ScalingStacks

Proof. [026T]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

We set I:={i∣e~i≠0 in H0​(X,L)}I:=\{i\mid\text{$\tilde{e}_{i}\not=0$ in $H^{0}(X,L)$}\} and Ui:={p∈X∣e~i≠0 at p}U_{i}:=\{p\in X\mid\text{$\tilde{e}_{i}\not=0$ at $p$}\} for i∈Ii\in I.

Claim 3.3.1.

For a fixed j∈Ij\in I, if we set e~i=ai​j​e~j\tilde{e}_{i}=a_{ij}\tilde{e}_{j} on UjU_{j} (ai​j∈𝒪Uja_{ij}\in\mathscr{O}_{U_{j}}), then

|e~j|V¯quot​(x)=1maxi=0,…,r⁡{|ai​j|x‖ei‖}|\tilde{e}_{j}|_{\overline{V}}^{\mathrm{quot}}(x)=\frac{1}{\displaystyle{\max_{i=0,\ldots,r}\left\{\frac{|a_{ij}|_{x}}{\|e_{i}\|}\right\}}}

on UjanU_{j}^{\mathrm{an}}.

Proof.

We set ci=‖ei‖c_{i}=\|e_{i}\| for i=0,…,ri=0,\ldots,r. Without loss of generality, we may assume that j=0j=0, that is, we need to show that

|e~0|V¯quot​(x)=1max⁡{1/c0,|a10|x/c1,…,|ar​0|x/cr}.|\tilde{e}_{0}|_{\overline{V}}^{\mathrm{quot}}(x)=\frac{1}{\max\{1/c_{0},|a_{10}|_{x}/c_{1},\ldots,|a_{r0}|_{x}/c_{r}\}}.

Since

ker(πx:V⊗kκ^(x)→L⊗𝒪Xκ^(x))=⟨e1−a10(x)e0,…,er−ar​0(x)e0⟩\ker(\pi_{x}:V\otimes_{k}\hat{\kappa}(x)\to L\otimes_{\mathscr{O}_{X}}\hat{\kappa}(x))=\langle e_{1}-a_{10}(x)e_{0},\ldots,e_{r}-a_{r0}(x)e_{0}\rangle

for x∈U0anx\in U^{\mathrm{an}}_{0}, we have

|e~0|V¯quot(x)=inf{f(λ1,…,λr)|(λ1,…,λr)∈κ^(x)r},|\tilde{e}_{0}|_{\overline{V}}^{\mathrm{quot}}(x)=\inf\left.\left\{f(\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{r})\ \right|\ (\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{r})\in\hat{\kappa}(x)^{r}\right\},

where f⁡(λ1,…,λr):=‖e0+∑i=1rλi​(ei−ai​0​(x)​e0)‖κ^​(x)f(\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{r}):=\big\|e_{0}+\sum_{i=1}^{r}\lambda_{i}(e_{i}-a_{i0}(x)e_{0})\big\|_{\hat{\kappa}(x)}. Note that

f⁡(λ1,…,λr)=max⁡{c0​|1−∑i=1rλi​ai​0​(x)|x,c1​|λ1|x,…,cr​|λr|x}.f(\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{r})=\max\left\{c_{0}\left|1-\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{r}\lambda_{i}a_{i0}(x)\right|_{x},c_{1}|\lambda_{1}|_{x},\ldots,c_{r}|\lambda_{r}|_{x}\right\}.

As

max⁡{α0,…,αr}​max​{β0,…,βr}≥max⁡{α0​β0,…,αr​βr}\max\{\alpha_{0},\ldots,\alpha_{r}\}\max\{\beta_{0},\ldots,\beta_{r}\}\geq\max\{\alpha_{0}\beta_{0},\ldots,\alpha_{r}\beta_{r}\}

for α0,…,αr,β0,…,βr∈ℝ≥0\alpha_{0},\ldots,\alpha_{r},\beta_{0},\ldots,\beta_{r}\in\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}, we have

f⁡(λ1,…,λr)⋅max⁡{1/c0,|a10​(x)|x/c1,…,|ar​0​(x)|x/cr}≥max⁡{|1−∑i=1rλi​ai​0​(x)|x,|λ1​a10​(x)|x,…,|λr​ar​0​(x)|x}≥|1−∑i=1rλi​ai​0​(x)+∑i=1rλi​ai​0​(x)|x=1.f(\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{r})\cdot\max\{1/c_{0},|a_{10}(x)|_{x}/c_{1},\ldots,|a_{r0}(x)|_{x}/c_{r}\}\\ \geq\max\left\{\left|1-\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{r}\lambda_{i}a_{i0}(x)\right|_{x},|\lambda_{1}a_{10}(x)|_{x},\ldots,|\lambda_{r}a_{r0}(x)|_{x}\right\}\\ \geq\left|1-\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{r}\lambda_{i}a_{i0}(x)+\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{r}\lambda_{i}a_{i0}(x)\right|_{x}=1.

Therefore, we obtain

inf{f(λ1,…,λr)|(λ1,…,λr)∈κ^(x)n}≥1max⁡{1/c0,|a10​(x)|x/c1,…,|ar​0​(x)|x/cr}.\inf\left.\left\{f(\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{r})\ \right|\ (\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{r})\in\hat{\kappa}(x)^{n}\right\}\\ \geq\frac{1}{\max\{1/c_{0},|a_{10}(x)|_{x}/c_{1},\ldots,|a_{r0}(x)|_{x}/c_{r}\}}.

We need to see that

f⁡(η1,…,ηr)=1max⁡{1/c0,|a10​(x)|x/c1,…,|ar​0​(x)|x/cr}.f(\eta_{1},\ldots,\eta_{r})=\frac{1}{\max\{1/c_{0},|a_{10}(x)|_{x}/c_{1},\ldots,|a_{r0}(x)|_{x}/c_{r}\}}.

for some η1,…,ηr∈κ^​(x)\eta_{1},\ldots,\eta_{r}\in\hat{\kappa}(x). As f⁡(0,…,0)=c0f(0,\ldots,0)=c_{0}, the assertion holds if

max⁡{1/c0,|a10​(x)|x/c1,…,|ar​0​(x)|x/cr}=1/c0.\max\{1/c_{0},|a_{10}(x)|_{x}/c_{1},\ldots,|a_{r0}(x)|_{x}/c_{r}\}=1/c_{0}.

Next we assume that

max⁡{1/c0,|a10​(x)|x/c1,…,|ar​0​(x)|x/cr}=|ai​0​(x)|x/ci\max\{1/c_{0},|a_{10}(x)|_{x}/c_{1},\ldots,|a_{r0}(x)|_{x}/c_{r}\}=|a_{i0}(x)|_{x}/c_{i}

for some ii. Clearly ai​0​(x)≠0a_{i0}(x)\not=0. If we set

ηj={0if j≠i,1/ai​0​(x)if j=i,\eta_{j}=\begin{cases}0&\text{if $j\not=i$},\\ 1/a_{i0}(x)&\text{if $j=i$},\end{cases}

then f⁡(η1,…,ηn)=ci/|ai​0​(x)|xf(\eta_{1},\ldots,\eta_{n})=c_{i}/|a_{i0}(x)|_{x}, as required. ∎

If we set s=f​e~js=f\tilde{e}_{j} on UjU_{j} (f∈𝒪Ujf\in\mathscr{O}_{U_{j}}), then |s|V¯quot​(x)=|f|x|​e~j|V¯quot​(x)|s|_{\overline{V}}^{\mathrm{quot}}(x)=|f|_{x}|\tilde{e}_{j}|_{\overline{V}}^{\mathrm{quot}}(x) on UjanU_{j}^{\mathrm{an}}, so that, by Claim 3.3.1,

|s|V¯quot​(x)=|f|xmaxi=0,…,r⁡{|ai​j|x‖ei‖}.|s|_{\overline{V}}^{\mathrm{quot}}(x)=\frac{|f|_{x}}{\displaystyle{\max_{i=0,\ldots,r}\left\{\frac{|a_{ij}|_{x}}{\|e_{i}\|}\right\}}}.

On the other hand, |s|h​(x)=|f|x|​e~j|h​(x)|s|_{h}(x)=|f|_{x}|\tilde{e}_{j}|_{h}(x) and |e~i|h​(x)=|ai​j|x|​e~j|h​(x)|\tilde{e}_{i}|_{h}(x)=|a_{ij}|_{x}|\tilde{e}_{j}|_{h}(x) for i=0,…,ri=0,\ldots,r. Thus

|s|V¯quot​(x)=|s|h​(x)maxi=0,…,n⁡{|e~i|h​(x)‖ei‖}|s|_{\overline{V}}^{\mathrm{quot}}(x)=\frac{|s|_{h}(x)}{{\displaystyle\max_{i=0,\ldots,n}\left\{\frac{|\tilde{e}_{i}|_{h}(x)}{\|e_{i}\|}\right\}}}

on UjanU_{j}^{\mathrm{an}}. Therefore, the assertion follows because X=⋃j∈IUjX=\bigcup_{j\in I}U_{j}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.