ScalingStacks

Remark 2.22 . [019S]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 2.22.

In the complex case we have by Stokes’ theorem

∫fddcg∧θ1∧…∧θn−1=−∫df∧dcg∧θ1∧…∧θn−1,\int f\,dd^{c}g\wedge\theta_{1}\wedge...\wedge\theta_{n-1}=-\int df\wedge d^{c}g\wedge\theta_{1}\wedge...\wedge\theta_{n-1},

and negativity comes from that of the (1,1)(1,1)-form d​f∧dc​fdf\wedge d^{c}f. Recall also that d​f∧dc​f∧ωn−1=|d​f|ω2​ωndf\wedge d^{c}f\wedge\omega^{n-1}=|df|_{\omega}^{2}\,\omega^{n} when ω\omega is a Kähler form, so that (−∫fddcf∧ωn−1)1/2\left(-\int f\,dd^{c}f\wedge\omega^{n-1}\right)^{1/2} is the L2L^{2}-norm of the gradient of ff.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.