ScalingStacks

Proof of Theorem 5.1 . [01AY]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof of Theorem 5.1.

We prove the result for successively more general functions φ\varphi, ψ\psi.

Step 1. First assume φ\varphi, ψ\psi are ω\omega-psh model functions.

Pick an SNC model 𝒳\mathcal{X} on which φ\varphi, ψ\psi and max⁡{φ,ψ}\max\{\varphi,\psi\} are determined by vertical divisors A,BA,B and CC respectively. These three functions are then affine on any face of the dual complex Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. Further, MA⁡(φ)\MA(\varphi) and MA⁡(max⁡{φ,ψ})\MA(\max\{\varphi,\psi\}) are both atomic measures, supported on divisorial points corresponding to irreducible components of the special fiber, see §2.7. If EE is such a component for which φ⁡(xE)>ψ⁡(xE)\varphi(x_{E})>\psi(x_{E}), then φ⁡(xF)≥ψ⁡(xF)\varphi(x_{F})\geq\psi(x_{F}) and hence max⁡{φ⁡(xF),ψ⁡(xF)}=φ⁡(xF)\max\{\varphi(x_{F}),\psi(x_{F})\}=\varphi(x_{F}) for all irreducible components FF of the special fiber intersecting EωE_{\omega}, or else max⁡{φ,ψ}\max\{\varphi,\psi\} would not be affine on the face [xE,xF][x_{E},x_{F}] in Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. We have thus shown ordF⁡(A)=ordF⁡(C)\ord_{F}(A)=\ord_{F}(C) for all components FF of 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0} intersecting EωE_{\omega}. If follows that A|E=C|EA|_{E}=C|_{E} as numerical classes on EωE_{\omega}, and hence MA⁡(max⁡{φ,ψ})​{xE}=MA⁡(φ)​{xE}\MA(\max\{\varphi,\psi\})\{x_{E}\}=\MA(\varphi)\{x_{E}\} by definition of Monge-Ampère measures of model functions.

Step 2. Now suppose that φ\varphi is an ω\omega-psh model function but that ψ\psi is merely a bounded ω\omega-psh function.

We may assume −M≤φ,ψ<0-M\leq\varphi,\psi<0, where M≥1M\geq 1. Note that the set Ω:={φ>ψ}\Omega:=\{\varphi>\psi\} is open since φ\varphi is continuous and ψ\psi is usc. It suffices to prove that ∫h​MA⁡(max⁡{φ,ψ})=∫h​MA⁡(φ)\int h\MA(\max\{\varphi,\psi\})=\int h\MA(\varphi) for all model functions hh whose support is contained in Ω\Omega and such that 0≤h≤10\leq h\leq 1.

Fix a small number δ>0\delta>0. By Proposition 4.3 there exists an open set G⊆XG\subseteq X and a decreasing sequence (ψj)j=1∞(\psi_{j})_{j=1}^{\infty} of ω\omega-psh model functions on XX such that Capω⁡(G)<δ\Capa_{\omega}(G)<\delta and such that ψj\psi_{j} converges uniformly to ψ\psi on GcG^{c}. Pick ε>0\varepsilon>0 small and rational and write Ωj:={φ+ε>ψj}\Omega_{j}:=\{\varphi+\varepsilon>\psi_{j}\}. For j≫0j\gg 0, we have Ω∩Gc⊆Ωj\Omega\cap G^{c}\subseteq\Omega_{j}. Since φ+ε\varphi+\varepsilon and ψj\psi_{j} are both model functions, we have MA⁡(max⁡{φ+ε,ψj})=MA⁡(φ)\MA(\max\{\varphi+\varepsilon,\psi_{j}\})=\MA(\varphi) on Ωj\Omega_{j} by Step 1. It follows from Lemma 4.6 that

|∫h​MA⁡(max⁡{φ+ε,ψj})−∫h​MA⁡(φ)|\displaystyle\left|\int h\MA(\max\{\varphi+\varepsilon,\psi_{j}\})-\int h\MA(\varphi)\right| ≤|∫Gh​MA⁡(max⁡{φ+ε,ψ})−∫Gh​MA⁡(φ)|\displaystyle\leq\left|\int\limits_{G}h\MA(\max\{\varphi+\varepsilon,\psi\})-\int\limits_{G}h\MA(\varphi)\right|
≤2​Mn​δ,\displaystyle\leq 2M^{n}\delta,

where we have used 0≤h≤10\leq h\leq 1 and −M≤φ+ε,ψ≤0-M\leq\varphi+\varepsilon,\psi\leq 0.

Since hh is a model function, it is the difference of two ω\omega-psh model functions by Proposition 2.6. Now max⁡{φ+ε,ψj}\max\{\varphi+\varepsilon,\psi_{j}\} decreases to max⁡{φ,ψ}\max\{\varphi,\psi\} as j→∞j\to\infty and ε→0\varepsilon\to 0, so Theorem 3.1 and the above inequality imply

|∫h​MA⁡(max⁡{φ,ψ})−∫h​MA⁡(φ)|≤2​Mn​δ.\left|\int h\MA(\max\{\varphi,\psi\})-\int h\MA(\varphi)\right|\leq 2M^{n}\delta.

We obtain the desired equality letting δ→0\delta\to 0.

Step 3. Finally we treat the general case when φ\varphi and ψ\psi are bounded ω\omega-psh functions.

Let (φj)1∞(\varphi_{j})_{1}^{\infty} be a decreasing net of ω\omega-psh model functions converging to φ\varphi. Write Ωj:={φj>ψ}\Omega_{j}:=\{\varphi_{j}>\psi\}. This is an open set. Set u:=max⁡{0,φ−ψ}u:=\max\{0,\varphi-\psi\}. Then

{φ>ψ}={u>0}⊆⋂jΩj.\{\varphi>\psi\}=\{u>0\}\subseteq\bigcap_{j}\Omega_{j}.

By what precedes, MA⁡(max⁡{φj,ψ})=MA⁡(φj)\MA(\max\{\varphi_{j},\psi\})=\MA(\varphi_{j}) on Ωj\Omega_{j}. Moreover max⁡{φj,ψ}\max\{\varphi_{j},\psi\} decreases to max⁡{φ,ψ}\max\{\varphi,\psi\} and so the measure MA⁡(max⁡{φj,ψ})\MA(\max\{\varphi_{j},\psi\}) converges weakly to MA⁡(max⁡{φ,ψ})\MA(\max\{\varphi,\psi\}). Let ff be a continuous function on XX. By Proposition 4.3 φ,ψ\varphi,\psi are quasicontinuous. It follows that uu and f​ufu are also quasicontinuous, and applying Lemma 5.4 twice we get that

∫f​u​MA⁡(max⁡{φ,ψ})=limj→∞∫f​u​MA⁡(max⁡{φj,ψ})=limj→∞∫f​u​MA⁡(φj)=∫f​u​MA⁡(φ).\int fu\MA(\max\{\varphi,\psi\})=\lim_{j\to\infty}\int fu\MA(\max\{\varphi_{j},\psi\})=\lim_{j\to\infty}\int fu\MA(\varphi_{j})=\int fu\MA(\varphi).

This holds for every f∈C0​(X)f\in C^{0}(X), so 𝟏{φ>ψ}MA(max{φ,ψ})=𝟏{φ>ψ}MA(φ)\one_{\{\varphi>\psi\}}\MA(\max\{\varphi,\psi\})=\one_{\{\varphi>\psi\}}\MA(\varphi), as was to be shown. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.