ScalingStacks

Proof. [01BG]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Given f∈𝒟⁡(X)f\in\mathcal{D}(X), we have by definition that ∫f​MA⁡(φ⟨t⟩)→∫f​MA⁡(φ)\int f\MA(\varphi^{\langle t\rangle})\to\int f\MA(\varphi) as t→∞t\to\infty and ∫f​MA⁡(φj⟨t⟩)→∫f​MA⁡(φj)\int f\MA(\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}_{j})\to\int f\MA(\varphi_{j}) as t→∞t\to\infty for every jj. Moreover, Lemma 6.8 shows that the latter convergence is uniform in jj. Since for each tt we have ∫f​MA⁡(φj⟨t⟩)→∫f​MA⁡(φ⟨t⟩)\int f\MA(\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}_{j})\to\int f\MA(\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}) as j→∞j\to\infty by Theorem 3.1, the result follows. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.