Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
We set
Then am+m′≤am+am′a_{m+m^{\prime}}\leq a_{m}+a_{m^{\prime}} by (3) in Lemma 3.5, and hence limm→∞am/m=inf{am/m}\lim_{m\to\infty}a_{m}/m=\inf\{a_{m}/m\} by Fekete’s lemma. For ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there is ene_{n} such that
for all x∈Xanx\in X^{\mathrm{an}}, where hn={|.|(Vn,‖.‖n)quot(x)}x∈Xanh_{n}=\big\{|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}|^{\operatorname{quot}}_{(V_{n},\|\raisebox{1.20552pt}{.}\|_{n})}(x)\big\}_{x\in X^{\operatorname{an}}}. Thus
so that e−enϵ|.|henquot(x)≤|.|hnquot(x)≤eenϵ|.|henquot(x)e^{-e_{n}\epsilon}|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}|^{\mathrm{quot}}_{h^{e_{n}}}(x)\leq|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}|^{\mathrm{quot}}_{h_{n}}(x)\leq e^{e_{n}\epsilon}|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}|^{\mathrm{quot}}_{h^{e_{n}}}(x). Thus, by Proposition 3.6,
Therefore,
that is, 0≤aen/en≤2ϵ0\leq a_{e_{n}}/e_{n}\leq 2\epsilon, and hence 0≤limm→∞am/m≤2ϵ0\leq\lim_{m\to\infty}a_{m}/m\leq 2\epsilon, as required. ∎
110 source-bound objects; statement and proof tags appear beside their original text.