ScalingStacks

2.1. Berkovich space and models [018V]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.1. Berkovich space and models

Let RR be a complete discrete valuation ring with fraction field KK and residue field kk. We shall assume that kk has characteristic zero. We let t∈Rt\in R be a uniformizing parameter and normalize the corresponding absolute value on KK by log⁡|t|−1=1\log|t|^{-1}=1. Note that R≃k⁡[[t]]R\simeq k[\![t]\!] and K≃k⁡((t))K\simeq k(\!(t)\!), see for instance [Ser68]. Write S:=Spec⁡RS:=\spec R.

Let XX be a smooth projective KK-variety, i.e. an integral (but not necessarily geometrically integral) smooth projective KK-scheme. A model of XX is a normal, flat and projective SS-scheme 𝒳\mathcal{X} with XX as its generic fiber. We denote by 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0} its special fiber, and by Div0⁡(𝒳)\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}) the group of vertical Cartier divisors, i.e. those supported in 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0}. We write Div0⁡(𝒳)𝐑\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbf{R}} accordingly.

Let ℳX\mathcal{M}_{X} be the set of all isomorphism classes of models of XX. Given 𝒳′,𝒳\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\mathcal{X} in ℳX\mathcal{M}_{X} we write 𝒳′≥𝒳\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\geq\mathcal{X} if there exists a morphism 𝒳′→𝒳\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} obtained by blowing up an ideal sheaf co-supported on the special fiber of 𝒳\mathcal{X}. This turns ℳX\mathcal{M}_{X} into a directed set.

Given a model 𝒳\mathcal{X}, let (Ei)i∈I(E_{i})_{i\in I} be the set of irreducible components of the special fiber. For each subset J⊂IJ\subset I set EJ:=⋂j∈JEjE_{J}:=\bigcap_{j\in J}E_{j}. A regular model 𝒳\mathcal{X} is an SNC model if the special fiber has simple normal crossing support and EJE_{J} is irreducible (or empty) for each J⊂IJ\subset I.

As a topological space, the Berkovich space XanX^{\mathrm{an}} attached to the given smooth projective KK-variety XX is compact and can be described as follows (cf. [Ber90, Theorem 3.4.1]). Choose a finite cover of XX by affine open subsets of the form U=Spec⁡AU=\spec A where AA is a KK-algebra of finite type. The Berkovich space UanU^{\mathrm{an}} is defined as the set of all multiplicative seminorms |⋅|:A→𝐑+|\cdot|:A\to\mathbf{R}_{+} extending the given absolute value of KK, endowed with the topology of pointwise convergence. The space XanX^{\mathrm{an}} is obtained by gluing the open sets UanU^{\mathrm{an}}.

There is a natural equivalence of categories between projective KK-analytic spaces and projective KK-schemes, see [Ber90, §3.4]. In the sequel we shall therefore always identify a projective KK-scheme with its associated Berkovich space and write Xan=XX^{\mathrm{an}}=X.

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a model of XX. To each irreducible component EE of the special fiber is associated a divisorial valuation ordE\ord_{E} of the function field of XX. After rescaling and exponentiating, this gives rise to an element xE∈Xx_{E}\in X called a divisorial point. The set XdivX^{\mathrm{div}} of divisorial points is dense in XX.

When 𝒳\mathcal{X} is an SNC model, we can refine this construction. Write the special fiber as 𝒳0=∑i∈Ibi​Ei\mathcal{X}_{0}=\sum_{i\in I}b_{i}E_{i}. The dual complex Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} of 𝒳\mathcal{X} is the simplicial complex whose vertices correspond to the irreducible components EiE_{i} and whose simplices correspond to nonempty intersections EJE_{J}. We can equip Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} with an (integral) affine structure and embed it in the Berkovich space XX as follows.

Consider a subset J⊂IJ\subset I with EJ≠∅E_{J}\neq\emptyset and pick w=(wj)j∈Jw=(w_{j})_{j\in J} with wj≥0w_{j}\geq 0 and ∑j∈Jbj​wj=1\sum_{j\in J}b_{j}w_{j}=1. Let ξJ\xi_{J} be the generic point of EJE_{J} and pick a system (zj)j∈J(z_{j})_{j\in J} of regular parameters for 𝒪𝒳,ξJ\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X},\xi_{J}} with zjz_{j} defining EjE_{j}. By Cohen’s structure theorem, 𝒪^𝒳,ξJ≃κ⁡(ξJ)​[[zj,j∈J]]\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{\mathcal{X},\xi_{J}}\simeq\kappa(\xi_{J})[[z_{j},j\in J]]. Let vJ,wv_{J,w} be the restriction to 𝒪𝒳,ξ\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X},\xi} of the monomial valuation on this power series ring, taking value wjw_{j} on zjz_{j}, i.e. vJ,w​(∑α∈𝐍Jcα​zα)=min⁡{∑j∈Jwj​αj∣cα≠0}v_{J,w}\left(\sum_{\alpha\in\mathbf{N}^{J}}c_{\alpha}z^{\alpha}\right)=\min\left\{\sum_{j\in J}w_{j}\alpha_{j}\mid c_{\alpha}\neq 0\right\}. Then e−vJ,w∈Xe^{-v_{J,w}}\in X. This defines an embedding emb𝒳:Δ𝒳→X\emb_{\mathcal{X}}:\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}\to X, and the parameters ww equip Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} with an affine structure.

There is also a retraction p𝒳:X→Δ𝒳p_{\mathcal{X}}:X\to\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}, defined as follows. Any point x∈Xx\in X admits a center on 𝒳\mathcal{X}. This is the unique point ξ=c𝒳​(x)∈𝒳0\xi=c_{\mathcal{X}}(x)\in\mathcal{X}_{0} such that |φ|x≤1|\varphi|_{x}\leq 1 for φ∈𝒪𝒳,ξ\varphi\in\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X},\xi} and |φ|x<1|\varphi|_{x}<1 for φ∈𝔪𝒳,ξ\varphi\in\mathfrak{m}_{\mathcal{X},\xi}. Let J⊂IJ\subset I be the maximal subset such that ξ∈EJ\xi\in E_{J}. Then p𝒳​(x)∈Δ𝒳p_{\mathcal{X}}(x)\in\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} corresponds to the monomial valuation with weight −log⁡|zj|x-\log|z_{j}|_{x}, j∈Jj\in J.

We have p𝒳=idp_{\mathcal{X}}=\id on Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. If 𝒴\mathcal{Y} dominates 𝒳\mathcal{X}, then Δ𝒳⊂Δ𝒴\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}\subset\Delta_{\mathcal{Y}} and p𝒳∘p𝒴=p𝒳p_{\mathcal{X}}\circ p_{\mathcal{Y}}=p_{\mathcal{X}}. The retractions induce a homeomorphism of XX onto the inverse limit lim←⁡Δ𝒳\varprojlim\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}.

In order to keep notation light, we shall identify Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} with its image in XX under emb𝒳\emb_{\mathcal{X}}. Note that this convention differs from the one adopted in [BFJ11]. A point in XX lying in some dual complex Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} is called quasi-monomial, and the set of such points is denoted by XqmX^{\mathrm{qm}}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.