ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 1904.03696v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

00LW

Proof. Take a complete non-Archimedean valued field extension (K,|⋅|K)(K,\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{K}) of (k,|⋅|k)(k,\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{k}) such that

∀i∈{0,…,d},{ri}i∈{0,…,d}⊆|k×|K,\forall i\in\{0,\dots,d\},\quad\{r_{i}\}_{i\in\{0,\dots,d\}}\subseteq\lvert k^{\times}\rvert_{K},

hence for any i∈{0,…,d}i\in\{0,\dots,d\}, there exist elements κi∈K\kappa_{i}\in K such that |κi|K=ri\lvert\kappa_{i}\rvert_{K}=r_{i}. One denotes by x⁡(𝒓)∈(ℙkd)anx(\boldsymbol{r})\in(\mathbb{P}^{d}_{k})^{\mathrm{an}} the point given by coordinates [κ0:…:κd][\kappa_{0}:\dots:\kappa_{d}].

00LX

Claim 5.2. For any i∈{0,…,d}i\in\{0,\dots,d\}, one has

∥Ti∥ϕ=ri=|Ti|ϕ​(x⁡(𝒓)).\lVert T_{i}\rVert_{\phi}=r_{i}=\lvert T_{i}\rvert_{\phi}(x(\boldsymbol{r})).

In other words, the maximum of the function |Ti|ϕ​(x)\lvert T_{i}\rvert_{\phi}(x) on (ℙkd)an(\mathbb{P}^{d}_{k})^{\mathrm{an}} is rir_{i}, and the maximum values of these d+1d+1 functions can be attained at the same point x⁡(𝒓)x(\boldsymbol{r}).

00LY

Proof. By the orthogonality of the basis {Ti}i∈{0,…,d}\{T_{i}\}_{i\in\{0,\dots,d\}}, we can compute

|Ti|ϕ​(x⁡(𝒓))=inf(∑m∈{0,…,d}fm⋅Tm)​(x⁡(𝒓))=(Ti)​(x⁡(𝒓))(f0,…,fd)∈kd+1∥∑m∈{0,…,d}fm⋅Tm∥ϕ=inf∑m∈{0,…,d}fm​κm=κimaxm∈{0,…,d}⁡{∥fm⋅Tm∥ϕ}=inf∑m∈{0,…,d}fm​κm=κimaxm∈{0,…,d}⁡{|fm|​|κm|}=inf∑m∈{0,…,d}fm​(κm/κi)=1maxm∈{0,…,d}⁡{|fm|​|κm/κi|⋅|κi|}=|κi|=ri.\begin{split}\lvert T_{i}\rvert_{\phi}(x(\boldsymbol{r}))&=\inf_{\begin{subarray}{c}(\sum_{m\in\{0,\dots,d\}}f_{m}\cdot T_{m})(x(\boldsymbol{r}))=(T_{i})(x(\boldsymbol{r}))\\ (f_{0},\dots,f_{d})\in k^{d+1}\end{subarray}}\Big\lVert\sum_{m\in\{0,\dots,d\}}f_{m}\cdot T_{m}\Big\rVert_{\phi}\\ &=\inf\limits_{\sum_{m\in\{0,\dots,d\}}f_{m}\kappa_{m}=\kappa_{i}}\max_{m\in\{0,\dots,d\}}\Big\{\lVert f_{m}\cdot T_{m}\rVert_{\phi}\Big\}\\ &=\inf\limits_{\sum_{m\in\{0,\dots,d\}}f_{m}\kappa_{m}=\kappa_{i}}\max_{m\in\{0,\dots,d\}}\Big\{\lvert f_{m}\rvert\lvert\kappa_{m}\rvert\Big\}\\ &=\inf\limits_{\sum_{m\in\{0,\dots,d\}}f_{m}(\kappa_{m}/\kappa_{i})=1}\max_{m\in\{0,\dots,d\}}\Big\{\lvert f_{m}\rvert\lvert\kappa_{m}/\kappa_{i}\rvert\cdot\lvert\kappa_{i}\rvert\Big\}\\ &=\lvert\kappa_{i}\rvert=r_{i}.\end{split}

The last equality is obtained by Lemma 3.13. ∎

By this Claim, for any multi-index JJ, the function |𝑻J|ϕ​(x)\lvert\boldsymbol{T}^{J}\rvert_{\phi}(x) can attain its maximum value ∏i∈{0,…,d}riji\prod_{i\in\{0,\dots,d\}}r_{i}^{j_{i}} at the point x⁡(𝒓)∈(ℙkd)a​nx(\boldsymbol{r})\in(\mathbb{P}_{k}^{d})^{an} as the product of maximum of factors of the monomial. By definition,

∥𝑻J∥|J|​ϕ=supx∈(ℙd)a​n|𝑻J|ϕ​(x)=∏i∈{0,…,d}riji=∏i∈{0,…,d}∥Ti∥ϕji.\lVert\boldsymbol{T}^{J}\rVert_{|J|\phi}=\sup_{x\in(\mathbb{P}^{d})^{an}}\lvert\boldsymbol{T}^{J}\rvert_{\phi}(x)=\prod_{i\in\{0,\dots,d\}}r_{i}^{j_{i}}=\prod_{i\in\{0,\dots,d\}}\lVert T_{i}\rVert_{\phi}^{j_{i}}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.