Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Consider the product . The
complex — our prospective base space — will be a
subdivision of
(1)
which is the union of all sets of the form , where
runs over all proper faces of , and denotes the face (of
) dual to .
The triangulations and induce a subdivision of into products of simplices, which restricts to a subdivision of
.
Figure 3:
The subdivision of into products
of simplices.
Definition.
is the restriction to of the product
subdivision of .
The vertices of correspond to pairs
of (barycenters of) simplices and with . Under this
correspondence, the cells of correspond to pairs of chains in
the face posets of and .
Lemma 2.1.
is isomorphic to the boundary complex of a -dimensional
polytope, and therefore topologically a -sphere.
We postpone the proof, and proceed with definitions.
Definition.
The singular locus is the full subcomplex of , induced
by vertices , such that neither
nor is -dimensional. (This set indeed induces a
subcomplex.)
For , is empty. For , will be a finite set of points (with equality if and use all lattice points). For
, will be the first subdivision of a trivalent graph.
For all , the complement is homotopy equivalent to a
bipartite graph.
Definition.
Let be the graph on the vertex set
with an edge between and if and only
if .
Lemma 2.2.
is homotopy equivalent to .
First, we introduce some notation that will be used later on.
There are two piecewise linear projections
For a vertex or , define
respectively to be the preimages
of open stars in the barycentric subdivisions. Thus, is an open
regular neighborhood of the contractible set in , and is an open regular
neighborhood of .
We will abbreviate the collections by and
. For future reference, define
and , as well as and .
Observe that with these definitions , and .
Figure 4:
The dotted lines are , and the dashed lines are
. Their intersection consists of points.
Two members and of this covering intersect if and only
if
in which case they intersect in the contractible set
. So the claimed homotopy equivalence follows
from the nerve lemma (cf. e.g. [Bjö95, Thm. 10.6]).
∎