ScalingStacks

Proof. [031N]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

If pk→xp_{k}\rightarrow x under the convergence of (M,ω~tk)(M,\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}) to (X,dX)(X,d_{X}), we claim that a subsequence of pkp_{k} converges to a point p′∈f−1​(ϕ−1​(x))p^{\prime}\in f^{-1}(\phi^{-1}(x)) under the metric ωM\omega_{M} on MM. By Lemma 5.1, there is a compact neighborhood B⊂N0B\subset N_{0} of ϕ−1​(x)\phi^{-1}(x) and a section s:B→f−1​(B)s:B\rightarrow f^{-1}(B) such that s​(ϕ−1​(x))→xs(\phi^{-1}(x))\rightarrow x under the Gromov-Hausdorff convergence of (M,ω~tk)(M,\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}) to (X,dX)(X,d_{X}). Thus dω~tk​(pk,s⁡(ϕ−1​(x)))→0d_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p_{k},s(\phi^{-1}(x)))\rightarrow 0 when tk→0t_{k}\rightarrow 0. By Lemma 4.1, there are curves γk\gamma_{k} connecting pkp_{k} and s​(ϕ−1​(x))s(\phi^{-1}(x)) such that lengthω~tk​(γk)=dω~tk​(pk,s⁡(ϕ−1​(x))){\rm length}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(\gamma_{k})=d_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p_{k},s(\phi^{-1}(x))), and

lengthω0​(f⁡(γk)∩B)=lengthf∗​ω0​(γk∩f−1​(B))⩽C12​lengthω~tk​(γk)→0.{\rm length}_{\omega_{0}}(f(\gamma_{k})\cap B)={\rm length}_{f^{*}\omega_{0}}(\gamma_{k}\cap f^{-1}(B))\leqslant C^{\frac{1}{2}}{\rm length}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(\gamma_{k})\rightarrow 0.

For a k≫1k\gg 1, if there is a yk∈f⁡(γk)\By_{k}\in f(\gamma_{k})\backslash B, then

lengthω0​(f⁡(γk)∩B)⩾dω0​(yk,ϕ−1​(x))⩾ρ,{\rm length}_{\omega_{0}}(f(\gamma_{k})\cap B)\geqslant d_{\omega_{0}}(y_{k},\phi^{-1}(x))\geqslant\rho,

where ρ>0\rho>0 such that Bω0​(ϕ−1​(x),ρ)⊂BB_{\omega_{0}}(\phi^{-1}(x),\rho)\subset B, which is a contradiction. Thus f⁡(γk)⊂Bf(\gamma_{k})\subset B for k≫1k\gg 1, lengthω0​(f⁡(γk))→0{\rm length}_{\omega_{0}}(f(\gamma_{k}))\rightarrow 0 and f⁡(pk)f(p_{k}) converges to ϕ−1​(x)\phi^{-1}(x) under the metric ω0\omega_{0}. By passing to a subsequence, pkp_{k} converges to a point p′p^{\prime} under the metric ωM\omega_{M}. Since f∗​ω0⩽C′​ωMf^{*}\omega_{0}\leqslant C^{\prime}\omega_{M} for a constant C′>0C^{\prime}>0, dω0​(f⁡(pk),f⁡(p′))⩽C′12​dωM​(pk,p′)→0.d_{\omega_{0}}(f(p_{k}),f(p^{\prime}))\leqslant C^{\prime\frac{1}{2}}d_{\omega_{M}}(p_{k},p^{\prime})\rightarrow 0. Hence f⁡(p′)=ϕ−1​(x)f(p^{\prime})=\phi^{-1}(x) and p′∈f−1​(ϕ−1​(x))p^{\prime}\in f^{-1}(\phi^{-1}(x)).

Let rr satisfy r⩽1r\leqslant 1, and Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),2​r)B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),2r) is a geodesically convex subset of (N0,ω)(N_{0},\omega). If q∈f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),2​r))q\in f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),2r)), there is a curve γ¯\bar{\gamma} connecting p′p^{\prime} and qq such that f⁡(γ¯)f(\bar{\gamma}) is the unique minimal geodesic connecting ϕ−1​(x)\phi^{-1}(x) and f⁡(q)f(q). Thanks to (4.18) we have

f∗​ω−ε⁡(tk)​ωM⩽ω~tk⩽f∗​ω+ε⁡(tk)​ωMf^{*}\omega-\varepsilon(t_{k})\omega_{M}\leqslant\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}\leqslant f^{*}\omega+\varepsilon(t_{k})\omega_{M}

where ε⁡(tk)→0\varepsilon(t_{k})\rightarrow 0 when tk→0t_{k}\rightarrow 0, on f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),2​r))f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),2r)). We obtain that

dω~tk​(p′,q)⩽lengthω~tk​(γ¯)⩽lengthω​(f⁡(γ¯))+C​ε​(tk)12=dω​(ϕ−1​(x),f⁡(q))+C​ε​(tk)12.\begin{split}d_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p^{\prime},q)&\leqslant{\rm length}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(\bar{\gamma})\\ &\leqslant{\rm length}_{\omega}(f(\bar{\gamma}))+C\varepsilon(t_{k})^{\frac{1}{2}}\\ &=d_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),f(q))+C\varepsilon(t_{k})^{\frac{1}{2}}.\end{split}

If γ¯k\bar{\gamma}_{k} is a minimal geodesic of ω~tk\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}} connecting p′p^{\prime} and qq, then (4.19) gives

dω~tk​(p′,q)=lengthω~tk​(γ¯k)⩾e−ε⁡(tk)2​lengthω​(f⁡(γ¯k)∩Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),2​r)).d_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p^{\prime},q)={\rm length}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(\bar{\gamma}_{k})\geqslant e^{-\frac{\varepsilon(t_{k})}{2}}{\rm length}_{\omega}(f(\bar{\gamma}_{k})\cap B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),2r)).

If f⁡(γ¯k)⊂Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),2​r)f(\bar{\gamma}_{k})\subset B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),2r), then

lengthω​(f⁡(γ¯k)∩Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),2​r))⩾lengthω​(f⁡(γ¯))=dω​(ϕ−1​(x),f⁡(q)),{\rm length}_{\omega}(f(\bar{\gamma}_{k})\cap B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),2r))\geqslant{\rm length}_{\omega}(f(\bar{\gamma}))=d_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),f(q)),

and, otherwise,

lengthω​(f⁡(γ¯k)∩Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),2​r))⩾2​r⩾lengthω​(f⁡(γ¯))=dω​(ϕ−1​(x),f⁡(q)),{\rm length}_{\omega}(f(\bar{\gamma}_{k})\cap B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),2r))\geqslant 2r\geqslant{\rm length}_{\omega}(f(\bar{\gamma}))=d_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),f(q)),

by the same argument as in the proof of Lemma 5.1. Thus

e−ε⁡(tk)2​dω​(ϕ−1​(x),f⁡(q))⩽dω~tk​(p′,q)⩽dω​(ϕ−1​(x),f⁡(q))+C​ε​(tk)12e^{-\frac{\varepsilon(t_{k})}{2}}d_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),f(q))\leqslant d_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p^{\prime},q)\leqslant d_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),f(q))+C\varepsilon(t_{k})^{\frac{1}{2}}

where CC is a constant independent of tkt_{k}, p′p^{\prime} and qq. Of course if kk is large we will have that

dω​(ϕ−1​(x),f⁡(q))−C​ε​(tk)12⩽e−ε⁡(tk)2​dω​(ϕ−1​(x),f⁡(q)).d_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),f(q))-C\varepsilon(t_{k})^{\frac{1}{2}}\leqslant e^{-\frac{\varepsilon(t_{k})}{2}}d_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),f(q)).

Thanks to (4.1), there is constant C>0C>0 independent of tkt_{k} such that ω~tk⩽C​ωM\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}\leqslant C\omega_{M} on f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),2​r))f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),2r)). Let γk′\gamma^{\prime}_{k} be minimal geodesics of ωM\omega_{M} connecting pkp_{k} and p′p^{\prime}, which satisfy γk′⊂f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),2​r))\gamma^{\prime}_{k}\subset f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),2r)) for k≫1k\gg 1. Thus

dω~tk​(p′,pk)⩽lengthω~tk​(γk′)⩽C12​lengthωM​(γk′)=C12​dωM​(p′,pk)→0.d_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p^{\prime},p_{k})\leqslant{\rm length}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(\gamma^{\prime}_{k})\leqslant C^{\frac{1}{2}}{\rm length}_{\omega_{M}}(\gamma^{\prime}_{k})=C^{\frac{1}{2}}d_{\omega_{M}}(p^{\prime},p_{k})\rightarrow 0.

The triangle inequality shows that

|dω~tk​(pk,q)−dω​(ϕ−1​(x),f⁡(q))|⩽C​ε​(tk)12+C12​dωM​(p′,pk).|d_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p_{k},q)-d_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),f(q))|\leqslant C\varepsilon(t_{k})^{\frac{1}{2}}+C^{\frac{1}{2}}d_{\omega_{M}}(p^{\prime},p_{k}).

Hence there is a function ρ⁡(tk)\rho(t_{k}) of tkt_{k} such that ρ⁡(tk)→0\rho(t_{k})\rightarrow 0 when tk→0t_{k}\rightarrow 0, and

f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),r−ρ⁡(tk)))⊂Bω~tk​(pk,r)⊂f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),r+ρ⁡(tk))).f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),r-\rho(t_{k})))\subset B_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p_{k},r)\subset f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),r+\rho(t_{k}))).

We obtain that

limtk→0∫Bω~tk​(pk,r)ωMn=∫f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),r))ωMn.\lim_{t_{k}\rightarrow 0}\int_{B_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p_{k},r)}\omega_{M}^{n}=\int_{f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),r))}\omega_{M}^{n}.

Note that

ω~tkn=ctk​tkn−m​ωMn.\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}^{n}=c_{t_{k}}t_{k}^{n-m}\omega_{M}^{n}.

Hence

V¯k​(pk,r)=Volω~tk​(Bω~tk​(pk,r))Volω~tk​(Bω~tk​(p¯k,1))=∫Bω~tk​(pk,r)ctk​tkn−m​ωMn∫Bω~tk​(p¯k,1)ctk​tkn−m​ωMn→∫f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),r))ωMn∫f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x¯),1))ωMn,\begin{split}\underline{V}_{k}(p_{k},r)&=\frac{{\rm Vol}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(B_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p_{k},r))}{{\rm Vol}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(B_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(\bar{p}_{k},1))}\\ &=\frac{\int_{B_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(p_{k},r)}c_{t_{k}}t_{k}^{n-m}\omega_{M}^{n}}{\int_{B_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(\bar{p}_{k},1)}c_{t_{k}}t_{k}^{n-m}\omega_{M}^{n}}\to\frac{\int_{f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),r))}\omega_{M}^{n}}{\int_{f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(\bar{x}),1))}\omega_{M}^{n}},\end{split}

when tk→0t_{k}\rightarrow 0. By (5.1),

V¯0​(x,r)=υ​∫f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x),r))ωMn,whereυ=(∫f−1​(Bω​(ϕ−1​(x¯),1))ωMn)−1.\underline{V}_{0}(x,r)=\upsilon\int_{f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(x),r))}\omega_{M}^{n},\ \ {\rm where}\ \ \upsilon=\left(\int_{f^{-1}(B_{\omega}(\phi^{-1}(\bar{x}),1))}\omega_{M}^{n}\right)^{-1}.

Recall the diameter bound (1.4)

diamω~tk​(M)⩽D{\rm diam}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t_{k}}}(M)\leqslant D

for a constant D>0D>0. Using (5.1), we have

ν⁡(X)=V¯0​(x,D)=limtk→0V¯k​(pk,D)=υ​∫MωMn.\nu(X)=\underline{V}_{0}(x,D)=\lim_{t_{k}\rightarrow 0}\underline{V}_{k}(p_{k},D)=\upsilon\int_{M}\omega_{M}^{n}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.