ScalingStacks

9. Curves and toric varieties [01CF]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

9. Curves and toric varieties

9.1. Curves

Potential theory on non-Archimedean analytic curves (over arbitrary complete valuation fields) was developed in detail by A.Thuillier in [Thu05]. We only indicate how to recover Theorem A’ when dimX=1\dim X=1 following his approach.

Let XX be a smooth projective curve over KK. Thuillier defined spaces D0​(X)D^{0}(X) and D1​(X)D^{1}(X) of distributions and currents on XX as follows. An element of D0​(X)D^{0}(X) is an arbitrary function Xqm→𝐑X^{\mathrm{qm}}\to\mathbf{R} [Thu05, Proposition 3.3.3]. The d​dcdd^{c}-operator extends to d​dc:D0​(X)→D1​(X)dd^{c}:D^{0}(X)\to D^{1}(X), and its image is exactly the set of currents ρ∈D1​(X)\rho\in D^{1}(X) such that ∫Xρ=0\int_{X}\rho=0 [Thu05, Théorème 3.3.13]. By linearity, this fact easily reduces to the existence, for any two x,y∈Xdivx,y\in X^{\mathrm{div}}, of a ’Green function’, i.e. a model function gx,yg_{x,y} such that d​dc​gx,y=δx−δydd^{c}g_{x,y}=\delta_{x}-\delta_{y}. The existence of gx,yg_{x,y} is in turn a consequence of the intersection form being negative definite on Div0⁡(𝒳)𝐑/𝐑​𝒳0\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbf{R}}/\mathbf{R}\mathcal{X}_{0}, for a model 𝒳\mathcal{X} such that xx and yy correspond to components of 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0}.

Now let ω\omega be a (1,1)(1,1)-form with ∫ω>0\int\omega>0, and let μ\mu be an arbitrary positive Radon measure on XX such that ∫μ=∫ω\int\mu=\int\omega. The previous result shows the existence of a distribution φμ\varphi_{\mu} such that

(9.1) ω+d​dc​φμ=μ.\omega+dd^{c}\varphi_{\mu}=\mu.

By [Thu05, Lemme 3.4.1] the positivity of the current ω+d​dc​φμ\omega+dd^{c}\varphi_{\mu} shows that φμ\varphi_{\mu} uniquely extends to a ω\omega-psh function, and we conclude that any positive Radon measure μ\mu with ∫μ=∫ω\int\mu=\int\omega satisfies (9.1) for some φ∈PSH⁡(X,ω)\varphi\in\PSH(X,\omega), unique up to an additive constant.

Finally, assume that μ\mu is supported on a dual complex Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. In order to see that φμ∈C0​(X)\varphi_{\mu}\in C^{0}(X), we may assume that 𝒳\mathcal{X} is also a determination of ω\omega. In this one-dimensional setting, it is easy to check that composing with the retraction p𝒳:X→Δ𝒳p_{\mathcal{X}}:X\to\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} preserves ω\omega-psh functions, i.e. φ∘p𝒳\varphi\circ p_{\mathcal{X}} is ω\omega-psh for every ω\omega-psh function φ\varphi. Since μ\mu is supported on Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} we have (p𝒳)∗​μ=μ\left(p_{\mathcal{X}}\right)_{*}\mu=\mu, hence θ+d​dc​(φμ∘p𝒳)=μ\theta+dd^{c}(\varphi_{\mu}\circ p_{\mathcal{X}})=\mu. It follows that φμ∘p𝒳=φμ\varphi_{\mu}\circ p_{\mathcal{X}}=\varphi_{\mu} by uniqueness up to an additive constant, since the two functions coincide on Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. Now φμ|Δ𝒳\varphi_{\mu}|_{\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}} is continuous, hence the continuity of φμ\varphi_{\mu}.

Let us now make the connection with the approach we followed in higher dimensions. In dimension 11, the energy is equal to E⁡(φ)=2​∫φ​ω+∫φ​d​dc​φE(\varphi)=2\int\varphi\omega+\int\varphi dd^{c}\varphi so that a ω\omega-psh function φ\varphi has finite energy iff φ\varphi is integrable with respect to the trace measure of d​dc​φdd^{c}\varphi.

Now fix a positive Radon measure μ\mu such that the solution φμ\varphi_{\mu} to (9.1) has finite energy. Then φμ\varphi_{\mu} is the unique ω\omega-psh function realizing the infimum of the functional E⁡(φ)−∫φ​μE(\varphi)-\int\varphi\mu, by [Thu05, Proposition 3.5.9].

Observe that the assumption on μ\mu is automatically satisfied when μ\mu is supported in some dual complex Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} whence Thuillier’s result gives a stronger version than our result in dimension 11.

We refer to [Thu05] for more on potential theory on non-Archimedean curves including the notion of harmonic functions, capacity, and the study of polar sets. See also [BR10] for the case of the projective line.

9.2. Toric varieties

We use [Ful93, KKMS73, BPS11] as references. Let M≃𝐙nM\simeq\mathbf{Z}^{n} be a free abelian group, NN its dual, and let T=Spec⁡K⁡[M]T=\Spec K[M] be the corresponding split KK-torus. A projective toric KK-variety XX is described by a rational fan subdivision Σ\Sigma of N𝐑N_{\mathbf{R}}, and there is a natural embedding j:N𝐑→Xanj:N_{\mathbf{R}}\to X^{\mathrm{an}} given by monomial valuations that sends n∈N𝐑n\in N_{\mathbf{R}} to the norm ∑am​m∈K⁡[M]↦max⁡{|am|​exp⁡(−⟨m,n⟩)}\sum a_{m}m\in K[M]\mapsto\max\{|a_{m}|\exp(-\langle m,n\rangle)\}. In particular, j⁡(0)=xGj(0)=x_{G}, the Gauss point of the open TT-orbit.

An ample TT-line bundle LL on XX defines a rational polytope Δ⊂M𝐑\Delta\subset M_{\mathbf{R}} with normal fan Σ\Sigma, such that points of M∩ΔM\cap\Delta identify with TT-eigensections of LL.

According to [BPS11] we have the following description of toric metrics on LL. The polytope Δ\Delta is the Newton polytope of the piecewise 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-linear convex function gΔ=supm∈Δmg_{\Delta}=\sup_{m\in\Delta}m on the dual space N𝐑=M𝐑∗N_{\mathbf{R}}=M_{\mathbf{R}}^{*}, and toric bounded (resp. model) metrics ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| on LL correspond to bounded (resp. piecewise 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-affine) functions ff on N𝐑N_{\mathbf{R}} such that f−gΔf-g_{\Delta} is bounded. The metric ∥⋅∥f\|\cdot\|_{f} attached to a function ff is semipositive iff ff is convex.

The real Monge-Ampère measure of any convex function ff on N𝐑N_{\mathbf{R}} is a well-defined positive Radon measure MA𝐑⁡(f)\MA_{\mathbf{R}}(f) on N𝐑N_{\mathbf{R}} (see e.g. [RT77]), while the growth condition f=gΔ+O⁡(1)f=g_{\Delta}+O(1) further guarantees that

∫N𝐑MA𝐑⁡(f)=Vol⁡(Δ).\int_{N_{\mathbf{R}}}\MA_{\mathbf{R}}(f)=\vol(\Delta).

If ff is a convex function on N𝐑N_{\mathbf{R}} with f=gΔ+O⁡(1)f=g_{\Delta}+O(1), and if ∥⋅∥f\|\cdot\|_{f} is the corresponding continuous semipositive metric on LL, then [BPS11, Theorem 5.70] relates their Monge-Ampère measures as follows:

(9.2) c1(L,∥⋅∥f)n=n!j∗MA𝐑(f).c_{1}(L,\|\cdot\|_{f})^{n}=n!\,j_{*}\MA_{\mathbf{R}}(f).

Since gΔg_{\Delta} is homogeneous, MA𝐑⁡(gΔ)\MA_{\mathbf{R}}(g_{\Delta}) is a Dirac mass at the origin of mass Vol⁡(Δ)\vol(\Delta), and [Ful93, p.111] implies the corresponding metric ∥⋅∥gΔ\|\cdot\|_{g_{\Delta}} on LL to satisfy

c1(L,∥⋅∥gΔ)n=c1(L)nδxG.c_{1}(L,\|\cdot\|_{g_{\Delta}})^{n}=c_{1}(L)^{n}\,\delta_{x_{G}}.

Translating in N𝐑N_{\mathbf{R}} we get:

Proposition 9.1.

Let μ\mu be a Dirac mass on XX centered at a toric divisorial point j⁡(x)∈Xdivj(x)\in X^{\mathrm{div}}, x∈N𝐐x\in N_{\mathbf{Q}}. Then c1(L,∥⋅∥x)n=μc_{1}(L,\|\cdot\|_{x})^{n}=\mu, where ∥⋅∥x\|\cdot\|_{x} is the toric model metric attached to the convex piecewise 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-affine function y↦gΔ​(y−x)y\mapsto g_{\Delta}(y-x).

In the case of atomic measures supported at toric divisorial points, we can show:

Proposition 9.2.

Let (X,L)(X,L) be a polarized toric KK-variety. Pick x1,…,xN∈N𝐐x_{1},...,x_{N}\in N_{\mathbf{Q}} and set μw:=∑iwi​δj⁡(xi)\mu_{w}:=\sum_{i}w_{i}\delta_{j(x_{i})} for each w∈𝐑+Nw\in\mathbf{R}_{+}^{N}. Then for a dense set of w∈𝐑+N∩{∑iwi=degL}w\in\mathbf{R}_{+}^{N}\cap\{\sum_{i}w_{i}=\deg L\} the semipositive toric metric ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| solving

c1(L,∥⋅∥w)n=∑iwiδj⁡(xi).c_{1}(L,\|\cdot\|_{w})^{n}=\sum_{i}w_{i}\delta_{j(x_{i})}.

is a model metric.

Proof.

For each t∈𝐑Nt\in\mathbf{R}^{N} let ftf_{t} be the upper envelope of the family of piecewise 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-affine convex functions ff on N𝐑N_{\mathbf{R}} such that f=gΔ+O⁡(1)f=g_{\Delta}+O(1) and f⁡(xi)≤tif(x_{i})\leq t_{i} for all ii, and let ∥⋅∥t\|\cdot\|_{t} be the corresponding continuous toric semipositive metric. By Proposition 8.6, each measure μw\mu_{w} with w∈𝐑+N∩{∑iwi=degL}w\in\mathbf{R}_{+}^{N}\cap\{\sum_{i}w_{i}=\deg L\} is of the form c1(L,∥⋅∥t)nc_{1}(L,\|\cdot\|_{t})^{n} for some t∈𝐑Nt\in\mathbf{R}^{N}. Now elementary Newton polytope considerations show that ftf_{t} is piecewise 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-affine when all tit_{i} are rational, and the result follows by continuity of t↦c1(L,∥⋅∥t)nt\mapsto c_{1}(L,\|\cdot\|_{t})^{n}. ∎

Remark 9.3.

Results of this section are likely to extend to the case of an arbitrary non-Archimedean complete non-trivially valued field. We refer to [BPR11, Gub08] for a discussion of toric varieties in this context.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.