Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Proof: By Corollary 5.12, and (a) follows. To prove (b), it is enough to show
(3)
for a non-empty very affine open subset of by using (a).
The differential form is given on (resp. ) by (resp. ). By 4.12, there is an affine homomorphism of the underlying canonical tori such that . It follows that is given on also by . By Proposition 5.6, we have . The Sturmfels–Tevelev multiplicity formula shows that (see Proposition 4.11). Then Proposition 3.10 shows that
(3) holds.