ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 1904.03696v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

00K6

Proof. Let s¯∈V^∙​(L,ϕ)\underline{s}\in\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L,\phi) be an element in rad​(V^∙​(L,ϕ))\text{rad}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L,\phi)), then by Proposition 3.1, one has

0=⦀s¯⦀ϕ;sp=⦀s⦀ϕ,0=\vvvert\underline{s}\vvvert_{\phi;\mathrm{sp}}=\vvvert s\vvvert_{\phi},

so

∀n∈ℕ,∥sn∥n​ϕ=0.\forall n\in\mathbb{N},\quad\lVert s_{n}\rVert_{n\phi}=0.

By the assumption, all componets sns_{n} are zero sections. So s¯=0¯\underline{s}=\underline{0}, hence V^∙​(L,ϕ)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L,\phi) is semi-simple. Same arguments works for V^∙​(L|Y,ϕ|Y)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L|_{Y},\phi|_{Y}).

Let t¯∈rad​(V^∙​(LX|Y,ϕX|Y))\underline{t}\in\text{rad}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y})). Then tn∈rad​(V^∙​(LX|Y,ϕX|Y))t_{n}\in\text{rad}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y})) for every n∈ℕn\in\mathbb{N}. For any m∈ℕm\in\mathbb{N}, there exists sn​m∈Vn​m​(L)s_{nm}\in V_{nm}(L) such that sn​m|Y=tnms_{nm}|_{Y}=t_{n}^{m} and

limm→∞∥sn​m∥n​m​ϕ1m=0.\lim_{\begin{subarray}{c}m\to\infty\end{subarray}}\lVert s_{nm}\rVert_{nm\phi}^{\frac{1}{m}}=0.

As ∥tnm∥n​m​ϕ|Y≤∥sn​m∥n​m​ϕ\lVert t_{n}^{m}\rVert_{nm\phi|_{Y}}\leq\lVert s_{nm}\rVert_{nm\phi}, one has that

∀n∈ℕ,∥tn∥n​ϕ|Y=0\forall n\in\mathbb{N},\quad\lVert t_{n}\rVert_{n\phi|_{Y}}=0

so t¯=0¯\underline{t}=\underline{0}. Hence V^∙​(LX|Y,ϕX|Y)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}) is semi-simple. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.