ScalingStacks

Proof. [026N]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

Clearly, we may assume that lβ‰ 0l\not=0. Let 𝒴\mathscr{Y} be the Zariski closure of YY in 𝒳\mathscr{X} (cf. Β§1.1.7).

Claim 3.2.1.

There are a positive integer aa and α∈kΓ—\alpha\in k^{\times} such that

eβˆ’aΟ΅/2≀βˆ₯Ξ±lβŠ—aβˆ₯Y,ha≀1.e^{-a\epsilon/2}\leq\|\alpha l^{\otimes a}\|_{Y,h^{a}}\leq 1.
Proof.

First we assume that |.||\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}| is discrete. We take a positive integer aa such that eβˆ’Ο΅a/2≀|Ο–|e^{-\epsilon a/2}\leq|\varpi|. We also choose α∈kΓ—\alpha\in k^{\times} such that

|Ξ±βˆ’1|=min⁑{|Ξ³|∣γ∈kΓ—Β andΒ β€–lβŠ—aβ€–Y,ha≀|Ξ³|}.|\alpha^{-1}|=\min\{|\gamma|\mid\text{$\gamma\in k^{\times}$ and $\|l^{\otimes a}\|_{Y,h^{a}}\leq|\gamma|$}\}.

Then, as β€–lβŠ—aβ€–Y,ha≀|Ξ±βˆ’1|≀|Ο–|βˆ’1​‖lβŠ—aβ€–Y,ha\|l^{\otimes a}\|_{Y,h^{a}}\leq|\alpha^{-1}|\leq|\varpi|^{-1}\|l^{\otimes a}\|_{Y,h^{a}}, we have

eβˆ’aΟ΅/2≀|Ο–|≀βˆ₯Ξ±lβŠ—aβˆ₯Y,ha≀1.e^{-a\epsilon/2}\leq|\varpi|\leq\|\alpha l^{\otimes a}\|_{Y,h^{a}}\leq 1.

Next we assume that |.||\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}| is not discrete. In this case, |kΓ—||k^{\times}| is dense in ℝ>0\mathbb{R}_{>0} by LemmaΒ 1.15, so that we can choose β∈kΓ—\beta\in k^{\times} such that

eβˆ’Ο΅/2≀βˆ₯lβˆ₯Y,h/|Ξ²|≀1.e^{-\epsilon/2}\leq\|l\|_{Y,h}/|\beta|\leq 1.

Thus if we set Ξ±=Ξ²βˆ’1\alpha=\beta^{-1} and a=1a=1, we have the assertion. ∎

By CorollaryΒ 2.2, there is Ξ²βˆˆπ”¬Kβˆ–{0}\beta\in\mathfrak{o}_{K}\setminus\{0\} such that

β​(α​lβŠ—a)βŠ—m∈H0​(𝒴,β„’βŠ—a​m|𝒴)\beta(\alpha l^{\otimes a})^{\otimes m}\in H^{0}(\mathscr{Y},\left.{\mathscr{L}^{\otimes am}}\right|_{{\mathscr{Y}}})

for all mβ‰₯0m\geq 0. We choose a positive integer mm such that |Ξ²|βˆ’1≀ea​m​ϡ/2|\beta|^{-1}\leq e^{am\epsilon/2} and

H0​(𝒳,β„’βŠ—a​m)β†’H0​(𝒴,β„’βŠ—a​m|𝒴)H^{0}(\mathscr{X},\mathscr{L}^{\otimes am})\to H^{0}(\mathscr{Y},\left.{\mathscr{L}^{\otimes am}}\right|_{{\mathscr{Y}}})

is surjective, so that we can find lm∈H0​(𝒳,β„’βŠ—a​m)l_{m}\in H^{0}(\mathscr{X},\mathscr{L}^{\otimes am}) such that lm|𝒴=β​(α​lβŠ—a)βŠ—m\left.{l_{m}}\right|_{{\mathscr{Y}}}=\beta(\alpha l^{\otimes a})^{\otimes m}. Note that β€–lmβ€–ha​m≀1\|l_{m}\|_{h^{am}}\leq 1. Thus, if we set s=Ξ²βˆ’1β€‹Ξ±βˆ’m​lms=\beta^{-1}\alpha^{-m}l_{m}, then s|𝒴=lβŠ—a​m\left.{s}\right|_{{\mathscr{Y}}}=l^{\otimes am} and

β€–sβ€–ha​m\displaystyle\|s\|_{h^{am}} =|Ξ²|βˆ’1​|Ξ±|βˆ’m​‖lmβ€–ha​m≀ea​m​ϡ/2​|Ξ±|βˆ’m\displaystyle=|\beta|^{-1}|\alpha|^{-m}\|l_{m}\|_{h^{am}}\leq e^{am\epsilon/2}|\alpha|^{-m}
≀ea​m​ϡ/2​|Ξ±|βˆ’m​(ea​ϡ/2​‖α​lβŠ—aβ€–Y,ha)m=ea​m​ϡ​(β€–lβ€–Y,h)a​m,\displaystyle\leq e^{am\epsilon/2}|\alpha|^{-m}\left(e^{a\epsilon/2}\|\alpha l^{\otimes a}\|_{Y,h^{a}}\right)^{m}=e^{am\epsilon}\left(\|l\|_{Y,h}\right)^{am},

as required. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.