ScalingStacks

Proof of Proposition 4.3 . [01AN]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof of Proposition 4.3.

Let (φj)j(\varphi_{j})_{j} be a decreasing net of ω\omega-psh model functions converging to φ\varphi. We may assume that −M≤φj≤0-M\leq\varphi_{j}\leq 0 for all jj, where M≥1M\geq 1. For any ω\omega-psh function ψ\psi with −1≤ψ≤0-1\leq\psi\leq 0 it follows from Lemma 4.7 that

0≤∫(φj−φ)​MA⁡(ψ)≤4​M​(∫(φj−φ)​MA⁡(φ2))12n0\leq\int(\varphi_{j}-\varphi)\MA(\psi)\leq 4M\left(\int(\varphi_{j}-\varphi)\MA(\frac{\varphi}{2})\right)^{\frac{1}{2^{n}}}

and the right hand side tends to zero as j→∞j\to\infty by Theorem 3.1. It therefore follows from the definition of the capacity and from Chebyshev’s inequality that for each integer m≥1m\geq 1 there exists jmj_{m} such that the open set Gm:={φjm−φ>1m}G_{m}:=\{\varphi_{j_{m}}-\varphi>\frac{1}{m}\} has capacity 2−m​ε2^{-m}\varepsilon. We can then set G:=⋃mGmG:=\bigcup_{m}G_{m} and φm:=φjm\varphi_{m}:=\varphi_{j_{m}}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.