For simplicity of notation call and
. On each fiber we have
that for some smooth function
normalized by . The
functions vary smoothly in , because so
do the Kähler metrics . The unique Ricci–flat metric on
cohomologous to is given by
and solves the complex
Monge-Ampère equation on
|
|
|
Recall from [38, Section 2] that we have
|
|
|
where is a smooth function on that vanishes precisely on .
A simple calculation [38, (3.5)] shows that on we have
|
|
|
since we picked to be Ricci–flat. It
follows that on the functions and differ by a
constant, which we can identify as follows: thanks to Yau’s
estimates, the functions vary smoothly in and so they
define a smooth function on . We then defined
, which is a semi-flat form on
(here semi-flat means that its restriction to each
fiber is Ricci–flat). This semi-flat form is in general
different from the one constructed locally in section 3,
although they are equal when restricted to each fiber .
Even though is not necessarily nonnegative, on
the -form
is strictly positive, and so we can define a smooth positive
function on by
| (4.24) |
|
|
|
It is shown in [35, Lemma 3.3], [38, p.445] that is a positive constant on each fiber , and we claim we have
| (4.25) |
|
|
|
This is because on we have
|
|
|
On we can then write, using (1.1), (4.25)
| (4.26) |
|
|
|
We also have a pointwise identity on
|
|
|
and we will write
|
|
|
so that we can recast (4.26) as
| (4.27) |
|
|
|
Notice that the functions are the restriction to of smooth functions on . We claim that as approaches zero the functions converge to in . To see this, first of all note that by definition we have
| (4.28) |
|
|
|
see also [10], [38, (2.6)].
We now use the assumption (4.22), and so the functions converge smoothly to
| (4.29) |
|
|
|
To see why this equals one, recall from [38, (4.3)] that the limit metric on satisfies
| (4.30) |
|
|
|
where our function is defined so that it differs from the function in [38, (4.3)]
by the constant factor .
Substituting (4.30) into (4.29) we see that the limit of equals
|
|
|
Note now that from the main result of [38] we have that on each fiber
| (4.31) |
|
|
|
where is uniform as varies in a compact set of .
From the definition on we have
|
|
|
where satisfies the estimate (4.21).
The metrics satisfy the
complex Monge-Ampère equations on
| (4.32) |
|
|
|
and we have just shown that the functions are bounded in
and away from zero, so we can apply the theory of Evans-Krylov
and Schauder estimates on to (4.32) (using (4.21) and (4.31)) to get bounds
|
|
|
independent of . It follows that given any sequence we can find a subsequence (still denoted by ) and a smooth Kähler metric on so that in . Equation (4.27) in the limit becomes
|
|
|
and so by the uniqueness of Ricci–flat metrics in a given
cohomology class we must have . Therefore
the whole sequence converges smoothly to
as desired, and the convergence is uniform as
varies on compact sets of .
∎