well as ∂𝒰=⋃∂⁡Uv\partial\mathcal{U}=\bigcup\partial U_{v} and ∂𝒱=⋃∂⁡Vw\partial\mathcal{V}=\bigcup\partial V_{w}. Observe that with these definitions ⋃𝒰∪⋃𝒱=Σ\D\bigcup\mathcal{U}\cup\bigcup\mathcal{V}=\Sigma\backslash D, and ∂𝒰∩∂𝒱=D\partial\mathcal{U}\cap\partial\mathcal{V}=D.

[Uncaptioned image]

Figure 4: The dotted lines are ∂𝒰\partial\mathcal{U}, and the dashed lines are ∂𝒱\partial\mathcal{V}. Their intersection DD consists of 99 points.

Proof of Lemma 2.2.

Two members UvU_{v} and VwV_{w} of this covering intersect if and only if

v∈(carrierΔ∨⁡w)∨⇔w∈(carrierΔ⁡v)∨⇔⟨v,w⟩=1,v\in(\operatorname{carrier}_{\Delta^{\vee}}w)^{\vee}\iff w\in(\operatorname{carrier}_{\Delta}v)^{\vee}\iff\langle v,w\rangle=1,

in which case they intersect in the contractible set starΣ⁡((,,,))\operatorname{star}_{\Sigma}((v,w)). So the claimed homotopy equivalence follows from the nerve lemma (cf. e.g. [Bjö95, Thm. 10.6]). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.