Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Note that implies , hence for all . We are going to show that
(7.1)
For all . If is continuous, then the result follows
immediately from Theorem 7.2.
In general, let
be a decreasing sequence of -psh model functions
converging to , see Proposition 4.5.
For each the sequence is a decreasing
sequence of -psh functions, and we claim that .
Indeed let . Since , we have , hence .
Conversely, for all , hence and it follows
as required.
As , and
decrease to and , respectively
and by Proposition 6.9,
converges to
for each .
Finally (7.1) follows
from (7.2) using dominated convergence in view of
the upper bound for all and all .
∎