ScalingStacks

Remark 4.10 . [031I]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 4.10.

In fact the proof of Proposition 4.9 shows that if we just have that ω~t→f∗​ω\tilde{\omega}_{t}\to f^{*}\omega in Cl​o​c0​(M\S)C^{0}_{loc}(M\backslash S) (or in the C2C^{2} topology of Kähler potentials) then (1.3) holds in the C1,αC^{1,\alpha} topology of Kähler potentials. It seems that just having ω~t→f∗​ω\tilde{\omega}_{t}\to f^{*}\omega in the C1,αC^{1,\alpha} topology of Kähler potentials (which is proved in [38] in general) is not quite enough to deduce (1.3).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.