If under
the convergence of to , we claim that a subsequence of converges to a point
under the metric on .
By Lemma 5.1, there is a compact neighborhood of and a
section such
that under the Gromov-Hausdorff
convergence of to .
Thus when . By Lemma
4.1, there
are curves connecting and such
that ,
and
|
|
|
For a , if there is a , then
|
|
|
where such that , which is a contradiction.
Thus for ,
and converges to under the metric .
By passing to a subsequence, converges to a point
under the metric .
Since for a constant ,
Hence and .
Let satisfy , and
is a geodesically convex subset of .
If , there is a
curve
connecting and such that
is the unique minimal geodesic connecting and . Thanks to (4.18) we have
|
|
|
where
when , on
. We obtain that
|
|
|
If is a minimal geodesic of
connecting and , then (4.19) gives
|
|
|
If , then
|
|
|
and, otherwise,
|
|
|
by the same argument as in the proof of Lemma 5.1. Thus
|
|
|
where is a constant independent of
, and . Of course if is large we will have that
|
|
|
Thanks to (4.1), there is constant
independent of such that on . Let
be minimal geodesics of connecting
and , which satisfy for .
Thus
|
|
|
The
triangle inequality shows that
|
|
|
Hence there is a function of such that
when , and
|
|
|
We obtain that
|
|
|
Note that
|
|
|
Hence
|
|
|
when . By (5.1),
|
|
|
Recall the diameter bound (1.4)
|
|
|
for a constant .
Using (5.1), we have
|
|
|
∎