ScalingStacks

1.3.3. Lattices and norms [025Y]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

1.3.3. Lattices and norms

From now on and until the end of the subsection , we assume that |.||\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}| is non-trivial. Let 𝒱\mathscr{V} be an 𝔬k\mathfrak{o}_{k}-submodule of VV. We say that 𝒱\mathscr{V} is a lattice of VV if π’±βŠ—π”¬kk=V\mathscr{V}\otimes_{\mathfrak{o}_{k}}k=V and

sup{β€–vβ€–0∣vβˆˆπ’±}<∞\sup\{\|v\|_{0}\mid v\in\mathscr{V}\}<\infty

for some norm β€–.β€–0\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{0} of VV. Note that the condition sup{β€–vβ€–0∣vβˆˆπ’±}<∞\sup\{\|v\|_{0}\mid v\in\mathscr{V}\}<\infty does not depend on the choice of the norm β€–.β€–0\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{0} since all norms on VV are equivalent. For a lattice 𝒱\mathscr{V} of VV, we define β€–.‖𝒱\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}} to be

β€–v‖𝒱:=inf{|a|βˆ’1∣a∈kΓ—Β andΒ a​vβˆˆπ’±}.\|v\|_{\mathscr{V}}:=\inf\{|a|^{-1}\mid\text{$a\in k^{\times}$ and $av\in\mathscr{V}$}\}.

Note that β€–.‖𝒱\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}} forms a norm of VV. Moreover, for a norm β€–.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\| of VV,

(V,β€–.β€–)≀1:={v∈Vβˆ£β€–v‖≀1}(V,\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|)_{\leq 1}:=\{v\in V\mid\|v\|\leq 1\}

is a lattice of VV.

Proposition 1.14.

Let 𝒱\mathscr{V} be a lattice of VV. We assume that, as an 𝔬k\mathfrak{o}_{k}-module, 𝒱\mathscr{V} admits a free basis (e1,…,er)(e_{1},\ldots,e_{r}). Then (e1,…,er)(e_{1},\ldots,e_{r}) is an orthonormal basis of VV with respect to β€–.‖𝒱\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}}.

Proof.

For v=a1​e1+β‹―+ar​er∈Vv=a_{1}e_{1}+\cdots+a_{r}e_{r}\in V and a∈kΓ—a\in k^{\times},

a​vβˆˆπ’±\displaystyle av\in\mathscr{V} ⟺a​aiβˆˆπ”¬kΒ for allΒ i=1,…,r\displaystyle\Longleftrightarrow\text{$aa_{i}\in\mathfrak{o}_{k}$ for all $i=1,\ldots,r$}
⟺|ai|≀|a|βˆ’1Β for allΒ i=1,…,r\displaystyle\Longleftrightarrow\text{$|a_{i}|\leq|a|^{-1}$ for all $i=1,\ldots,r$}
⟺max⁑{|a1|,…,|ar|}≀|a|βˆ’1,\displaystyle\Longleftrightarrow\text{$\max\{|a_{1}|,\ldots,|a_{r}|\}\leq|a|^{-1}$},

so that β€–v‖𝒱=max⁑{|a1|,…,|ar|}\|v\|_{\mathscr{V}}=\max\{|a_{1}|,\ldots,|a_{r}|\}. ∎

Let us consider the following lemmas.

Lemma 1.15.

A subgroup GG of (ℝ,+)(\mathbb{R},+) is either discrete or dense in ℝ\mathbb{R}.

Proof.

Clearly we may assume that Gβ‰ {0}G\not=\{0\}, so that Gβˆ©β„>0β‰ βˆ…G\cap\mathbb{R}_{>0}\not=\emptyset. We set Ξ΄=inf(Gβˆ©β„>0)\delta=\inf(G\cap\mathbb{R}_{>0}). If δ∈Gβˆ©β„>0\delta\in G\cap\mathbb{R}_{>0}, then G=℀​δG=\mathbb{Z}\delta. Indeed, for g∈Gg\in G, let nn be an integer such that n≀g/Ξ΄<n+1n\leq g/\delta<n+1. Thus 0≀gβˆ’n​δ<Ξ΄0\leq g-n\delta<\delta, and hence g=n​δg=n\delta. Therefore, GG is discrete.

Next we assume that Ξ΄βˆ‰Gβˆ©β„>0\delta\not\in G\cap\mathbb{R}_{>0}. Then there is a sequence {Ξ΄n}n=1∞\{\delta_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty} in Gβˆ©β„>0G\cap\mathbb{R}_{>0} such that Ξ΄n>Ξ΄n+1\delta_{n}>\delta_{n+1} for all nn and limnβ†’βˆžΞ΄n=Ξ΄\lim_{n\to\infty}\delta_{n}=\delta. If we set an=Ξ΄nβˆ’Ξ΄n+1a_{n}=\delta_{n}-\delta_{n+1}, then an∈Gβˆ©β„>0a_{n}\in G\cap\mathbb{R}_{>0} and limnβ†’βˆžan=0\lim_{n\to\infty}a_{n}=0. For an open interval (Ξ±,Ξ²)(\alpha,\beta) of ℝ\mathbb{R} (Ξ±<Ξ²\alpha<\beta), we choose ana_{n} and an integer mm such that an<Ξ²βˆ’Ξ±a_{n}<\beta-\alpha and m<Ξ²/an≀m+1m<\beta/a_{n}\leq m+1. Then we have m​an<Ξ²ma_{n}<\beta and

Ξ±<Ξ²βˆ’an≀(m+1)​anβˆ’an=m​an,\alpha<\beta-a_{n}\leq(m+1)a_{n}-a_{n}=ma_{n},

so that m​an∈(Ξ±,Ξ²)∩Gma_{n}\in(\alpha,\beta)\cap G. Thus GG is dense. ∎

Lemma 1.16.

Let β€–.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\| be a norm of VV and 𝒱:=(V,β€–.β€–)≀1\mathscr{V}:=(V,\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|)_{\leq 1}. Then

β€–v‖𝒱=inf{|b|∣b∈kΓ—Β andΒ β€–v‖≀|b|}.\|v\|_{\mathscr{V}}=\inf\{|b|\mid\text{$b\in k^{\times}$ and $\|v\|\leq|b|$}\}.

Moreover, β€–.‖≀‖.‖𝒱\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|\leq\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}} and β€–.‖𝒱≀|Ξ±|​‖.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}}\leq|\alpha|\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\| for all α∈kΓ—\alpha\in k^{\times} with |Ξ±|>1|\alpha|>1.

Proof.

The first assertion is obvious because, for a∈kΓ—a\in k^{\times}, a​vβˆˆπ’±av\in\mathscr{V} if and only if β€–v‖≀|a|βˆ’1\|v\|\leq|a|^{-1}.

For v∈Vv\in V, let a∈kΓ—a\in k^{\times} with a​vβˆˆπ’±av\in\mathscr{V}. Then β€–a​v‖≀1\|av\|\leq 1, that is, β€–v‖≀|a|βˆ’1\|v\|\leq|a|^{-1}, and hence β€–v‖≀‖v‖𝒱\|v\|\leq\|v\|_{\mathscr{V}}.

Finally we consider the second inequality, that is, β€–v‖𝒱≀|Ξ±|​‖vβ€–\|v\|_{\mathscr{V}}\leq|\alpha|\|v\| for v∈Vv\in V. Clearly we may assume that vβ‰ 0v\not=0. As |Ξ±|βˆ’1<1|\alpha|^{-1}<1, there is Ο΅>0\epsilon>0 with |Ξ±|βˆ’1​eΟ΅<1|\alpha|^{-1}e^{\epsilon}<1. By the first assertion, we can choose b∈kΓ—b\in k^{\times} such that β€–v‖≀|b|≀eϡ​‖v‖𝒱\|v\|\leq|b|\leq e^{\epsilon}\|v\|_{\mathscr{V}}. If β€–vβ€–<|bβ€‹Ξ±βˆ’1|\|v\|<|b\alpha^{-1}|, then

β€–v‖𝒱≀|b|​|Ξ±|βˆ’1≀eϡ​‖v‖𝒱​|Ξ±|βˆ’1.\|v\|_{\mathscr{V}}\leq|b||\alpha|^{-1}\leq e^{\epsilon}\|v\|_{\mathscr{V}}|\alpha|^{-1}.

Thus 1≀eϡ​|Ξ±|βˆ’11\leq e^{\epsilon}|\alpha|^{-1}. This is a contradiction, so that β€–vβ€–β‰₯|bβ€‹Ξ±βˆ’1|\|v\|\geq|b\alpha^{-1}|. Therefore,

β€–v‖𝒱≀|b|≀|Ξ±|​‖vβ€–,\|v\|_{\mathscr{V}}\leq|b|\leq|\alpha|\|v\|,

as required. ∎

Proposition 1.17.

We assume that |.||\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}| is discrete. Then we have the following:

  1. (1)

    Every lattice 𝒱\mathscr{V} of VV is a finitely generated 𝔬k\mathfrak{o}_{k}-module.

  2. (2)

    If we set 𝒱:=(V,β€–.β€–)≀1\mathscr{V}:=(V,\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|)_{\leq 1} for a norm of β€–.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\| of VV, then β€–.‖≀‖.‖𝒱≀|Ο–|βˆ’1​‖.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|\leq\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}}\leq|\varpi|^{-1}\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|.

Proof.

(1) Let (e1β€²,…,erβ€²)(e^{\prime}_{1},\ldots,e^{\prime}_{r}) be an orthogonal basis of VV with respect to β€–.‖𝒱\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}} (cf. PropositionΒ 1.3). As |.||\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}| is discrete, there is Ξ»i∈kΓ—\lambda_{i}\in k^{\times} with |Ξ»i|=β€–ei′‖𝒱|\lambda_{i}|=\|e^{\prime}_{i}\|_{\mathscr{V}}. If we set ei=Ξ»iβˆ’1​eiβ€²e_{i}=\lambda_{i}^{-1}e^{\prime}_{i} for i=1,…,ri=1,\ldots,r, then (e1,…,er)(e_{1},\ldots,e_{r}) forms an orthonormal basis of VV with respect to β€–.‖𝒱\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}}. Therefore,

π’±βŠ†(V,β€–.‖𝒱)≀1=𝔬k​e1+β‹―+𝔬k​er.\mathscr{V}\subseteq(V,\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}})_{\leq 1}=\mathfrak{o}_{k}e_{1}+\cdots+\mathfrak{o}_{k}e_{r}.

Thus we have (1) because 𝔬k\mathfrak{o}_{k} is noetherian.

(2) follows from Lemma 1.16. ∎

Proposition 1.18.

We assume that |.||\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}| is not discrete. If we set 𝒱:=(V,β€–.β€–)≀1\mathscr{V}:=(V,\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|)_{\leq 1} for a norm of β€–.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\| of VV, then β€–.β€–=β€–.‖𝒱\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|=\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}}.

Proof.

By LemmaΒ 1.15, we can find a sequence {Ξ²n}n=1∞\{\beta_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty} such that |Ξ²n|>1|\beta_{n}|>1 and limnβ†’βˆž|Ξ²n|=1\lim_{n\to\infty}|\beta_{n}|=1. On the other hand, by LemmaΒ 1.16,

β€–.‖≀‖.‖𝒱≀|Ξ²n|​‖.β€–.\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|\leq\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}}\leq|\beta_{n}|\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|.

Therefore the assertion follows. ∎

Proposition 1.19.

We assume that the absolute value |.||\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}| is not discrete. Let β€–.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\| be a norm of VV and 𝒱:=(V,β€–.β€–)≀1\mathscr{V}:=(V,\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|)_{\leq 1}. For any Ο΅>0\epsilon>0, there is a sub-lattice 𝒱′\mathscr{V}^{\prime} of 𝒱\mathscr{V} such that 𝒱′\mathscr{V}^{\prime} is finitely generated over 𝔬k\mathfrak{o}_{k} and β€–.‖≀‖.‖𝒱′≀eϡ​‖.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|\leq\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}^{\prime}}\leq e^{\epsilon}\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|.

Proof.

Let (e1,…,er)(e_{1},\ldots,e_{r}) be an eβˆ’Ο΅/2e^{-\epsilon/2}-orthogonal basis of VV with respect to β€–.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\| (cf. PropositionΒ 1.3). As β€–.β€–=β€–.‖𝒱\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|=\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}} by PropositionΒ 1.18, we can find Ξ»i∈kΓ—\lambda_{i}\in k^{\times} such that β€–ei‖≀|Ξ»i|≀eΟ΅/2​‖eiβ€–\|e_{i}\|\leq|\lambda_{i}|\leq e^{\epsilon/2}\|e_{i}\| for each ii. We set Ο‰i:=Ξ»iβˆ’1​ei\omega_{i}:=\lambda_{i}^{-1}e_{i} (i=1,…,ri=1,\ldots,r) and 𝒱′:=𝔬k​ω1+β‹―+𝔬k​ωr\mathscr{V}^{\prime}:=\mathfrak{o}_{k}\omega_{1}+\cdots+\mathfrak{o}_{k}\omega_{r}. Note that Ο‰iβˆˆπ’±\omega_{i}\in\mathscr{V} for all ii, that is, 𝒱′\mathscr{V}^{\prime} is a sub-lattice of 𝒱\mathscr{V} and 𝒱′\mathscr{V}^{\prime} is finitely generated over 𝔬k\mathfrak{o}_{k}. For c1,…,cr∈kc_{1},\ldots,c_{r}\in k, by PropositionΒ 1.14,

β€–c1​e1+β‹―+cr​er‖𝒱′\displaystyle\|c_{1}e_{1}+\cdots+c_{r}e_{r}\|_{\mathscr{V}^{\prime}} =β€–c1​λ1​ω1+β‹―+cr​λr​ωr‖𝒱′=max⁑{|c1​λ1|,…,|cr​λr|}\displaystyle=\|c_{1}\lambda_{1}\omega_{1}+\cdots+c_{r}\lambda_{r}\omega_{r}\|_{\mathscr{V}^{\prime}}=\max\{|c_{1}\lambda_{1}|,\ldots,|c_{r}\lambda_{r}|\}
≀eΟ΅/2​{|c1|​‖e1β€–,…,|cr|​‖erβ€–}≀eϡ​‖c1​e1+β‹―+cr​erβ€–,\displaystyle\leq e^{\epsilon/2}\{|c_{1}|\|e_{1}\|,\ldots,|c_{r}|\|e_{r}\|\}\leq e^{\epsilon}\|c_{1}e_{1}+\cdots+c_{r}e_{r}\|,

so that we have β€–.‖𝒱′≀eϡ​‖.β€–\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|_{\mathscr{V}^{\prime}}\leq e^{\epsilon}\|\raisebox{1.72218pt}{.}\|. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.